A recent survey conducted by a London law firm quizzed 2,000 UK road users and found that over half of British drivers as well as cyclists are still unaware of important Highway Code rules, with bus and lorry drivers the least aware of the road hierarchy.
The survey was conducted in February by Hodge Jones and Allen, solicitors specialising in personal injury and dispute resolution besides other things, and revealed that more than a year on, road users in the UK are still confused about the Highway Code changes.
The Highway Code changes were brought about by the UK Government on 29 January 2022 to improve road safety for people walking, cycling and riding horses following a public consultation. However ever since, the changes have been part of a heated debate as well as national press hysteria, with questions being raised if they have actually helped make active travel safer or not.
But what’s perhaps a little more clear is that people are still confused about them. According to the study, 54 per cent drivers and 60 per cent cyclists do not know the correct hierarchy of road users, with four in ten cyclists believing they take priority over pedestrians.
> Highway Code: 61% of drivers HAVE NOT read new rules, AA survey suggests
A significant 83 per cent of bus and lorry drivers could not identify the correct hierarchy of road users, with nearly half of them (47 per cent) believing they topped the road hierarchy. This comes as a rather troubling revelation that bus/lorry drivers know the least out of all road users about this aspect of the Highway Code rule, despite the size of the vehicles posing a threat to road users in case of a collision.
The Highway Code changes that came into effect last year introduced a new road hierarchy as one of the eight changes, which also included the much contested Dutch Reach that involves looking over your shoulder when getting out of your car so as to not injure any cyclists or pedestrians.
> "If you're a competent driver it shouldn't cause any issues": Cyclists react to Highway Code change outrage
The hierarchy of road users placed road users who are most at risk in the event of a collision at the top. According to the UK Government, this rule is meant to remind all road users that they have the responsibility to ensure other users remain safe.
In the hierarchy, pedestrians are placed at the top due to their lack of protection on the road making them the most vulnerable in a road traffic accident. The code rules are based on the lower a road user is in the hierarchy, the more harm they can cause others. This explains why cyclist sit second, yet bus or lorry drivers come in last place due to the size and damage the vehicle can cause.
Interestingly, pedestrians were the most likely to correctly identify the correct hierarchy of road users with nearly three quarters (73 per cent) answering correctly, followed by motorcyclists (52 per cent) and car/van Drivers (46 per cent).
> Most drivers still don't know Highway Code changes, poll shows
Still misconceptions around cycling
The study revealed that over a third of UK adults believe that the statement “cyclists should always wear light coloured or fluorescent clothing which helps other road users see you” is part of the highway code, despite it being untrue.
Additionally, a third of pedestrians incorrectly believe cyclists hold the sole responsibility to not obstruct or cause danger in routes shared by cyclists and pedestrians.
However, 40 per cent of those surveyed wrongly believe the term “cyclists have right of way over pedestrians on designated use cycle tracks” is part of the Highway Code. Surprisingly, over a third of cyclists also incorrectly thought that this was a part of the Code.
The majority of respondents also did not correctly identify that cyclists and motorcyclists should not ride on the inside of vehicles signalling or slowing down to turn left, and only a third knew that cyclists are recommended to have a bell fitted to their bike.
In January, we reported that a new poll found just 18 per cent of cyclists think road safety has improved following the new Highway Code changes, while only one in ten reckon the government takes cycle safety seriously enough.
> Highway Code changes: Just 18 percent of cyclists think road safety has improved, poll finds
Another study by carried out on behalf of Cycling UK found that after a year, most drivers were unaware of the new rules, with 72 per cent drivers unaware that they should leave at least 1.5 metres space when overtaking cyclists at speeds of up to 30mph.
Young adults and Manchester among least aware demographics
It seems that the older generation surveyed are more knowledgeable when it comes to the Highway Code, two thirds of those aged 65+ know the correct hierarchy of road users, however only one in four young adults (25-34 year-olds) answered correctly.
In terms of awareness levels around our UK cities, Manchester was the least aware
when it came to knowing the hierarchy of road users, with nearly two-thirds incorrectly selecting the order of hierarchy, with Edinburgh (62 per cent) and Belfast (60 per cent) closely following.
Southampton had the most knowledgeable residents on the hierarchy of road users, with 61 per cent picking the correct order. Cardiff was second with 60 per cent respondents giving correct answers, followed by Liverpool with over half (55 per cent) familiar with the rule.
Add new comment
38 comments
The figures are truly horrible and a graphic demonstration of the failure of the DfT to get this message across. Troubling enough perhaps, but the figures for bus and lorry drivers is just scary. How can 47% of professional drivers not know and understand the new rules? This can only be due to the utter incompetence of their employers, who have a clear duty to keep their staff informed on such matters, but have signally failed to do so.
Do we have any bus/lorry drivers here, who could tell us what steps their employer has taken to make sure that their staff understand the changes?
I am very surprised that people are surprised. If I didn't read the cycling press I would not know that the HWC had changed. Have yet to see adverts on the telly for example or as junk on FB. Rather a low profile I think.
but the point of the new rules is they are just common sense, give more vulnerable road users as much space as you can when you overtake, dont run pedestrians over when they cross the road, just dont be a complete aerosol when you drive.
That the general public in the UK no longer seem to be able to think for themselves and possess the common sense to need this stuff hammered home for them is left for another debate, but this stuff isnt actually anything any driver shouldnt have been doing in the first place under the old rules.
Deodorant please
Ball or aerosol
Neither, I want it for my armpits.
I don't know if it is half, but a significant fraction of drivers are confused by any set of rules that doesn't reflect their idea of the "natural" order. Which is that everyone slower than them should get out of their way. Everyone in front of them in a queue is causing congestion. And everyone using a smaller/cheaper vehicle than theirs is a loser while everyone in a larger/posher vehicle is a show-off.
Exactly. Is it "confused" or is it "IDGAF"?
Agree - but "change" of this type is difficult. Our current system is self-reinforcing in many ways. Trivial example - it doesn't feel safe or pleasant on the road for most people walking or cycling because of faster larger motor vehicles - so people naturally stay off the road, so drivers don't expect them to be there so don't feel the need to drive more slowly and can be irritated if they find them there etc.
In addition there are several human psychological traits driving "fitting in" or "following the crowd". So even with a new system that may be self-reinforcing it requires a significant number of people to shift behaviour for the new system to become established.
An excellent point.
As with most people on here, I am a cyclist, driver and pedestrian. None of the figures on here surprise me (not even "with four in ten cyclists believing they take priority over pedestrians")
Its a little depressing that cycling has been around so long, yet today's cyclist need to be pioneers of safety.
Pages