Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Police "appalled" by sentence of driver who ran red light and killed cyclist as he inhaled laughing gas

An active travel campaigner attending the sentencing of Harry Lock, who killed mother-of-three Maria Perez-Gonzalez in Exeter last year, has hit out at the "perverse" sentence and called for Lock to be banned from driving for life...

A driver who killed a cyclist in Exeter after running a red light as he inhaled laughing gas from behind the wheel of his BMW has been sentenced to three years in prison and a driving ban that will see him disqualified for an additional two years following his release. Harry Lock admitted causing the death of Maria Perez-Gonzalez, and an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing claims police were "appalled" and the family "distraught" by the "perverse" sentence, with an appeal set to be lodged. 

Lock, 24, left an Exeter pub on the evening of 7th August 2021 to return home to Plymouth alongside a passenger in his front seat. Lock stopped his BMW 4 Series briefly to retrieve laughing gas cannisters from his boot, continuing to use it as he drove. 

Despite ignoring requests from his passenger to stop inhaling the substance, Lock continued, and drove through a red light on Western Way in Exeter. It was here that Lock hit 53-year-old Miss Perez-Gonzalez, a mother-of-three, who was attempting to cross the road on her bike. The healthcare assistant died from her injuries two days later. 

In his initial police interview, Lock claimed the traffic light had been green; however, small details from CCTV footage proved that the light was red when Lock drove over the junction, and had been for seven seconds. 

Warning: upsetting content

Miss Perez-Gonzalez's family agreed for footage of the incident (above) to be released, "in the hope it will warn other motorists of the tragic consequences of dangerous driving" according to Devon and Cornwall Police.

Sergeant Troy Bennett, of Devon and Cornwall Police’s Serious Collisions Investigation Team, commented: “Harry Lock’s dangerous actions on the evening of 7 August 2021, where he drove while using nitrous oxide and contravened a red traffic light, had catastrophic and fatal consequences.

“Those tragic consequences are felt by the family of Maria Perez-Gonzalez to this day as they continue to mourn her loss.

“As Lock starts his sentence, he can reflect on his poor choices that evening.

“Driving while impaired is one of the ‘fatal five’ most dangerous driving behaviours that often contribute to fatal or serious road traffic collisions.

“I urge all those who get behind the wheel to ensure they never drive while under the influence of alcohol or drugs and that they drive carefully.”

A statement on behalf of Miss Perez-Gonzalez's children said: “Maria Perez-Gonzalez was a loving, caring mum to Edgar, Chris and Jorge who desperately miss her.

“She was an incredible person who accomplished amazing things in life, who was going to achieve so much more. A year away from reuniting with her oldest son, Edgar, after 20 years. She was a remarkable woman that helped whoever surrounded her.

“She had been through difficult times but always stayed positive, even in the face of the extreme adversity, testament to her strength and courage. She was a health care assistant at the RD&E, just about to embark on university nursing course before she was so cruelly taken.”

Caspar Hughes, an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing, claims the family were distraught and police officers involved in the investigations were "appalled" by the sentencing, with one arguing that the crime should have been considered a Category A offence. 

Hughes added: "Currently the family and police want to appeal, if they go ahead they’ll lodge an appeal early next week. 

"With regard to the driving ban, [Lock] should be banned for life, to keep the roads safer for us all. But that isn’t possible under our current law.

"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.

"We need bench trials with specially trained judges to hear these cases."

Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story). 

Add new comment

46 comments

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to stonojnr | 5 months ago
0 likes

I've no idea, not being a lawyer, knowing the cases, what was reporting, what was given in evidence etc. Can only guess that sometimes evidence which can be challenged is introduced in the hope that either some will stick or more likely even if disputed / dismissed it will still colour perception of an individual.

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to Mr Anderson | 5 months ago
1 like

I was in a restaurant with my family a while back and there was a car parked outside. The driver and passenger were inhaling NOx and then drove off. I suppose I should've called the cops while they were still parked there. But it's a common issue. Just see how many discarded NOx cylinders there are beside roads.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to OldRidgeback | 5 months ago
2 likes

A pedant writes: If they were in an ICE car with engine on they probably were inhaling NOx. But they only need the engine cylinders for that and they probably took them with them... common parlance has (unvoiced) s not x as in "nos" if I have it right?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/NOx

(Agree though for a while I've noted these things lying about in quantity).

Avatar
OldRidgeback replied to chrisonabike | 5 months ago
1 like

Good point, I'd forgotten my chemistry and my old teacher Mr Street would've been very disappointed. N2O.

Avatar
Mr Anderson | 5 months ago
10 likes

You think this sentence is bad, it's a lot better than 20+ years ago.

I remember reading a report in Cycling Weekly about 25 years ago.  A schoolboy approx. 12 yrs old, was killed while cycling home from school.  I think this may have been in New Addington, near Croydon.

The driver was driving at 60mph on a residential 30mph road.  He was found guilty of death by careless driving.  The sentence was a 1 year ban and £500 fine.

I believe the lorry driver who killed Bruce Bursford had a similar sentence.

Avatar
john_smith replied to Mr Anderson | 5 months ago
0 likes

£500 was worth a lot more then than now.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to john_smith | 5 months ago
7 likes

About 926 quid.  And one year was a lot longer too...(that's also science.)

Avatar
john_smith replied to chrisonabike | 5 months ago
1 like

Fascinating stuff (seriously). I didn't realise Forbes had articles like that.

Avatar
Hirsute | 5 months ago
9 likes

Waiting for mark Harper to legislate on this supported by Briggs

Avatar
chrisonabike | 5 months ago
4 likes

Consuming an anesthetic gas while driving?  WTF?

I'm not well-versed in what the kids are doing these days, but as I understand it as well as being a giggle this drug is associated not just with "slower reaction times" but unconsciousness.

Seems to me a step beyond "I was so stoned I didn't notice that the lights had changed".  Although it does say his companion suggested he give it a rest.

I wonder - did the decades of anti drink-driving campaigns really succeed, or is it just that social mores have moved on to acceptability of different patterns of drug use?

Talking of - "left the pub and got into the driver's seat".  Presumably this was checked out by police?  Or maybe "has admitted to the drugs, that will do for a charge".

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to chrisonabike | 5 months ago
8 likes

Since this was a reckless idiot hitting someone trying to cross the road no doubt Mr. Briggs will be interested (sorry...)

Also we can see how the legal system sensibly adapts itself to circumstances, not just outcomes (as noted in the case of Auriol Gray - if not for the fact that the cyclist died the appeal judge couldn't imagine the charge being brought etc.).  So: doctor (implicitly) admits killing someone by not looking before driving across a junction - no chargeDriver somehow doesn't manage to kill two cyclists at a roundabout, pleads guilty - ten months.  Another driver ignores give way markings, by chance doesn't manage to kill someone, pleads guilty - twelve months....

Now - there are important differences in all those, but it does seem like there are some guidelines for "otherwise law abiding" drivers caught out by a moment of madness.  Try to be a "respectable member of society", if you're going to tell some lies stick to "I looked but honestly did not see them" or "I cannot remember".  And don't lose heart if you've got smashed or were speeding - the latter's definitely excusable and it seems the former is increasingly so.

Avatar
eburtthebike | 5 months ago
22 likes

"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias."

This, a thousand times this.

This relatively lenient sentence is far from being an aberation, and is quite in line with other penalties for similar offences, but that is just motornormativity in action: it's still obscene.

Avatar
the little onion replied to eburtthebike | 5 months ago
10 likes

plus a dose of the justice system and police being institutionally anti-cyclist

Avatar
Rome73 replied to the little onion | 5 months ago
3 likes

Is says in the article that the police were shocked by the sentence and may appeal. 

Avatar
harry3 replied to Rome73 | 2 months ago
0 likes

The police reaction to the sentence highlights concerns about its perceived leniency. While the legal system ensures fairness, their intent to appeal suggests a belief that justice may not have been fully served. An appeal could provide an opportunity to reassess the case and ensure public confidence in the outcome.

Avatar
Sevenfold replied to eburtthebike | 5 months ago
9 likes

Absolutely correct. Specially trained judges & juries(?) are needed to ensure drivers who kill or seriously injure get an appropriate punishment .

eburtthebike wrote:

"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias."

This, a thousand times this.

This relatively lenient sentence is far from being an aberation, and is quite in line with other penalties for similar offences, but that is just motornormativity in action: it's still obscene.

Pages

Latest Comments