Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Jail for speeding driver who killed Cambridge cyclist

Miles Polite imprisoned for three years after admitting causing the death of Stewart Milne by dangerous driving

A Cambridgeshire driver who had just overtaken another car at speed when he struck and killed a cyclist has been jailed for three years.

Miles Polite, aged 28 and from Burwell, was sentenced today after pleading guilty to causing the death by dangerous driving of 44 year old cyclist Stewart Milne from Cambridge.

The fatal crash happened at around 10.20pm on the evening of 12 December 2017 on Trumpington High Street, at the junction with Maris Lane.

Polite, who stopped at the scene and called emergency services, told a call handler: “I hit the guy, he was going across the pedestrian crossing but it was a green light.”

Mr Milne, a father of three and a keen cyclist, was taken to hospital but died from his injuries two days later.

In an interview at the roadside, Polite told police officers that he “might have been going a bit too fast.”

Subsequent enquiries revealed that he would have been driving at around 45mph in a 30mph zone.

Witnesses also told officers that shortly before the crash, Polite, who was driving a yellow Ford Focus, had overtaken another vehicle at speed by entering a right turn-only lane.

Besides the jail sentence, Polite has also been banned from driving for four and a half years.

PC Sean Redman of Cambridgeshire Constabulary said: “This is an incredibly tragic case which sadly resulted in the death of a man who has left behind a loving partner and young family.

“At the time of the collision, it was dark and rainy and Polite was driving over the designated speed limit.

“This highlights just how vital it is for motorists drive to the conditions of the road in order to prevent awful instances like this from occurring.”

He added: “We attend incidents of this nature far too regularly and I would encourage all road users to share the road and always drive in accordance of the law.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

8 comments

Avatar
Jenova20 | 4 years ago
4 likes

He gets 3 years, but the other guy who rammed 4 cyclists head on got less than that. This sentencing is waaay too lenient on these "drivers".

Avatar
brooksby | 4 years ago
1 like

Quote:

Witnesses also told officers that shortly before the crash, Polite, who was driving a yellow Ford Focus, had overtaken another vehicle at speed by entering a right turn-only lane.

But that sort of thing happens so often (overtake in restricted lane, undertake anywhere, wrong side of traffic island, &c.) that I'd just presumed it was taught in driving lessons... 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 4 years ago
15 likes

A terrible case, both for the victim and the perpetrator, whom I am sure didn't mean to kill an innocent party.  We must examine why so many people think that they can drive so badly, threatening the lives of others, but feel no sense of responsibility as they do.  There is this terrible disconnect between actions and the perceived outcomes of those actions.  Either that, or they know what they are doing can kill, but don't care.

Avatar
Spokesperson replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
1 like

If only nominative determinism had worked for Miles that evening, he would not have killed Stewart Milne, and three youngsters would still have their dad around.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to eburtthebike | 4 years ago
9 likes

I think there's a Dunning-Kruger element to this.

"I'm a good driver. Therefore I can drive harder, faster closer, and not have a crash. Cos I'm a good driver."

Many people don't get that driving is 90% assessment of risk, and predicting and mitigating possibilities. 

"he/she drives slower, cos they aren't good drivers. I'm better so I can drive faster"

Most people can't even define what being a "good driver" entails, only that they know they are one, whatever it is.

 

Avatar
Housecathst replied to Captain Badger | 4 years ago
4 likes

The "I'm a good driver thing" is a  massive part of the problem, there have been numerous studies that show the majority of drivers thing their better than average. I think this is also an issue with judges and jury's too, they thing I'm a good driver and I  look at text messages, speed abit etc etc and apply there own dreadfully low standards to the killer in the dock. 

Avatar
TheBillder replied to Housecathst | 4 years ago
2 likes

Exactly this - "there but for the grace of God go I". It would help hugely if all of us who drive could realise how difficult and challenging it is, and to do it safely we need total concentration, good training and good eyesight. And most of us are deficient in at least one of those.

And I should add: if all we drivers knew that we were likely to be punished properly for our transgressions, perhaps attitudes would change.

Avatar
Luca Patrono replied to Captain Badger | 4 years ago
4 likes
Captain Badger wrote:

Most people can't even define what being a "good driver" entails, only that they know they are one, whatever it is.

Pretty much the definition right there. If you think you're good at something, but you can't articulate what it is that makes you good where others can be bad, it's Dunning-Kruger.

Latest Comments