At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
My bad, you are right. For me my point in general still stands, when it come to how reviewers and brands often talk about bikes, parts and gear.
I'm not sure the UCI worlds are on the protected sports list, as surely CX & MTB would be shown too, the Beeb probably just acquire it as part...
Re-deployed on Twitter duty?
Last clip especially for wtjs !! https://youtu.be/XKD4kI1yDMg?si=5qCj5QI72pVCR4WN
And had he not shouted 'go back to Africa', the Police would have dismissed this.
Maybe... I was taking a slightly wider interpretation, just *bringing* Nazis and Hitler into an argument
Ear, ear!
There's a lot about, and once you're "woke" or sensitised to it it's hard not to see it. However I think it's essentially a category difference if...
Good point. Although are they organised? Also fruitcakes have something to be said for them, even if they're a bit nutty.
Great film, that.