‘Rolling coal’ – where a driver of a truck modifies their vehicle to enable it to emit thick clouds of black smoke (as shown in the above video) – constitutes assault, according to the District Attorney of a Texas county where on Saturday a teenage driver engaging in the practice crashed into six cyclists, two of whom needed to be airlifted to hospital.
A Special Prosecutor has been appointed to investigate Saturday’s crash near Houston, but police in Waller County have yet to make an arrest, provoking outrage among local cyclists, including some who were on the group ride, training for Ironman Texas, with several questioning whether the driver of the pick-up truck involved may be related to local law enforcement officials.
> Outrage as teen driver who hit six Texas cyclists as he deliberately blew exhaust fumes at them remains free
Writing on Facebook, Elton Mathis, the District Attorney of Waller County, said: “Your comments (even the less than flattering ones) have been instructive to this office on how prevalent the problem of ‘rolling coal’ is not only in Waller County, but across the nation.
“Rolling coal when a person is in the vicinity and when the individual rolling coal intentionally or knowingly causes that excess exhaust to contact that bystander is AT A MINIMUM an assault. They are causing their vehicle to ‘spit’ on a living, breathing, human being that is worthy of dignity and not having his or her person violated.
“That simple assault is easily elevated to a jail eligible offense if bodily injury occurs, which can be caused by entry of toxic particles into mouth, nose and eyes.
“Waller County law enforcement agencies all across the county are being reminded today of the availability of these and other charges which can be brought against individuals acting in such a criminal manner,” Mathis continued.
“The underlying investigation and gathering of evidence by Waller P.D. [Police Department] is still progressing. Thank you for your input and the positive exchanges we have seen to educate those who are ignorant of this commonplace occurrence,” he added.
Special Prosecutor Warren Diepraam, a former first assistant DA to Mathis and expert in vehicular homicide cases, has been appointed to the case, reports Click2Houston.com.
Rick DeToto, who is representing the driver, said in a statement: “The police did an investigation at the scene. This included speaking with eyewitnesses to the accident.
“After their investigation, they decided not to charge my client and did not even issue him a traffic ticket. Clearly, they determined a crime had not occurred,” he insisted.
“My client stopped immediately, called 911, attempted to render aid and co-operated with police.”
But Joe Cutrufo, Executive Director of Bike Houston, insisted that the driver needed to be held to account.
“We are afraid that if this driver gets away with it then other drivers in Waller County, or anywhere really, will be emboldened to attack, harass and threaten cyclists because they know they can get away with it,” he said.
In a statement, Charlie Thomas of Huber, Thomas, and Marcelle (Bike Law Texas) and Bike Law National’s founding attorney, Peter Wilborn, of Wilborn Law, who are jointly representing the six cyclists, said: “We hope that anyone who wants to share this horrific story with the public will be as interested at a later, more appropriate date, as they are now.
“And we hope that knowledge of this incident will change the way that people talk about bike crashes, and the impact they have on their victims’ lives. They are very different from automotive collisions. They are NOT ‘accidents’.
“Charlie, Peter, our entire Bike Law community, and I hope that increased awareness and accountability will encourage others to join us and our partnered organisations (like Bike Houston) in our fight to mitigate these kinds of events with legislative, procedural, and policy changes needed to improve safety and calm traffic for all road users, especially those who are most vulnerable.”
Waller County Police Department is continuing to investigate the case.
Add new comment
37 comments
I'm not choosing to adopt a position as you call it. That is my position.
You appear to be assenting to being a contrarian.
Is that what you intended?
Well the Lawyers representing the 6 unfortunates seem to be hinting that there might be a bit of nepotism going on so do you want to take it up with them or are they also only working from the "backroom". As they state
Anyway, for someone who knowingly drives the wrong way around roundabouts as it is easier to do, advocates that other drivers should do the same, do you drive a blue car by any chance?
Its also amazing how USA lawyers conduct so much of their cases through speculation in the media.
I believe the phrase for which you are groping is "barrackroom lawyers".
Does this need any modification? Diesels without a DPF will do this under hard acceleration. So I suppose it depends on whether "trucks" in the USA are supposed to have a DPF.
Sure does. ECU and sensor info dictates how much diesel is injected to combust. Excess fuel is detected and the injector timing altered to compensate. US pickups have had DPF since 2007. No stock truck can produce the amount of excess particulates these do.
Pages