Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

"A massive opportunity to make roads safer": Police reveal councils don't currently have access to close pass data, as cyclist urges forces and local authorities to work together

Do local authorities need access to police data on close passes and other roads incidents to protect cyclists and plan effective infrastructure?

Should councils have access to police close pass data in order to assist in planning infrastructure to make the roads safer? That's the question a cyclist has posed after discovering his local council cannot currently access information such as close pass reports made to the area's police force.

It is something that, from the outside, sounds like an easy win for all involved; the local authorities who have to propose, plan, design and implement roads schemes and policies under tight financial and time restrictions benefitting from another source of information to inform projects. For example, noticing patterns in close pass data such as where most incidents occur, which roads in their area are particularly bad or most dangerous for cyclists — all making sure bike lanes and other infrastructure is built in the right places.

For the police, better infrastructure in more optimal locations and designed to keep cyclists safe would likely address commonly occurring issues on often-cited routes, presumably reducing reports and the demand on the force to respond.

> Everything you need to know about bike cameras — how to choose, tips for recording quality footage and what to do if you capture a near miss, close pass or collision

In fact, as road.cc reader Stef Marazzi suggested to us, it seems so intuitive that there would be information-sharing between police forces and councils, he had always assumed this was already the case. 

He explained how he asked South Gloucestershire Council "if they actually used any of the close pass data the police get from thousands of close pass submissions?"

"I was always under the understanding that it was shared, but it's not," Stef continued. "It seems like such a massive opportunity to make the roads safer, by mapping out where there are close passes to improve the roads. Otherwise, how on earth can they plan where to put safer paths if they completely ignore a load of data from thousands and thousands of close passes that's been available for years?"

Despite being South Gloucestershire by name, much of the area's policing is covered by Avon & Somerset Police, the force explaining to us that ideally convenient data access would be available to councils and the public.

Close pass on cyclists during training ride, County DownClose pass on cyclists during training ride, County Down (credit: Twitter: @CyclingDown))

A spokesperson said they happily share any data when it is requested but that councils "do not currently have direct access to our Qlik system".

"We provide close pass data whenever it is requested and continue to make this offer," they said. "We have a longstanding desire to create a public-facing platform for both the public and local authorities to have access to this data. Although it is a complex project, it is one we are actively exploring. There is no national standard for the provision of police data to councils, but we recognise its benefits and continue to provide it as needed."

When we contacted South Gloucestershire Council for their thoughts a spokesperson said the police would be best placed to comment, however the responses to the local authority's cycle forum shows the council's desire for access to the data as soon as possible.

> "A close pass isn't an offence and a lot of cyclists don’t realise that": Police chief's "odd" claim that cyclists need education on driving offences highlighted as evidence of UK’s current road safety "mess"

Stef had taken the chance to ask the council: "If they actually used any of the close pass data the police get from thousands of close pass submissions?"

The reply to his question stated: "Our Road Safety team have confirmed that Avon & Somerset Police hold this data on a database called Qlik. It was anticipated that local authorities would have access to this database but this has not yet happened. Local authorities can request reports from the police but this tends to be high-level and doesn't include close pass data. The team will continue to press for access to the Qlik database."

It was also suggested that council staff could access some close pass data via other means, such as through the UpRide incident database which could be "a useful source of data", but this data is not direct from the police reports.

In the autumn it was revealed that Avon & Somerset Police received the most Operation SNAP reports between 2021 and 2024, with 19,949, the force having received 8,498 reports in 2023/24 alone.

Cyclist films close pass and phone use Cyclist films close pass and phone use (credit: magnatom/YouTube)

Of the nearly 20,000 reports, 12,154 (61 per cent) came from cyclists, with 4,662 of the total 19,949 leading to a Notice of Intended Prosecution being served. In total, 85 per cent of the reports made by cyclists led to "some form of action" (in comparison to a quarter of submissions from motorists that were dismissed), while almost a third of the force's reports came from Bristol.

In February, responding to the growing number of reports, Avon and Somerset Police said the local community is "speaking really loudly" about dangerous behaviour on the roads.

Chief inspector Rob Cheeseman said: "I think that's due to just how more popular certain camera use is. The goal is not to be targeting drivers unnecessarily – the ultimate goal is making the roads safer for everyone in Avon and Somerset."

Dan is the road.cc news editor and joined in 2020 having previously written about nearly every other sport under the sun for the Express, and the weird and wonderful world of non-league football for The Non-League Paper. Dan has been at road.cc for four years and mainly writes news and tech articles as well as the occasional feature. He has hopefully kept you entertained on the live blog too.

Never fast enough to take things on the bike too seriously, when he's not working you'll find him exploring the south of England by two wheels at a leisurely weekend pace, or enjoying his favourite Scottish roads when visiting family. Sometimes he'll even load up the bags and ride up the whole way, he's a bit strange like that.

Add new comment

14 comments

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 8 hours ago
2 likes

What a sad conicidence. This just turned up on the local news site.

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/regional-news/boy-14-dies-aft...

Whatever they do for road safety from now on will be too late for this poor lad. Obviously we don't know the details but once again the cyclist is reported as having collided with a car and not a driver.

Avatar
wtjs replied to Bungle_52 | 7 hours ago
0 likes

What a sad coincidence...

There's a lot of cyclist deaths about, and they always miss out the bit about the cyclist being 'smashed into by a driver'- this one was reported as a crash between a van and a cyclist on the A6 at Catterall.

There are other coincidences about; hands up who thinks this morning's illegal-plate close-passing Audi Panzer driver of CD10 WER is in the same family as illegal-plate mobile-phone-offending Porsche Panzer driver here

https://upride.cc/incident/kd10wer_porsche_mobilephone/

Avatar
mitsky | 11 hours ago
0 likes

Another easy win:

Link all petrol station CCTV to the national database of registered vehicles.
The system can flag up any cars/drivers wanted for road incidents etc and tag it/them to whoever pays for fuel on their card and also get the CCTV to take pics of the payer.

I've suggested this to authorities but they have no interest even though this system/tech should be easy to roll out.
Presumably because HMRC makes more money from fuel tax than it would by taking wanted drivers/vehicles off the road.

Avatar
stonojnr replied to mitsky | 10 hours ago
0 likes

Though it likely would increase the problem of cloned plates

Avatar
BikingBud replied to mitsky | 7 hours ago
0 likes

mitsky wrote:

Another easy win:

Link all petrol station CCTV to the national database of registered vehicles.
The system can flag up any cars/drivers wanted for road incidents etc and tag it/them to whoever pays for fuel on their card and also get the CCTV to take pics of the payer.

I've suggested this to authorities but they have no interest even though this system/tech should be easy to roll out.
Presumably because HMRC makes more money from fuel tax than it would by taking wanted drivers/vehicles off the road.

Kind of like the idea but feel it is getting a bit too much into "Enemy of the State"

There currently exists sufficient tech to address the issues and especially to capture and follow up registred keeper information. After all the private parking industry are screwing the motoring public for private parking charges and turning it into a massive golden goose: parking-tickets-fines-parking

But tech without intent or desire is useless.

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 12 hours ago
2 likes

Well I'm not sure they'll be able to get the info if they are anything like (North) Gloucestershire. Here is the response from a FOI request I made. It seems they can't even do the most basic of searches on the database.

On 13/02/2025 you sent an email constituting a request under the Freedom of Information
Act asking the following:
I would like to request the following information for OpSnap reports from cyclists to
Gloucestershire Constabulary in 2024;
1) Number of submissions made via the portal, broken down by month, where the
response to the mandatory question "At the time of this incident I was..." was "At the time of this incident I was a cyclist" on the Opsnap form.
2) The disposal for each of these reports giving the date, the nature of the report (eg. close pass), the disposal and any reasons for NFA.

The response

Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 s1, I can confirm that Gloucestershire
Constabulary may hold some relevant information.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to electronically search for the information requested regarding the mandatory question of "At the time of this incident I was..." was "At the time of this incident I was a cyclist". To identify and retrieve the requested information, a manual review of all opsnap records would be required.

This would involve the review of hundreds of records and would therefore take far longer than the 18 hours prescribed by the Freedom of Information Act

For those unfamiliar with Op Snap one of the fields that has to be filled in is "At the time of the offence I was" and one of the options is "A cyclist"

I've put in another since just asking for a few fields from all reports and I'll search it manually if it is successful as it seems they can only do PDFs.

On a different note I've been wondering why my reports are taking longer for them to process recently. This may be the answer :

https://www.gloucestershirelive.co.uk/news/gloucester-news/gloucestershi...

Avatar
mdavidford replied to Bungle_52 | 10 hours ago
1 like

Bungle_52 wrote:

For those unfamiliar with Op Snap one of the fields that has to be filled in is "At the time of the offence I was" and one of the options is "A cyclist"

"But I'm better now"

Avatar
wtjs replied to Bungle_52 | 10 hours ago
0 likes

On a different note I've been wondering why my reports are taking longer for them to process recently

It's deliberate- the Holy Grail for the various Operations Snap around the country  is that 'due to pressure of work' it's always too late to do anything about the road traffic offence. Op Snap Lancs has been claiming that for years until it hit on the more efficient solution of ignoring all submissions, just like it did with this one

https://upride.cc/incident/kn21axh_lancspolice_closepass/

They would prefer to simply block people they dislike for repeatedly reporting offences that Lancashire Constabulary wants to Not Know About, such as  me, from making Op Snap reports at all but they can't because theirs is through a portal which manages Op Snap for several forces and they clearly don't have 'blocking powers'. This particular incident, for obvious reasons, as also reported through Lancashire's 'ReportItOnline'. The disposal system they have there for traffic offences is: the report is immediately 'Closed' by an un-named officer, and it was. They don't give a time for when it was closed, in order to cover their tracks, but it was within an hour or so- I knew what they would do, so I checked

Avatar
wtjs replied to Bungle_52 | 8 hours ago
0 likes

It seems they can't even do the most basic of searches on the database...

I have made many FoI requests over the years and you have to deny them the usual excuses for refusing- and 'it's too much work' is one of the most popular. My suggestion is to find a few of the most egregious offences and start hunting for what they didn't do about them, and why. Mine, as you know, is over what they did about this single offence

https://upride.cc/incident/4148vz_travellerschoicecoach_closepass/

and they have steadfastly refused to tell me, citing the usual GDPR. They're about to get the repeat request

Avatar
stonojnr | 23 hours ago
2 likes

the police barely do anything with close pass data, like just analyse the clear geographic hot spots and setup camera vehicles themselves.

What on earth do we think councils, most of whom can barely come up with decent cycling infra, will do with it ? put an extra sign up that says caution cyclists !?!

 

Avatar
mdavidford replied to stonojnr | 15 hours ago
4 likes

More likely "cyclists dismount and use footway".

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 14 hours ago
4 likes

"No bicycles beyond this point".

Lots of people pushing bikes on the pavement?  That'll get in the way of other pedestrians, it's a trip hazard and just imagine if someone dropped a bike on a child.

They can of course carry them on the back / top of their cars, on the road.

(Agree - it's as likely to be "find out where people are cycling, and stop them" as anything else in some places).

Avatar
open_roads | 1 day ago
3 likes

This is a great example of where public services can't be bothered to join up in order to drive the outcomes the public expect.

There are millions more examples of this sort of thing - people working in silos, head down and spending money on services that would be much more effective if they were joined up.

Avatar
Tom_77 | 1 day ago
1 like

Portsmouth Council collect data on Near Misses (walking and cycling). Not sure if they also have access to police data.

Latest Comments