At road.cc every product is thoroughly tested for as long as it takes to get a proper insight into how well it works.
Our reviewers are experienced cyclists that we trust to be objective. While we strive to ensure that opinions expressed
are backed up by facts, reviews are by their nature an informed opinion, not a definitive verdict. We don't intentionally
try to break anything (except locks) but we do try to look for weak points in any design. The overall score is not just
an average of the other scores: it reflects both a product's function and value – with value determined by how a product
compares with items of similar spec, quality, and price.
What the road.cc scores mean
Good scores are more common than bad, because fortunately good products are more common than bad.
- Exceptional
- Excellent
- Very Good
- Good
- Quite good
- Average
- Not so good
- Poor
- Bad
- Appalling
"Splendid fellows, brave heroes, risking their no-claims bonus for Blighty!"
What a lovely idea, but based on very personal experience the local filth will have far more sympathy for the offender than any victim. ...
Thanks - much appreciated. ...
Telegraph poles? not sure thats their primary use these days ?
my current best bike is a now distinctly long in the tooth hi-mod synapse from 2017, but just had no interest in the more recent ones, as there is...
The non-road-tax-paying cyclist came out of nowhere. Would have been more visible with numberplates.
As well as the tiresome situation of reliable servants being all but impossible to find these days. Reminds me of the statement by the barrister in...
"Athletes will do dumb things to improve performance, that's a given. So it's the organizer of the sport who can slow them down, by simply making...
My dealer even said we could ask for different crank length and chainring sizes if we wanted, so we did. Spanking new Ultegra cranks and rings for...
Thanks....