‘Rolling coal’ – where a driver of a truck modifies their vehicle to enable it to emit thick clouds of black smoke (as shown in the above video) – constitutes assault, according to the District Attorney of a Texas county where on Saturday a teenage driver engaging in the practice crashed into six cyclists, two of whom needed to be airlifted to hospital.
A Special Prosecutor has been appointed to investigate Saturday’s crash near Houston, but police in Waller County have yet to make an arrest, provoking outrage among local cyclists, including some who were on the group ride, training for Ironman Texas, with several questioning whether the driver of the pick-up truck involved may be related to local law enforcement officials.
> Outrage as teen driver who hit six Texas cyclists as he deliberately blew exhaust fumes at them remains free
Writing on Facebook, Elton Mathis, the District Attorney of Waller County, said: “Your comments (even the less than flattering ones) have been instructive to this office on how prevalent the problem of ‘rolling coal’ is not only in Waller County, but across the nation.
“Rolling coal when a person is in the vicinity and when the individual rolling coal intentionally or knowingly causes that excess exhaust to contact that bystander is AT A MINIMUM an assault. They are causing their vehicle to ‘spit’ on a living, breathing, human being that is worthy of dignity and not having his or her person violated.
“That simple assault is easily elevated to a jail eligible offense if bodily injury occurs, which can be caused by entry of toxic particles into mouth, nose and eyes.
“Waller County law enforcement agencies all across the county are being reminded today of the availability of these and other charges which can be brought against individuals acting in such a criminal manner,” Mathis continued.
“The underlying investigation and gathering of evidence by Waller P.D. [Police Department] is still progressing. Thank you for your input and the positive exchanges we have seen to educate those who are ignorant of this commonplace occurrence,” he added.
Special Prosecutor Warren Diepraam, a former first assistant DA to Mathis and expert in vehicular homicide cases, has been appointed to the case, reports Click2Houston.com.
Rick DeToto, who is representing the driver, said in a statement: “The police did an investigation at the scene. This included speaking with eyewitnesses to the accident.
“After their investigation, they decided not to charge my client and did not even issue him a traffic ticket. Clearly, they determined a crime had not occurred,” he insisted.
“My client stopped immediately, called 911, attempted to render aid and co-operated with police.”
But Joe Cutrufo, Executive Director of Bike Houston, insisted that the driver needed to be held to account.
“We are afraid that if this driver gets away with it then other drivers in Waller County, or anywhere really, will be emboldened to attack, harass and threaten cyclists because they know they can get away with it,” he said.
In a statement, Charlie Thomas of Huber, Thomas, and Marcelle (Bike Law Texas) and Bike Law National’s founding attorney, Peter Wilborn, of Wilborn Law, who are jointly representing the six cyclists, said: “We hope that anyone who wants to share this horrific story with the public will be as interested at a later, more appropriate date, as they are now.
“And we hope that knowledge of this incident will change the way that people talk about bike crashes, and the impact they have on their victims’ lives. They are very different from automotive collisions. They are NOT ‘accidents’.
“Charlie, Peter, our entire Bike Law community, and I hope that increased awareness and accountability will encourage others to join us and our partnered organisations (like Bike Houston) in our fight to mitigate these kinds of events with legislative, procedural, and policy changes needed to improve safety and calm traffic for all road users, especially those who are most vulnerable.”
Waller County Police Department is continuing to investigate the case.
Add new comment
37 comments
Good news everyone!
https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/teen-driver-waller-county-texas-cyclists-hit_n_618a0675e4b055e47d7f1ea3
I'm suspicious that it's a juvenile court, but maybe the U.S. allows juveniles to drive.
In Texas they can get a learner licence at age 15, and a provisional licence at age 16.
Your quoted text states he is 16.
There's an update on this story: https://jalopnik.com/district-attorney-accuses-waller-police-of-mishandling-1847846381
Also
Here is a major (and very detailed) update from the Bike Law attorneys who are representing the victims.
https://www.bikelaw.com/2021/10/waller-bike-crash/
Thanks for that link. The first impression that I got from reading that is that some states really hate cyclists and practically encourage victim blaming.
It's very concerning that civil action seems to be the only way that the cyclists are going to see anything even approaching justice.
Thanks- that US lawyer link is very interesting- it also tells you the 4 US states to avoid when cycling (as well as Texas). Fortunately, you probably don't want to cycle in any of them
.
In 2012, without the benefit of the above link referencing the '4 States' that are best avoided, I cycled from Montreal to Miami with a friend and we went through 3 of those 4- Maryland, Virginia & North Carolina. I would definitely give them a miss in future if I were thinking of doing anything similar.
A political/ideological motivated assault on members of the public that don't share your views would be described as terrorism in other circumstances.
It's only terrorism if your skin is brown (at least in the U.S. - may apply elsewhere too)
That's not the definition of terrorism. It's just being an arsehole.
"Terrorism is the use or threat of action, both in and outside of the UK, designed to influence any international government organisation or to intimidate the public. It must also be for the purpose of advancing a political, religious, racial or ideological cause."
https://www.cps.gov.uk/crime-info/terrorism
Being an arsehole because you believe some nonsense political bullshit isn't terrorism. Acting as an arsehole with said beliefs _in an attempt to get society/laws to change_ is terrorism.
This isn't terrorism. In England&Wales, it'd certainly be aggravated assault, among other things. But claiming it's terrorism makes you look rather hyperbolic at best.
(Also, AFAIK, the US doesn't have a lot of laws regarding domestic (as opposed to international) terrorism. So the legal situation is even more complex.)
In fact the dictionary difintion is
the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims
Political aim - cyclists should not be on the roads
Means of achieving this - intimidate any cyclists found on the roads, with close passes, threat of injury and clouds of smoke. And actual injury in this case too.
When the driver is able to pass the cyclists directly, he is clearly not venting his frustrations about this encounter, so what is he doing other than trying to intimidate cyclists to stop using roads at all?
Go out with a knife and threaten/injure random members of the public? - terrorist
Got out with a truck and threaten/injury random members of the public? - just a driver
The driver now says he was reaching for his phone, which is illegal, but still no mention of him being arrested.
https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/transportation/artic...
a defence more likely to be credible, if he hadn't been "rolling coal" which isn't something that just happens randomly while driving along
I blame the parents...
According to one of the cyclists, the police were detaining the driver until his parents turned up, then they let him go. You don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to work out that something very dodgy is going on.
"Hey, Bob - what's he done this time?"
"The usual..."
"Oh, OK; thanks for bringing him home, see you at the lodge on Saturday?"
You have a real freemason issue dont you. There are about 2 million freemason in the USA so the odds on an accident involving a freemasons son being attended by a freemason police officer are a bit remote . BTW I'm not a freemason.
More likely would be some sort of political clout.
While somewhere around 8million americans will be freemasons or close relatives of freemasons. out of a popultion of 330m, so around 2.5%
I think maybe you need to look up synecdoche.
Where did I say Freemasons?
A lodge is also used in hunting; and in Texas, let's face it, way more likely reference is to hunting.
Are you particularly sensitive about freemasonry, for some reason?
There are also Elks lodges, Knights of Pythias lodges and many other fraternal organisations in the US whose members pledge to help each other when in difficulty.
Which ones are the guy that drive little cars while wearing fezzes?
That's the Shriners, I believe - so memorably and brilliantly satirised by Laurel and Hardy in Sons of the Desert.
No just lost in admiration at the endless speculation on legal process and corruption here in backroom lawyers corner. Sorry roadcc.
Well we know that driving the wrong way around a roundabout is not legal. Don;t need to be a backroom lawyer to find that out.
That's funny because you are quite happy to make comments on the legality of stuff if it suits.
The idea that understanding the law is binary is just something you push. Many laws are self contained and since we are supposed to know the highway code with its statutory links, does that mean we all have to lawyers to pass a driving test ?
I thnk you'll find that i dont routinely imply "something dodgy is going on " or "the police are lazy" etc But knock yourself out with that stuff if it floats your boat.
Another irrelevant reply.
You guys are all very similar in outlook. Are you part of a group . Freemasons ?
Not really nic. I hope you wouldn't lazily stereotype people into some group you constructed. When I have I ever made a comment about freemasons? I have criticised essex police for their lack of interest in close passes which is at odds with their supposedly safer roads policy.
I should have thought being a contrarian it was fairly easy to predict the responses and counter responses, so you shouldn't be surprised at the replies you get. They are consistent with the postion you choose to adopt.
Pages