A recent poll has indicated that cyclists are perceived to be among Ireland’s most dangerous road users, with around a fifth of those surveyed claiming that people on bikes represent the greatest threat on the country’s roads, just behind young male motorists and e-scooter users.
However, the poll, conducted by insurance company Aviva, also found that younger people are less likely to view cyclists as dangerous compared to older road users.
While 21 percent of those surveyed who are 55 and older reckon cyclists are the most dangerous group on the roads, only eight percent of people aged 18 to 24 believe the same to be true, suggesting an intriguing generational shift in Irish attitudes towards cycling.
Despite the promising outlook among younger people, in most of the other categories – grouped by Aviva by age, location, or gender – cyclists were routinely regarded as the second-most dangerous group on the roads.
For instance, 18 percent of female respondents classed cyclists on the top of the danger list, as did 17 percent of the 35-44 age group. 20 percent of people living in Munster – the home province of Sean Kelly and Sam Bennett – also ticked the cyclists box.
> What will kill you on the road (it’s not bikes) – new report highlights road deaths by vehicles involved
Overall, of the 1,000 people surveyed, 34 percent said that young men driving cars represent the greatest danger on Ireland’s roads, followed by e-scooters users (20 percent) and cyclists (17 percent). At the bottom of the danger pile lies middle-aged female drivers – viewed by only one percent of respondents as the most dangerous group on the road – followed, oddly enough, by pedestrians (two percent).
Of course, Aviva’s decision to split motorists into age-defined categories has had a considerable impact on the rankings (they neglected, for example, to include a separate category for middle-aged cyclists). Unsurprisingly, when combined into one group, motorists are perceived to pose the greatest threat on the roads by 61 percent of respondents.
2022 saw 155 people die on Ireland’s roads, a 13 percent increase on the previous year’s total of 136, which was the lowest number of fatalities since records began in 1959. Of the 155 people killed, seven were cyclists and 41 were pedestrians, over double the number of pedestrians killed in 2021.
> Cyclist hit by truck driver has compensation cut after judge says lack of helmet contributed to injuries
Earlier this year, the chairperson of the Irish government’s Road Safety Authority Liz O’Donnell, said that the figures for 2022, which also recorded that almost 1,300 people were seriously injured on Ireland’s roads, “should serve as a reminder to us all of our shared responsibility to always be safety aware on our roads, and to pay special attention to motorcyclists, cyclists, and pedestrians”.
She continued: “We simply must get back on track and reverse the increase in deaths. It means that all of us must accept greater responsibility when using the road and become custodians and champions for safety on the road.”
Aviva’s Billy Shannon echoed those sentiments in a statement released alongside the insurance company’s survey.
“Behind each of these dreadful statistics are families and friends whose lives have changed forever following the untimely deaths of their loved ones,” Shannon said.
“We can only hope that the doubling of fines for speeding and other traffic offences announced by the Department of Transport last October will have a positive impact and encourage drivers to abide by the rules of the road and in turn, help save lives.”
> Bus company investigates employee filmed driving on cycle lane and pavement
While the Irish government has attempted to crack down on speeding, especially on rural roads, in recent months by increasing fines, it appears that little is being done to stop dangerous driving around cyclists.
In December it was reported that motorists in Ireland had received just 71 fines in three years for dangerous overtaking of cyclists.
Provisional figures from An Garda Síochána suggested that just 14 fixed charge notices were issued for the offence in 2022, with 32 issued in 2019 and 2020, and 25 last year.
Phil Skelton from Safe Cycling Ireland said the “year-by-year drop” in the number of fines issued was disappointing and “we have certainly not seen any substantial evidence that this road safety issue has alleviated to such a degree as to warrant this decrease”.
> Shocking footage shows cyclist deliberately knocked off bike by laughing driver
In October and November, three instances of shockingly dangerous driving – either around or directly aimed at cyclists – in Ireland went viral, leading to calls from politicians to focus future road safety campaigns on the behaviour of motorists.
In Dublin, a bus company launched a “full investigation” after one of its employees was filmed driving a double-decker bus on both the cycle lane and footpath in order to undertake a queue of traffic, while a few weeks later in Dundalk shocking footage emerged of what appeared to be a motorist – laughing while filming the incident himself – deliberately ramming a cyclist off his bike.
A month before, Gardaí arrested a man after another driver appeared to deliberately strike a cyclist from behind near Dublin Airport, before fleeing the scene, as one of the car’s passengers filmed the collision on their phone.
Footage of the incident was later posted online and shared widely on social media. It appears to show the driver approaching the cyclist at speed as a passenger is heard to say: “Here we go, watch, watch, watch”. A bang follows as the driver rams the unsuspecting cyclist from behind, before someone says, “Gone, go, we’re gone”. The cyclist was taken to hospital, where he was treated for “non-life threatening” injuries.
Add new comment
27 comments
I can see where this perception comes from.
Motorists, no matter how many lives they took from reckless driving to pollution, they demand all road be theirs and the sidewalk be their free parking place and pedestrians... are very odd.
Firstly, pedestrians do not ague much about the cars running or parking on the sidewalks and other pedestrian-only areas.
Perhaps in fear? A can can easily be a lethal weapon...
Secondly, pedestrians are very odd. And I include in this behaviour, motorists that jut got off their cars, cyclists without bicycles or dismounted:
I often find myself obligated to ride on the sidewalks. That is illegal but so are the motorists driving and parking on the sidewalk. Nevertheless I do not ride on the sidewalk like on the road. At most, I ride at brisk walking pace, never trying to squeeze between pedestrians, stop and give way and so on.
And so very often, incoming pedestrians act like they saw a tank rampaging towards them. The jump aside, making horrified faces... And I'm either standing or riding at walking pace signaling and saying "please, carry on, I'm in no hurry"
Maybe the fear of being bumped by a cyclist is far greater that that of being squashed by 2 tonnes of iron.
The weird thing is that, it is completely opposed for pedestrians on the road.
Obviously, every vehicle here is moving at a lot more than walking speed but, because the sidewalk might be blocked by cars or just because some feel like it, many times there are pedestrians in the middle of the bloody lane or crossing chaotically.
I can literally yell, swear, honk, flash my lights at them. Completely NPCs... I have a dude driving 45 behind me, I can't just pop in front if him to swerve the oblivious walker... and the pedestrian is like "What? Just go around me."
There is actually a use to this survey. It can be proven that public opinion is a worthless test of priorities for road safety.
Twitterati conspiracy theorists please note.
But it can't as
1. It is a terrible survey
2. You can't "prove" anything anyway
You can show actual road stats of KSI's and show that opinion is entirely unrelated to reality. That's near enough proof for me that opinion rarely correlates to fact. However, we are living in the post-factual world where opinion is more important than reality.
These survey are just self perpetuating nonsense. All they do is highlight the attitudes, lack of empathy or basic cognitive dissonance of drivers that lies directly at the heart of the many and constant threats that are posed to cyclists by drivers worldwide. All they are is another piece of evidence highlighting the serious social challenges than come with any attempt to ween people off cars or ask them to even consider an alternative for some trips, heck, even just try to make life easier for those who are using bikes, given the constantly presented fallacy that when faced with a 100kg bicycle and rider in close proximity to (and generally, being overtaken by) a 1500kg car, the rider is the source of danger.
I've only read the headline so far and I notice you've misspelt 'endangered'.
Now I'll read what I imagine is an excellent article on people's care and concern for their fellow human beings not protected by a metal box when they travel.
Seems like a particularly stupid question designed to pander to lazy, unsupported prejudice*. Ultimately people with no regard for others and selfish attitudes are capable of being the most dangerous road users regardless of the mode of transport.
* Personally, anything with 4 rings, a Q in the model name, painted in a mind numbingly dull shade of grey spells trouble. I also harbour a loathing of black X5s, not that there seem to be many of those left right side up.
This is a terrible survey as pointed out in the article. Why give it the oxygen of publicity, especially with the misleading headline?
I could see how looking at it could be instructive from a "how not to write a survey" point of view, but not with the headline this article has been given
Also if you are interested in the question "what is the most dangerous type of vehicle on the road" even a well written survey is not the way to find that out. Instead you measure how many deaths and injuries each vehicle type causes
If there's any useful information to be hand from this survey it's about the level of motorist paranoid schizophrenia in Ireland.
My perception is that drivers do stupid things, things that they shouldn't do, things that violate the rules of the road, then blame it on the cylist. For instance, passing a cyclist despite there not being enough room because of traffic coming against them. The road rules are that they wait until it is safe to pass, but these are people who haven't taken a road test in 20 or 30 years, and many much older drivers have never taken a road test because there was an amnesty in the 80s. They believe a cyclist should be on the footpath or some place else but not on the road. They are a hazard to themselves but wouldn't be if they just stayed off the road. That is the attitude. Ignorance.
Welcome Lawrence. A very fine first post.
I also think they somewhat panic. We might encounter one or two hundred motor vehicles on a short ride, representing the full gamut of abilities/aggression. They might encounter one or two cyclists a week. And they were never really given specific training of what to do around us anyway.
Are we talking about Eire here or the UK Lawrence?
I read somewhere that you're not supposed to call it "Eire", just "Ireland (the Republic of...)"
It's complex: Éire is the correct name for the Republic of Ireland in Irish Gaelic and is enshrined in Article IV of the 1937 constitution alongside the state being known as Ireland in the English language. Trouble arose because the UK government insisted at that time on using Éire as the name of the state rather than Ireland to make it clear that they did not accept "Ireland" as a name as that might imply that the whole island of Ireland was a single entity. The UK government didn't alter this policy until the Good Friday agreement. Basically if you're calling the Republic Éire in good faith it's not really a problem, if you're using that name to make a political point that Ireland is still two separate entities it is. Generally best to say the Republic of Ireland or just Ireland if speaking English, otherwise it's like saying Deutschland or España when you mean Germany or Spain.
Complex is rather understated 😉
It's the Republic of Ireland. In 1979 an amnesty from taking a test was declared due to a backlog caused by a postal strike. Also testing wasn't introduced until 1964. All you did was show up at the post office with a shilling. There's rumours of another amnesty due to the Covid backlog though I reckon highly unlikely. Here's an article I found. https://www.mayonews.ie/comment-opinion/down-memory-lane/35771-the-great...
When I lived in Ireland the NCT test (equivelant of MOT) never existed either; and the wondered why Ireland at the time had one of the worst road deaths in Europe 🙄
Thank you Mr Giff, I was in my prime at that time, with a fully functioning memory and a degree of common sense. The very idea of forgetting such a thing was rather unsettling.
No separate category for drunk motorists? Audi drivers?
You mean 'are cyclists a threat to drunk motorists?', 'are cyclists a threat to Audi drivers?'
Only if they get out.
I'm not convinced that they ever do... I think they just live in there.
This from a country where even double decker bus drivers use the pavements to jump queues.
Dangerous to whom?
Clearly not a threat to motorists (except if they have a camera, as OFG has said below).
Did they mean a threat to pedestrians? Has Ireland had many more incidents of cyclist hits pedestrian? (I'm sure that would have been in the news...).
If cyclists are so dangerous, why do drivers insist on going too close to them :-/?
Our cameras make us more dangerous than our soft, squishy bodies.
We're dangerous because there's now no hiding away from shit, life-threatening or distracted driving being reported (OK, enforcement is another thing).