Harry Lock - image and screenshot via Devon and Cornwall Police
Police "appalled" by sentence of driver who ran red light and killed cyclist as he inhaled laughing gas
An active travel campaigner attending the sentencing of Harry Lock, who killed mother-of-three Maria Perez-Gonzalez in Exeter last year, has hit out at the "perverse" sentence and called for Lock to be banned from driving for life...
A driver who killed a cyclist in Exeter after running a red light as he inhaled laughing gas from behind the wheel of his BMW has been sentenced to three years in prison and a driving ban that will see him disqualified for an additional two years following his release. Harry Lock admitted causing the death of Maria Perez-Gonzalez, and an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing claims police were "appalled" and the family "distraught" by the "perverse" sentence, with an appeal set to be lodged.
Lock, 24, left an Exeter pub on the evening of 7th August 2021 to return home to Plymouth alongside a passenger in his front seat. Lock stopped his BMW 4 Series briefly to retrieve laughing gas cannisters from his boot, continuing to use it as he drove.
Despite ignoring requests from his passenger to stop inhaling the substance, Lock continued, and drove through a red light on Western Way in Exeter. It was here that Lock hit 53-year-old Miss Perez-Gonzalez, a mother-of-three, who was attempting to cross the road on her bike. The healthcare assistant died from her injuries two days later.
In his initial police interview, Lock claimed the traffic light had been green; however, small details from CCTV footage proved that the light was red when Lock drove over the junction, and had been for seven seconds.
Warning: upsetting content
Miss Perez-Gonzalez's family agreed for footage of the incident (above) to be released, "in the hope it will warn other motorists of the tragic consequences of dangerous driving" according to Devon and Cornwall Police.
Sergeant Troy Bennett, of Devon and Cornwall Police’s Serious Collisions Investigation Team, commented: “Harry Lock’s dangerous actions on the evening of 7 August 2021, where he drove while using nitrous oxide and contravened a red traffic light, had catastrophic and fatal consequences.
“Those tragic consequences are felt by the family of Maria Perez-Gonzalez to this day as they continue to mourn her loss.
“As Lock starts his sentence, he can reflect on his poor choices that evening.
“Driving while impaired is one of the ‘fatal five’ most dangerous driving behaviours that often contribute to fatal or serious road traffic collisions.
“I urge all those who get behind the wheel to ensure they never drive while under the influence of alcohol or drugs and that they drive carefully.”
A statement on behalf of Miss Perez-Gonzalez's children said: “Maria Perez-Gonzalez was a loving, caring mum to Edgar, Chris and Jorge who desperately miss her.
“She was an incredible person who accomplished amazing things in life, who was going to achieve so much more. A year away from reuniting with her oldest son, Edgar, after 20 years. She was a remarkable woman that helped whoever surrounded her.
“She had been through difficult times but always stayed positive, even in the face of the extreme adversity, testament to her strength and courage. She was a health care assistant at the RD&E, just about to embark on university nursing course before she was so cruelly taken.”
Caspar Hughes, an active travel campaigner who attended the sentencing, claims the family were distraught and police officers involved in the investigations were "appalled" by the sentencing, with one arguing that the crime should have been considered a Category A offence.
Hughes added: "Currently the family and police want to appeal, if they go ahead they’ll lodge an appeal early next week.
"With regard to the driving ban, [Lock] should be banned for life, to keep the roads safer for us all. But that isn’t possible under our current law.
"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias.
"We need bench trials with specially trained judges to hear these cases."
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
A 2 year driving ban? (I assume he won't get much driving, nitrous fuelled or otherwise while in jail...) should be much, much longer. I would support lifetime bans for anyone convicted of dangerous / careless driving. There shou;d be no place on public roads for drivers like this.
Rather than pissing about with sending refugees to Rwanda we should instead be buying space in North Korean reeducation camps for this piece of s*** to spend the next ten years.
'Addressing the message to "all the dads out there" ahead of Father's Day on Sunday, the star of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares and Hell's Kitchen stressed the importance of wearing a helmet.'
Where do you see the problem? He's expressing an opinion. You're free to ignore it. He can't actually force you to make you children wear helmets if you don't want them wear to.
The article says 'his bmw' but was it? He seemed to abandon it like there was no connection to him.
ps. Anyone else noticed that this comment field can't be written into until after the save button is pressed and you get the 'comment field is required' message?
The article says 'his bmw' but was it? He seemed to abandon it like there was no connection to him.
Given the vile piece of shit he undoubtedly is I'd hazard a guess that the way he appears to be running away (in the opposite direction to Ms Perez-Gonzalez, note, didn't even go to check if she was alive or dead) might indicate that he had some idea of claiming to the police that his car had been stolen.
ps. Anyone else noticed that this comment field can't be written into until after the save button is pressed and you get the 'comment field is required' message?
Are you on a Samsung tablet by any chance? I get something similar, although I never tried hitting save - I found that clicking the format dropdown makes it writable.
ps. Anyone else noticed that this comment field can't be written into until after the save button is pressed and you get the 'comment field is required' message?
Are you on a Samsung tablet by any chance? I get something similar, although I never tried hitting save - I found that clicking the format dropdown makes it writable.
"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias."
It isn't shocking, because it's completely irrelevant.
And yet our wondeful government (and the opposition) still think it's a good idea to spend their time enacting legislation to ensure that dangerous cyclists face the full force of the law. Where's the equity?
"A LORRY driver who knocked down and killed a British inventor and world record-breaking cyclist after being distracted by his mobile phone was fined £500 by a magistrate yesterday.
The widow and relatives of Bruce Bursford, a father of two and the breaker of 10 world cycling records, gasped in court as the level of the fine was announced."
20+ years this was a very common sentence for killing someone due to careless driving.
Matthew Briggs will be a happy man, another scum cyclist off his roads. All hail Briggs, Harper Duncan-Smith, Starmer, etc., etc. The champions of killers.
Hmm... perhaps that explains why people are doing it then? I thought possession was criminalised now - so presumably if they'd not finished all the cannisters it'd be simple? (I'm sure lawyers would be able to argue about possession of used "paraphernalia"...)
Before the law change, there would be hundreds of those small silver cannisters in the road after a weekend. I often wondered what the scrap value might be?
After the law change I now see these extra large spray cans instead lying everywhere. I wonder if there is a loophole somewhere?
admittedly the case was about a crashed car, but there have been Premier league football players accused in court of inhaling laughing gas, prior to then being involved in the crash. But if the police were powerless to do anything about it, why would they have brought it up in the case ? as you wouldnt be able to prove anything about it based on simply someone saw them do it.
Add new comment
46 comments
Metro carried this story, and their version has the driver steering with his knees while inhaling the gas.
A 2 year driving ban? (I assume he won't get much driving, nitrous fuelled or otherwise while in jail...) should be much, much longer. I would support lifetime bans for anyone convicted of dangerous / careless driving. There shou;d be no place on public roads for drivers like this.
By that the judge is depressingly admiting they'll be out in under a year and a half for any sort of driving ban to kick in
immediate lifetime ban. amen to that.
Rather than pissing about with sending refugees to Rwanda we should instead be buying space in North Korean reeducation camps for this piece of s*** to spend the next ten years.
Maybe police shouldn't participate in this kind of stich-up elsewhere then...
Off topic,
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cow-surrey-police-ram-hit-vi...
Also off topic.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1002z9vne3o
'Addressing the message to "all the dads out there" ahead of Father's Day on Sunday, the star of Ramsay's Kitchen Nightmares and Hell's Kitchen stressed the importance of wearing a helmet.'
Not sure where he wears his helmet.
I did wonder about that too...
Great, another celebrity who knows nothing about road safety telling us about road safety. Stick with cooking Gordon.
What? So we shouldn't wear helmets and he wouldn't have been far worse off without it?
Where do you see the problem? He's expressing an opinion. You're free to ignore it. He can't actually force you to make you children wear helmets if you don't want them wear to.
Yikes. That looks painful. Will be interesting to see what colour it is in a week or two.
Lightly sautéed aubergine?
The article says 'his bmw' but was it? He seemed to abandon it like there was no connection to him.
ps. Anyone else noticed that this comment field can't be written into until after the save button is pressed and you get the 'comment field is required' message?
Given the vile piece of shit he undoubtedly is I'd hazard a guess that the way he appears to be running away (in the opposite direction to Ms Perez-Gonzalez, note, didn't even go to check if she was alive or dead) might indicate that he had some idea of claiming to the police that his car had been stolen.
Are you on a Samsung tablet by any chance? I get something similar, although I never tried hitting save - I found that clicking the format dropdown makes it writable.
It behaves like that on an iPad too.
"This killer driver was judged by a driver, investigated by police who are drivers, the defence lawyer was a driver, the court staff are all drivers. These perverse sentences are delivered by a system dominated by drivers, which isn’t shocking in a world drowning in driver bias."
It isn't shocking, because it's completely irrelevant.
How so? Killing someone whilst driving a car seems to be accepted to a greater degree than practically any other way of killing.
What other ways of killing were you thinking of?
with a bicycle for example
And yet our wondeful government (and the opposition) still think it's a good idea to spend their time enacting legislation to ensure that dangerous cyclists face the full force of the law. Where's the equity?
I was right!
"A LORRY driver who knocked down and killed a British inventor and world record-breaking cyclist after being distracted by his mobile phone was fined £500 by a magistrate yesterday.
The widow and relatives of Bruce Bursford, a father of two and the breaker of 10 world cycling records, gasped in court as the level of the fine was announced."
20+ years this was a very common sentence for killing someone due to careless driving.
Words fail.
Matthew Briggs will be a happy man, another scum cyclist off his roads. All hail Briggs, Harper Duncan-Smith, Starmer, etc., etc. The champions of killers.
CyclingMikey has now caught two drivers inhaling gas. This is in Central London, in broad daylight!
But mikey comments, "the Police are powerless to do anything, as the toxicity dissipates before it can be tested."
Hmm... perhaps that explains why people are doing it then? I thought possession was criminalised now - so presumably if they'd not finished all the cannisters it'd be simple? (I'm sure lawyers would be able to argue about possession of used "paraphernalia"...)
Before the law change, there would be hundreds of those small silver cannisters in the road after a weekend. I often wondered what the scrap value might be?
After the law change I now see these extra large spray cans instead lying everywhere. I wonder if there is a loophole somewhere?
admittedly the case was about a crashed car, but there have been Premier league football players accused in court of inhaling laughing gas, prior to then being involved in the crash. But if the police were powerless to do anything about it, why would they have brought it up in the case ? as you wouldnt be able to prove anything about it based on simply someone saw them do it.
Pages