Cyclist fatalities since the UK lockdown began on 23 March are running at more than double the average for the time of year, road.cc can reveal, with 14 cyclists in Great Britain and one in Northern Ireland losing their lives in road traffic incidents.
> 15 cyclists killed on UK roads in first month of lockdown - here's what we know so far
While we would, as ever, caution against interpreting a sudden spike in casualties as reflective of a long-term trend, it is worth reflecting on some aspects of these unprecedented times that may have an influence.
According to Department for Transport (DfT) statistics, in the months of March and April from 2015 to 2018, there were 49 recorded deaths of cyclists in Great Britain – equivalent to a monthly average of 6.125 – less than half the total found by road.cc's analysis of news reports in the past month.
The fewest fatalities in those months during that period were recorded in March 2016, and in March and April 2017, each of which saw four cyclists die on Great Britain’s roads. The most came in March 2015, when nine were killed.
So, what might explain this sudden increase?
Well, it could be a short-term statistical blip, something we have certainly seen in the past.
But it could also be the result of one or more factors coming together as a result of how life here has changed in the past few weeks in a way that none of us would have thought possible at the start of the year.
First, while two of the fatalities we have seen reported since 23 March do not appear to have involved anyone other than the cyclist, all the others resulted from collisions involving motor vehicles.
Given that the roads are much quieter than usual, with traffic reverting to levels not seen since the 1950s, the spike in cyclist deaths does seem counter-intuitive.
However, a number of road traffic policing units across the country have highlighted issues such as an increase in speeding as some motorists take the opportunity of empty roads to ignore speed limits, as well as suggestions that drivers more likely to pose a risk to others are still out there while more law-abiding motorists remain at home.
In other words, there might be fewer drivers out there, but there is now a greater proportion of the ones who cause the most harm.
> East London council to block cars to protect cyclists and pedestrians from speeding drivers during pandemic
Turning to changes in cycling habits, under The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020, which we analyse here, reasonable excuses for a person to leave their home include to undertake exercise either alone or with other members of their household, or to travel to work when that cannot be done from home.
Evidence from the cycling industry is that sales of bicycles are booming, whether to people to undertake their daily exercise, or to travel to work while avoiding public transport.
And in both cases, the run of good weather we have had from late March onwards won’t have discouraged people from taking to two wheels in the same way that a couple of weeks of low temperatures, wind and rain would.
All other things being equal, more cyclists on the roads collectively riding a greater distance would be expected to lead to more casualties, fatal or otherwise.
But that then needs to be balanced against other significant changes that have happened in the riding habits of regular cyclists in recent weeks.
One of those is that many people who would normally commute by bike are working from home. Collectively, that’s likely to lead to a big fall in aggregate miles ridden – although of course, many may be getting out on their bike for daily exercise to replace that which they were getting while travelling to work.
But we’ve also seen big growth in cycling indoors, for example on smart trainers using platforms such as Zwift which by their nature attract many riding for sport or fitness, and who are putting at least some of their miles in at home, rather than out on the road.
That, coupled with events such as audax rides and sportives being cancelled, is also likely to have led to a drop in the aggregate miles being racked up across the country, we suspect (we’re nowhere near the peak season for the latter, of course, but events being postponed or scrapped will have removed an incentive for many to train).
As we said earlier, it’s a complex situation, one that could be nothing more than a statistical anomaly, or that could be the start of a trend that could be due to the huge upheavals in the way we live and travel. It’s far too early to tell which, but it should not be ignored.
Across the country, campaigners have been urging governments and local authorities to reallocate road space to cyclists and pedestrians to create safe environments for travel and exercise, and there are signs that is beginning to happen, albeit very slowly.
Cycling UK is urging people to write to their local councils to call for more space for cyclists during the lockdown – you can write to your council via their website by following this link.
The charity’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore, told road.cc: “Over the past weeks one of the few positives has been seeing families and individuals discovering the joys of riding or walking on largely empty rural lanes and roads.
“However, Cycling UK is receiving regular reports of a minority of people driving way too fast. While reports of collisions are few, with so many families venturing out for their daily exercise especially on narrow rural roads, the consequences of dangerous driving now more than ever is a burden our NHS can ill afford.
“Worse still are the casualties we hear about. Without official figures it’s too early to say whether this is more than the usual. But even if it is less than ‘usual’, any death on our roads involving collisions with other vehicles is one too many.
“Quieter roads are not a licence to speed,” he added. “Cycling UK is appealing to all drivers to give plenty of space when overtaking walkers, cyclists and horse riders and slow down - you never know who could be just around the corner.”
Add new comment
41 comments
Fabulous use of the split infinitive there Fluffy, keep it up.
If infinitives weren't meant to be split, they would be a single word like they are in Latin.
I'm finding that most drivers are giving me more space than normal, being more patient and slowing down more than normal. I suspect these are key workers who spend their working lives looking after others and so have a more caring attitude to everyone.
There are some drivers, however, that feel they are entitled to use our newly found clear roads without the hindrance of any "obstructions". I had a beeping motorcyclist and a close pass from an Iceland delivery van all because a number of cyclists happened to be grouped at the lights at a cross roads (I happened to catch up a small and relatively inexperienced cycling family) and we must have slowed them down by a few seconds.
I suspect (and I'm breaking my normal rule of having no supporting data) that there will be fewer incidents at the moment but those incidents will be more serious.
I have been meaning to get my cameras set up on my bike - not used them for years but shorter outings and these kind of issues mean they make more sense.
In all fairness (sorry), I don't think that those drivers only dislike cyclists.
I've been driving much more (yes, I know, I keep going on about it) and I've been obeying the speed limits. I have been tailgated and overtaken dangerously by other motorists, pretty much on every journey and even within the city centre, which is far more than I ever recall happening before The Lockdown.
The increase in average speeds is certainly a risk factor. The Met police reported increase in average speed in 20mph zones to 37mph equates to a rise in probability of fatal injury for a pedestrian in a collision from 7% to 31%, and much the same for cyclists.
Sadly, we are seeing similar tragic outcomes here in Australia. Year to date, cyclist fatalities are up 60% in NSW, and 50% in Victoria. Pedestrian fatalities in NSW are also higher, up 44% year to date. But the trend has been moving in the wrong direction for a number of years now. If you’ve got rising cyclist deaths during a period where traffic is 1/7 the usual level, then you’ve got serious structural issues regardless. We’ve got to take a long term view on this, and not simply treat the present circumstances as causality.
There is another factor which may be contributing to this high level of fatalities, the lack of experience of these new or returning cyclists. An experienced cyclist has an almost instinctual knowledge of what is safe and what is dangerous, built up over many years, and adjusts their behaviour accordingly. A new or returning cyclist doesn't have the knowledge and is far more likely to make wrong decisions.
I agree. As I work from home anyway, my cycling habits of many years haven't changed at all, but it's impossible not to notice the number of cyclists now on the roads compared to a month ago. Many couples and family groups. It's obvious lots of them haven't done much riding and I suppose they see this as an opportunity to dust off the bikes and get some exercise in. Most experienced cyclists (ie regularly riding longish distances for several years) will know how much experience and hard-learned road skills count towards staying alive and (mostly) uninjured. When combined with a small number of idiot drivers and and the usual lunatics, this rash of enthusiastic new cyclists can make a lethal mix.
It may have just been a coincidence, but two days after the lockdown was announced I was riding down a very quiet country lane and a car came round the corner on my side of the road. While far from an unknown event, it still took a calm, but quick reaction from me, requiring a fairly deft swing to the left to get down the small gap I had left to carry on unscathed. I do wonder though what might have happened if I had been a couple of parents and their two kids, or even just a chap who, the week before thought he'd take advantage of the 'new normal' by buying a bike and taking up cycling.
Even though statistically there are less cars on the road, i am finding the ones that remain are driving way above the speed limit.
Its sad but actually its safer to have more cars on the road as they are forced to move significantly slower.
Very much this - there is actually a sweetspot of traffic density / volume that means most drivers obey the road traffic laws, speed limits etc but don't get too riled by stop-start traffic, congestion etc.
Drop below that volume and you get empty roads which are then interpreted as a racetrack by some. Go above that sweetspot and you get lots of congestion and the corresponding rise in road rage and also in speeding between congestion (the attitude of being stuck for an hour then finding a free-flowing stretch of road and flooring it to "make up time").
I think you're both on the nose there.
Until the police, CPS and judiciary stop letting bad drivers off with a pat on the head, a bottle of vodka and a free holiday then we'll see no let up in these figures.
On a local rural A-road I actually hit the abort button and doubled back on the (deserted) pavement. I just figured the risk of a life-changing collision was too real. It almost felt worse on the pavement (throttled by overgrowth of the adjacent field) as vehicles thundered passed with no sense of obligation at all, rather like when you are in one of those 80cm painted cycle lanes. I guess for some car drivers there is a sense of "for once in my life, no traffic" and they are not going to let a mere bicycle change that for them. Most, by far, are OK, but that leaves enough to have me feeling very unsafe on that particular road.
Pages