Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Near Miss of the Day 643: Police officer pulls out on cyclist

Our regular series featuring close passes from around the country - today it's south London...

One of the more niche sub-genres in our Near Miss of the Day series comprises incidents in which the perpetrator is a police officer – there’s some examples here –and it’s always a bit of a head-scratcher given that they tend to be better trained than the average driver as well as being, you know, the people tasked with upholding the law.

So while today’s offering, which happened on Lilford Road in Camberwell, South London just after 8am this morning is by no means the worst example of driving we’ve featured in the series, we thought it was worth sharing.

As Rendel, the road.cc reader who posted the footage to Twitter says, “It’s not exactly a near miss (could have been if I hadn’t kept aware) but if the police can't be bothered to look for bikes or indicate before pulling out ...”

He added that he has lodged a formal complaint with the Metropolitan Police regarding the incident. 

> Near Miss of the Day turns 100 - Why do we do the feature and what have we learnt from it?

Over the years road.cc has reported on literally hundreds of close passes and near misses involving badly driven vehicles from every corner of the country – so many, in fact, that we’ve decided to turn the phenomenon into a regular feature on the site. One day hopefully we will run out of close passes and near misses to report on, but until that happy day arrives, Near Miss of the Day will keep rolling on.

If you’ve caught on camera a close encounter of the uncomfortable kind with another road user that you’d like to share with the wider cycling community please send it to us at info [at] road.cc or send us a message via the road.cc Facebook page.

If the video is on YouTube, please send us a link, if not we can add any footage you supply to our YouTube channel as an unlisted video (so it won't show up on searches).

Please also let us know whether you contacted the police and if so what their reaction was, as well as the reaction of the vehicle operator if it was a bus, lorry or van with company markings etc.

> What to do if you capture a near miss or close pass (or worse) on camera while cycling

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

130 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
10 likes

Following on from the "drivers taught to not always indicate to show that they are paying attention" discussion - I particularly hate it when drivers don't indicate when pulling out from a parked position. This instance is a good example where "always indicate" is safer for other road users.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
5 likes

Good lord!  You mean those flashy orange lights serve a genuine purpose?  Well I never...

Avatar
eburtthebike replied to brooksby | 3 years ago
5 likes

Not on BMWs in my experience.  Rumours of the man fitting the indicators on them being made redundant are rife.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
4 likes

But but if they've checked and assessed the situation first then it's OK if they're an advanced driver or trained police driver!

I'm sanguine about the police having to do it differently "in extremis" but they didn't have their blues on so it don't look like the Sweeney here. Just careless. Or "lacking courtesy" if you like.

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to hawkinspeter | 3 years ago
0 likes

You don't indicate if you know there is nobody going to be affected by your actions.

An advanced motorist is therefore proving the point that they were unaware of the approaching bike.

The exceptions suggested include signalling on a roundabout rather than trying to signal when spotting an approaching vehicle, so you are not distracted by the action.

Don't signal if your intention is ambiguous (e.g. changing lane just before a junction where an emerging car might make an assumption).

Avatar
jh2727 replied to IanMSpencer | 3 years ago
2 likes
IanMSpencer wrote:

You don't indicate if you know there is nobody going to be affected by your actions.

Perhaps, but pulling out from behind a parked vehicle, when parked on the righthand side of the road, into an oncoming traffic lane, with poor visibility - that is going to require indication everytime.

IanMSpencer wrote:

Don't signal if your intention is ambiguous (e.g. changing lane just before a junction where an emerging car might make an assumption).

The correct course of action there would be don't change lane - but if you must, you should definitely indicate. Otherwise the emerging driver will very like emerge into the lane that you are foolishly trying to move into. If I'm emerging from a junction and a car in the right hand lane is signalling left, there's no way I'm going to take that as a cue that it is safe to emerge, quite the opposite. Heck if there's a car in the left lane indicating left, I'm not going to emerge, unless I also see that they are reducing speed significantly (or already travelling slowly enough for me to emerge safely).

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to jh2727 | 3 years ago
0 likes

What would you do if you are turning left at traffic lights which are about 30 metres from the previous left junction, when the bus lane ends 5 metres before the previous junction?

I can assure you that signalling left gets drivers to pull out every time.

Try Google maps and have a look at Lode Lane approaching Solihull By-Pass and the relationship to Hermitage Road.

And I have done the Advanced Drivers Course and I am quoting their guidance.

Avatar
quiff replied to IanMSpencer | 3 years ago
3 likes
IanMSpencer wrote:

You don't indicate if you know there is nobody going to be affected by your actions.

The idea that you can know this, without room for any doubt whatsoever, bothers me. I understand that the idea is to get drivers to observe carefully and consider, rather than just indicating thoughtlessly as a matter of routine. But where is the harm in making careful observations and indicating, just in case you're, you know, human and fallible after all?

Avatar
IanMSpencer replied to quiff | 3 years ago
0 likes

The advanced driving philosophy is that if you don't know for sure, then you haven't observed.

I used to be a signal all the time, and not signalling forces you to properly consider your observation. Think about it. If you signal automatically, you just signal. If you signal if another road user is around, then you have a cue to make sure you have looked. If you really can't see, e.g. going around a wooded roundabout, then by all means signal, but the starting point is observation, not signalling.

Anyway, don't take it up with me, have a go at the police accredited testers for advanced driving and the likes of IAM. It is driving systematically, so every decision is deliberate.

Avatar
quiff replied to IanMSpencer | 3 years ago
2 likes

I wasn't taking issue with you personally, it was just convenient to quote the words you'd used. When I said 'you', I meant 'one'.  As I said, I understand the theory, but for most drivers, I don't see the harm in proper observations and indication. If you're a vulnerable road user who hasn't been seen, then it makes little difference if the person who failed to see you is an advanced motorist whose training tells them not to indicate, or a basic driver who just doesn't bother. Indicating offers a degree of protection from fallible drivers in both camps.   

Pages

Latest Comments