Update, 13/09/21, 5:44pm: a Wiltshire Police spokesman has now responded after being asked for comment. The full statement is below, and the original article appears underneath it.
“In line with national policy, in cases of common assault with no injury, where the offender is identified and fully admits the offence, then an adult caution is deemed a suitable outcome.
“We are committed to providing a high level of service for all victims of crime, and if any victim is dissatisfied with the service they have received then they can make a formal complaint via the Office for the Police and Crime Commissioner.”
A shocking video shows a cyclist being punched multiple times in the face by a driver who was enraged that he was riding two abreast in a group.
Ady Short's wife, who was riding in front of the car, was also knocked off her bike by the driver as he attacked her husband through the car window.
Mr Short was out with his wife and six other Swindon Wheelers club members when the driver of a black Nissan caught up with them on a bendy section of road where he was unable to overtake.
Mr Short said: "He followed us for about 90 seconds, overtook us and braked hard in front of the group causing us to swerve around him but as we rode around him he took off again within the group causing further issues whilst remonstrating about us not singling out (he wouldn’t have got past one person let alone eight through the bendy section)."
While this, as Mr Short pointed out is, sadly, an all too common occurrence for cyclists on Britain's roads, what happened next was shocking.
> Aggressive driver in total meltdown with Carmarthenshire cyclists after close pass
Mr Short continued: "As club secretary and a trained Ride Lead we’re meant to de-escalate any situations so normally (happens too often) we wait to hear what they say and then explain why we were riding two abreast.
"He was very angry as you can see but before I could explain he started hitting me, I just suffered a black eye as a result and didn’t actually get the chance to say anything before he hit me.
"He also knocked my wife off her bike, the camera was hers and she suffered cuts and bruises but wasn’t considered part of the case as the police couldn’t actually see her.
"We made the guy wait as the police were called and told him when he tried to drive off that he would end up in more trouble."
> Police install 'give cyclists room' signs...local asks for 'cyclists single file' version
Mr Short said he had been told by Wiltshire Police that the driver 'fully admitted' the assault and claimed to be very remorseful.
The driver was only handed a caution for the unprovoked attack.
Mr Short said the group were looking into appealing the seemingly light punishment.
He also explained why he had tried to talk to the driver in the first place.
He said: "Generally, in our experience, it just humanises the situation if we can let them blow off steam and appear calm, we usually explain that we all drive cars as well and apologise for any inconvenience even though we shouldn’t have to apologise it just seems to take the anger out of the situation.
"Its a case by case basis as to whether we talk about must and should where the highway code is concerned, this guy was absolutely adamant that we must ride single file which is what he was shouting about as I cycled by him...
"What took the steam out of this situation more than anything post fracas was my wife shouting that we had cameras."
Wiltshire Police have been contacted for comment.
Update, 13/09/2021: We've had a huge response to this article, with many readers expressing shock and distress, plus surprise at the response from Wiltshire Police. You can contact the office for the Wiltshire Police and Crime Commissioner here, and if you were directly affected, you can make a complaint here.
Add new comment
205 comments
I haven't read all the comments yet so forgive me, but if it was a windy road then he couldn't have overtaken safely even if they'd been in single file, surely? He would have still (as he did) have had until there was a straight bit and no oncoming traffic. So what they were doing made no f-ing difference!
(that's better - got it off my chest)
Definitely appeal. I had a truck driver try to put me under his wheels three times, then mount the pavement and drive into the hedgerow to block me off, he got out, punched me and I fell to the ground. He reached over and went to punch me again but I caught him in the crotch with a well aimed kick.
I had no video evidence, but 5 independent witnesses. He left the scene but somebody got his reg.
He avoided all attempts by the police to contact him until his wife was told they would put an ANPR marker on his car and he would be stopped and arrested if he pinged an ANPR camera anywhere in the country. He eventually presented himself for interview at the police station but denied it all.
Taken to court, and obviously after eventually getting legal advice pleaded guilty.
He got a 12 week prison sentence suspended for 12 months.
His licence was revoked for 12 months. The Traffic Commissioner (who has greater powers than th courts) was going to be advised by the police that his HGV licence should be revoked for life (the police said the TC ALWAYS listens to their advice)
He was fined over £1200 (which I subsequently found comes to me! N+1 fund coffers expanded nicely thank you!).
He was sacked by his employer. And if the TC revokes his HGV for good will never drive a truck again on our roads.
He admitted he had 'anger management issues'. No shit. Right result if you ask me.
So the victim here should definitely appeal. Why no assault charge with video evidence is unbelievable.
So you are singlehandely to blame for the shortage in lorry drivers. And fancy going after his employment. Boo wouldn't be pleased at all.
Anyone else noticed the perversity that the first thing called for was to increase the allowed driving hours of these already overworked, tired and succeptable to anger, frustrated drivers?
Surely we should be asking our neighbouring countries if they could send us their spare drivers?
Tories wanking at the opportunity of deregulation. What do you expect?
Err, I never went after anything. I merely reported the incident to the police, made my statement and gave the witness details. I had nothing more to do with it.
Sorry PP, I should realise not everyone is as sad as a core few on here who look at all the comments on all the stories. Quick catchup was somebody stated it is wrong to target someones livelihood even if they posted on a public forum they would take said employer-supplied equipment and run over cyclists any chance they get.
I really hope the group appeals this appallingly lenient "sentence". That driver needs banning and retesting if he cannot control his rage when driving.
There is no way to appeal. All that can be done is submit a complaint to the police.
As above, go after the driver in a civil claim to knacker his insurance.
There must be some damage to one of the bikes as a minimum submit a claim to his insurance company for a respray with this as evidence.
There is also injury, and damage to clothing due to hitting the deck. Gloves is a good one. Photos of injuries works wonders for insurance claims.
The claim won't be rejected with that footage.
I am a criminal defence solicitor. This is obviously NOT a cautionable offence- it's road rage and multiple assault. Even if it was cautionable a caution should only be administered with the victims consent. Nothing in the article indicates consent. The victim should write to the duty inspector asking for immediate explanation as to what has happened and seek a review. I would also report this to the local police crime commissioner.
How something as unprovoked, unexpected, unnecessary and unpleasant got away with just a caution is unbelievable! Even if the piss-poor driving didn't warrant points, surely the assault did! Why does the law continue to refuse to protect us?
As I've previously suggested, is either in the same lodge as the chief constable, or possibly a police themselves or a close relative.
When I was physically assaulted on my bike and reported it to the police, the driver didn't even get a caution ... he admitted the assault but told the policeman he was sorry and that was the end if it. Clear video of the guy speeding. Clear video of them throwing a projectile that hit me on the head. 4 inches lower I'd be blind, concussed, maybe dead but because it luckily hit my helmet and I wasn't injured the aggressive driver just gets away with it.
Another reason not to wear a helmet......
Hmm, not a great result. How much of an inconvenience getting a caution for assault is, depends a lot on personal circumstances.
If you're self-employed or a scroat, then not much impact. If you're employed as a professional or in a sensitive role, it could mean losing your job, or not being able to move job or gain promotion for the 6 years it stays on record.
"but wasn’t considered part of the case as the police couldn’t actually see her. "
So the death knell for dashcam footage and helmetcam footage.
I'm glad Wilstshire Police cleared that up.
They are an absoute disgrace - driver commited multiple offences but gets off scott free.
He needs a long ban and an extensive retest.
Yes, bikes are known for just riding along by themselves with no one on them,
This is definite complaint worthy. Unprovoked assault. Knocking down another road user whilst driving dangerously (one hand off the wheel and not looking forward) let alone the brake checks. Police reponse - Well he said sorry and didn't mean it.
Actually you do see her because when she get knocked off by the driver you see her foot, under the car.
Could be anyone's foot (I'm sure that's how the defense would go).
Just a caution for a road rage assault? Some time performing community service would have sent a stronger message and ensured that they spent at least some time thinking about their childish behaviour.
That driver has demonstrated an inability to control his emotions while at the controls of a deadly weapon and so, as a minimum, should be banned from operating same ever again. The preceding sentence would be considered the only rational response were this a society of a species that didn't evolve from shit-flinging, status-obsessed monkeys. But, being as that is not the case, of course he'll be allowed to keep possession of this thing that gives him status, and be allowed to continue flinging his shit around. Until, that is, the day he kills another one of the hairless apes, at which point one of the higher status monkeys may choose to punish him for reducing the size of the tribe, if they decide his victim wasn't so low status that it is not worth bothering.
I think between them they could ensure an insurance payout to make his driving in future to be prohibitively expensive. Damage to several bikes, kit and the concussion and injuries from the assaults plus significant psychological trauma. Which would be a shame
Pages