Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Video: Passenger gets out of car to confront cyclist for riding in primary position (includes swearing)

Would the angry passenger have hurled abuse at the driver of the Audi in front of the cyclist? We doubt it

A ​cyclist in Surrey has filmed the moment a passenger got out of a car to confront her because she was riding in primary position – however, police have said they will not be investigating the incident.

The rider, named Katherine, filmed the incident on her way home from work in Esher on the evening of Thursday 4 November.

She told road.cc: “I reported the incident to the police, who recently contacted me to let me know they would not be investigating the incident further, meaning the men in the video will not receive any communication from the police, as confirmed by the officer I spoke to.

“While I find that extremely frustrating, considering the stress and anxiety the men put me through, I would at least like to share the video so other cyclists in the Surrey area may be a bit more wary should they come across these men,” she added.

There’s one specific aspect of the video that underlines how some road users single out cyclists for abuse – namely, that even if there had been no-one on a bike on the road in question, the vehicle and its occupants would not have got through the junction any quicker, due to the Audi in front of them.

Would the passenger have got out of the car to give the driver of that vehicle a piece of his mind? Somehow we doubt it, and Katherine agreed.

“Exactly, had they succeeded in overtaking me on that road, they would still have been stuck behind the other car,” she said.

"The police officer told me the car I reported is registered in Walton on Thames, so the odds of coming across them are reasonably high, considering I have a few colleagues travelling from that area to Esher.

“However, the officer insisted the ongoing risk to me is low so they would not be speaking to these men.

“So now, these men have gone on thinking what they did is acceptable and will probably do the same or worse to another cyclist. But ‘the police don't operate under what if statements’, or so I was told.”

 

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

68 comments

Avatar
Bungle_52 | 3 years ago
18 likes

Katherine, you were completely in the right in your cycling and it's very disappointing that the police took no action. I hope this intimidation and threatening behaviour doesn't put you off.

Avatar
kbm1990 replied to Bungle_52 | 3 years ago
9 likes

Hi, Katherine here. Thank you for your kind words! I am now making sure to leave work when it's still "light" outside, if only to improve video quality.

It is very disappointing about the police; their attitudes towards the more vulnerable road users leaves a lot to be desired.

Avatar
wtjs | 3 years ago
10 likes

This case does take the shine off Surrey Police's reputation, and is rather disappointing. The lack of action would be entirely normal for Lancashire, except that they would not have responded at all and thereby would not have declared they wouldn't be taking any action. It is now well over 3 months since the nutter driver of BMW PK14 HLW close passed me then threatened to 'fucking flatten' me and to knock me off my bike- all on immaculate video. It would have continued on the usual path of no response at all if I hadn't continually harassed them after reporting the aggression online and by phone. It's 2 1/2 months since the first officer asked me to set up an appointment for providing a statement. Then it went completely silent despite my repeated reminders. Then that officer became suddenly 'not on operational duties' and the case ended up with another PC who interviewed aforementioned nutter but then claimed to have been transferred to another area, unspecified. I offered to cycle out to 'another area', within reason, but there has been no response beyond a non-specific request to 'discuss the case' at some unspecified date in the future- the enire incident is on video so there's nothing much to discuss. This has clearly been a 'go very slow' and is now probably moving to a 'there's nothing we can do' dodge. They don't like stating that in an email and prefer a meeting which can't be recorded and which they can later say was 'misunderstood'. I have written saying that 'we're not going to do anything' can be more efficiently written down if that is LC's intent. We shall see

Avatar
Bungle_52 replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
3 likes

I admire your perseverence. Good luck.

Avatar
Benthic replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
4 likes
Avatar
Surreyrider replied to wtjs | 3 years ago
2 likes

I think you must have previously fallen for Road CC's unwarranted fawning over Surrey when in fact this inaction is no surprise whatsoever to cyclists living here. 

Avatar
eburtthebike | 3 years ago
9 likes

A very threatening situation for the woman, and I'm surprised that the police have taken no action; maybe if she'd been driving a car they would have?

AAAAAAAAAGH; return of the giant full screen advertisments!indecision

Avatar
Captain Badger | 3 years ago
21 likes

No action on aggressive and physical intimidation of a lone female by 2 males.

Shame on you Surrey Police

Interesting that some forces like to threaten prosecution to lone riders who swear when they come close to death, but this action, which constitutes verbal abuse, nothing

CPS website wrote:

Public order offences

1.  These offences contrary to the Public Order Act 1986 relate to threatening, abusive or insulting words or behaviour, or display of visible representations, which:

  • Are likely to cause fear of, or to provoke, immediate violence: section 4;
  • Intentionally cause harassment, alarm or distress: section 4A; or
  • Are likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress (threatening or abusive words or behaviour only): section 5.

Avatar
Surreyrider replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
6 likes

And maybe now Road CC will stop their stupid love-in with Surrey Police and realise that they're as bad as the rest at taking action when given evidence by cyclists. 

Avatar
zero_trooper replied to Captain Badger | 3 years ago
12 likes

You're quite right, this isn't a Road Traffic matter, it's a public order offence. Lone female threatened by 2 males at night time and the police do nothing!

This is a crime and should been recorded as such and investigated.

The fact that the officer didn't think that it was unlikely to happen again has nothing to do with it. It's how the victim feels about the situation.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to zero_trooper | 3 years ago
4 likes

zero_trooper wrote:

You're quite right, this isn't a Road Traffic matter, it's a public order offence. Lone female threatened by 2 males at night time and the police do nothing!

This is a crime and should been recorded as such and investigated.

The fact that the officer didn't think that it was unlikely to happen again has nothing to do with it. It's how the victim feels about the situation.

This is indicative about how trivially many (not all) police officers see the intimidation of women. This closes off the public space to access by women. it's facking negligence.

Avatar
kbm1990 replied to zero_trooper | 3 years ago
9 likes

Hello, Lone female here. It was recorded to the best of my knowledge, just not to be continued as an investigation. The officer repeated multiple times that they have been told by their higher-ups not to investigate on "what-ifs". So basically, until these men actually injure a cyclist, they won't do anything. Which is why I wanted to share the video; if you're in the area, be extra careful of this car and these muppets.

Avatar
Mungecrundle replied to kbm1990 | 3 years ago
4 likes

I genuinely wonder if certain Police forces make a balanced judgement based on financial budget between actively pursuing road safety or training liaison Officers to break bad news to relatives waiting for someone to come home.

At the very least those guys need some words of advice and put on notice about their future behaviour.

Avatar
Captain Badger replied to kbm1990 | 3 years ago
9 likes
kbm1990 wrote:

Hello, Lone female here. It was recorded to the best of my knowledge, just not to be continued as an investigation. The officer repeated multiple times that they have been told by their higher-ups not to investigate on "what-ifs". So basically, until these men actually injure a cyclist, they won't do anything. Which is why I wanted to share the video; if you're in the area, be extra careful of this car and these muppets.

That's terrible. It wasn't a what if, it actually happened. It was intimidation and harassment, pure and simple. I'm really sorry you had to experience that

Avatar
Ride On | 3 years ago
14 likes

Hmm. I wonder what the views of Surrey Police are on violence against women, I think the gender of the cyclist is probably relevant here.

Surrey Police response is not one which will build the confidence of women in going out alone.

Avatar
GMBasix | 3 years ago
8 likes

I would imagine a tweet to Surrey RPU might get a different response (or a more fairminded reason why they can't take action in this instance). Even words of advice at this stage would be better than nothing.

Avatar
EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
14 likes

Thanks to the parked cars on the other side of the road she'd have had to cycle inches away from the kerb...in order for the car to close pass her by inches...FFS, why aren't the Police having a word here?  

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to EddyBerckx | 3 years ago
11 likes

Tbh, a bit like the some of the Vine posts, if she had cycled more to the left, the driver would have had to close pass to get by. If they couldn't get by in the two bits of non parking, they weren't getting through elsewhere. 
He also didn't seem to notice that they would have only been two yards further ahead at the spot they decided they were so much in a rush in, they had to get out and confront the cyclist and waste THEIR precious time. 

Avatar
Snakebyte | 3 years ago
3 likes

Exactly what I was thinking. The same Surrey police who put this tweet out (23 June 2021) in response to a similar incident ...

Dear Meg,
We’ve DM’d you.
Yours sincerely,
The Police x

— Roads Policing Unit (RPU) - Surrey Police - UK (@SurreyRoadCops)
 

Oh well, or perhaps it's a different Surrey police force. The mind boggles.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Snakebyte | 3 years ago
6 likes

Different Police officers and locations within Surrrey more like. 

Avatar
Surreyrider replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 3 years ago
1 like

Err, same force. 

Avatar
maviczap replied to Surreyrider | 3 years ago
7 likes
Surreyrider wrote:

Err, same force. 

Same force, different unit, doesn't mean that these events get treated the same way.

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to Surreyrider | 3 years ago
4 likes

And? The twitter guy works for one unit. The Police involveed here might work for another. Mark Hodgson (and Steve Hudson) did great work promoting submitting video evidence and talking on close passes and dangerous driving around vulnerable users. Unfortunately other people on trhe force are not as strident. Same here. 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 3 years ago
17 likes

Garage at Large wrote:

Surrey police eh? You mean the same people who sit behind a computer screen all day writing "witty" Twitter put-downs to drivers? Sounds about right.

Katherine, you were completely in the right in your cycling and it's very disappointing, but unsurprising, that Surrey police refused to do any work. I hope this intimidation and threatening behaviour doesn't put you off.

Are you the same person who left the comment below on this article https://road.cc/content/news/aggressive-driver-meltdown-after-close-pass-cyclists-286251 about a totally psychotic driver who was screaming and swearing like a banshee at cyclists and followed them into town to continue attacking them? Why, it's almost as if you're a stinking hypocrite!

 

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Lance ꜱtrongarm | 3 years ago
13 likes

Your attempts to defend your stupid comments get weaker by the day. It's sad. You really do need to seek help.

Avatar
Flintshire Boy replied to Rendel Harris | 3 years ago
1 like

Trendy Rendy.

Lost the argument, so resorts to ad homs.

Thanks, Rendy - you've certainly showed us all the extent of your reasoning powers.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Flintshire Boy | 3 years ago
6 likes

.

Avatar
Hirsute replied to Flintshire Boy | 3 years ago
10 likes

I guess now you are simply a sock puppet account or a pathetic attempt at being a wum.

Lost the argument - I would ask you to justify that but previous posting are that you post and run away. Then come back a few days later to snipe from the sidelines in another thread.

Do you have anything at all to say on the actual point of the thread?

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Hirsute | 3 years ago
5 likes

Sad isn't it - one is reminded of the kids who hang around behind the school bully pretending they're hard.

Avatar
Rendel Harris replied to Flintshire Boy | 3 years ago
5 likes

'

Pages

Latest Comments