At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
>THIS< is the primary reason for 99%+ for a camera!!!!!
At what point will politicians realise that no amount of effort can really protect vulnerable users on roads and that to keep people safe automatic...
You need to "guess" the corresponding post code as well. A bit of internet sleuthing should give you options.
Doubtless, which is why I avoid the eastern parts of Kingswood.
False advertising, if you ask me. That post didn't give way when it was hit!
So many cammers in that vid making situations worse or committing offences themselves.
"teams and riders who use the machines claim it is simply for measuring performance, not enhancing it."...
Haha... edited my comment with s/car/car driver/
I note that the "reuse" is definitely as "downgraded material". The recycling - may be interesting but we'll have to see. For example just how...
Agreed - have eventually moved away from Marathon Plus for all the reasons you mention. It's a balance - the Marathon Plus tyres were the only...