There is, unbelievably, a subject more contentious in cycling circles than that of wearing a helmet... and ironically, for all of its friendly intentions, is the one most likely to lead to fisticuffs.
It is the simple act of waving.
Some people get very very angry about waving. Or to be more precise, not waving, and even more specifically, not being waved back at.
The post-ride grumbling chatter, be that in the virtual world or in real life, is full of stories from people incensed upon returning home from a bike ride where someone else on a bike they didn’t know dared not return their cheery wave. Then, they have to let anyone that’s sat still for long enough know how much this has completely ruined their life. Maybe these days you can rant straight into your Wahoo and it instantly uploads your ire to your social echo chamber of choice whilst on the move. I’m not so up to speed on modern tech so who knows? Can you buy a Boohoo?
Let’s get this out the way early: I’m not a waver (feel free to comment with your thoughts on this very pressing matter below). I do, however, favour an understated and possibly barely imperceptible to some nod of the head, or a subtle yet casual raising of the fingers of the right hand; just unfurling enough away from the bars to register and be acknowledged if you know what to look for. The cycling version of the country wave if you will.
That’s enough for me. A brief in passing register and appreciation that someone else is out on their bike is all that I need to broadcast. Most often it is returned in mutually muted kind, and that’s fine, yet if someone doesn’t notice or doesn’t reciprocate in whichever way then that’s fine as well. If my low-key gesture is greeted with an over exuberant wave in reply, it does feel a little excessive in the circumstances even if I do recognise it as a polite courtesy. Maybe they’re an excitable children’s TV presenter out on a bike? I’ve seen pictures.
I have been very ostentatiously waved at, most certainly performed to make a point, and it looked a little… odd. Well, strange enough for me to realise that they were making a point, and as soon as they got home were going to tell everyone that they’d waved at a roadie who - true to stereotype - hadn’t waved back because "They’re all grumpy and up their own arses and too obsessed with chasing a Strava segment, aren’t they?"
I would have raised my hand and smiled back at them, but it took a while to work out if I knew them or not. From the OTT waving they appeared to be a very close friend who I hadn’t seen for years, and then it was too late. Sorry to whoever that was (I don’t do Strava by the way.)
I have been accused several times over the years by various people of not waving back to them, which is interesting because in each instance I’ve never been able to recall being waved at by them. I’ll happy put my hand up (not waving) and say I didn’t notice. I might have had my attention on the road or something, or not just staring at the person on a bike coming the other way to check to see if I might recognise them, or if they might be attempting contact across the tarmac.
Upon further investigations as to where and when this heinous social transgression occurred, it has emerged that actually, it might not have been me at all. I’ve had enough people mistakenly see me out on the bike when I’ve been sat at home, because there are a lot of cyclists that look the same at blurry speed under a helmet and behind glasses. I recently did a proper wave and a "hiya" at a rider coming the other way who I recognised without a shadow of a doubt, and amusingly it was one of the people who have accused me of not returning their greeting in the past.... they totally ignored me. True to the non-waving back type, they did look grumpy. I’m going to wait for maximum irony and comedy points before I raise this with them.
Save your big waves for those special, ecclesiastical occasions (image: Sterling Lorence)
But... this isn’t necessarily about the etiquette and politics of waving or the waving back, andI entirely understand the reasoning behind The Wave and its good intentions. Cycling needs to become more welcoming and inclusive and break away from its historically cliquey and exclusive history. It's nice to recognise and encourage each other on the road, yadayadayada, but trying to insist upon both The Wave and The Return as a compulsory action between cyclists is peppered with problems.
One of the things that interests me most is: when is The Waving supposed to start? If you live in a large urban area or have a daily cycle commute then waving at all other cyclists on the road is going to be impractical, dangerous and just a bit bloody weird.
It’s a recipe for at least a few awkward looks, and maybe something more hostile if you wave at every single person on a bike who is pedalling the other way. I suspect that even the most evangelical proponents of The Waving keep their smiles and eager hands down when a yoof in a hoodie dragging on a fag is expertly piloting a full-suspension mountain bike-shaped object into their salutation radar.
You probably wouldn't wave at them, so there’s clearly some sort of discrimination as to when it’s considered polite and which cyclists are probably ok to wave at. If it’s not a blanket rule, what are the parameters? Do you wave at Proper Cyclists but not People Who Just Happen To Be On A Bike, and how do you make that nuanced distinction as to whom is deserving of your genial gesticulation?
If we consider the day-to-day practicalities of waving, and it being unrealistic in a busy town as you’re just going to get worn out and maybe punched on a busy bike lane, then when does it become acceptable to start finger fwapping at other cyclists? Is it just something that you save for - what we shall call for sake of argument and brevity - A Proper Ride? Is it a buildings-per-square-mile thing or a vague cyclists-per- mile measurement? Is it only allowed when streets become roads, houses turn into hedges or when the streetlights stop? Does it start at the point you might acknowledge other people when you’re walking? Unless of course habitual bike wavers like to high-five everyone when they’re wandering around the shops.
For me, the muted recognition towards other people pedalling starts at the traffic lights where suburbia finally and suddenly gives way to country lanes. In the other direction, it’s when the meandering back streets finally reach the road that strikes up towards the top of the first hill. Within those imagined boundaries, there’s too much going on to bother with any pedalling platitudes. There might be a glance and a nod if I’m in Proper Cycling Kit and I see someone else in Proper Cycling Kit spinning through town, but that’s it. Ahhh, the joys and complications of a thousand personal protocols and minutiae of considerations and civilities that don’t really matter, and yet somehow do.
I think the biggest stumbling block with the well meaning compulsion of The Waving and of The Waving Back is the assumption that everyone who rides a bike is part of one huge friendly two-wheeled society, which is in reality a delusional fantasy. While I have met some of the most wonderful people on bikes and they can be machines for great camaraderie and community, there have been other members of the bicycle tribe I’ve met who I have felt less amenable towards. Let’s say our only common denominator is our fondess for the bicycle, and I’m absolutely certain other people on bikes that I’ve shared miles with have felt the same about me.
The bike could be substituted by a favourite band, the car you drive, wearing the same trainers or any other spurious connection. Beyond that one common denominator there doesn’t have to be anything else. Just because we both ride a bike, it doesn’t mean we’re friends. If you want examples of how riding a bike doesn’t necessarily lead to instant yet lifelong shared emotional bonds, then just poke around any raggletaggle group or more organised club of cyclists and you’ll soon uncover little dislikes and animosities between the riders. Browse the internet and while you’ll find lots of people helping each other out with bike-related problems, you’ll also see that it doesn’t take long for an argument to develop. People are people and they love to find division, and then divisions within that.
There's also the tribal conflicts that can breed between different cycling disciplines, most famously between mountain and road biking, which can become neanderthal at times (I’m excluding triathletes here because no one likes them), and which can go beyond ignoring a wave into tangible disdain and quietly bubbling hatred.
Whilst some might like to fancy that there’s a common bond between anyone on two wheels, it is just a bike and nothing more. The reasons to be on one are as varied as the people on them, and we all ride bikes for a vast array of intentions. It could just be a necessary method to get to work, or the shops, or enjoying the countryside, or training for something, or a place to revel in the quiet and get away from people; and while there might be useful and beneficial moments of commonality in the group ride or like-minded ride partners, this is in no way a constant. While I’ll always stop and ask if someone stuck by the side of the road with a stricken bike needs help, I also recognise that this doesn’t mean we’re all part of some utopian brotherhood. I mean, they might have put their broken bike upside down...
To those that vehemently insist on The Wave and The Wave Back, there is an undercurrent of gatekeeping and despite its friendly intentions, it has a slight whiff of being one of cycling’s 'Rules'. While its objectives are are good and there’s an understood level of politeness, not everyone is going to realise they’re supposed to be part of a vast wheeled clan. They’re just riding a bike, and the indignation which some people feel towards some other random hapless cyclist that they don’t know who doesn’t adhere to their little cheery protocol comes across as a little needy.
Something else that has me pondering about the whole Waving thing and belief that everyone pedalling around is part of some wider cycling community is that in doing this, then we have to accept any of the “All of you lot, you cyclists…” accusations that are angrily thrown at us by other forms of transport users whenever they see any kind of bicycle based transgression, lumping us all together as one happy rule breaking family, is reinforced. This is the bit where cyclists start waving their arms about (there’s a theme here) and bleating that them as a group are not responsible for the actions of a single rider, and we’re all independent beings so shouldn’t be blamed as a nebulous homogeneous community. We need to decide if cyclists are a diffused yet united peloton, or an unrelated multitude of fierce individuals with no group accountability. Ooooh, it’s tricky.
If it makes you happy wave all you like, but if someone doesn’t wave back, it’s okay. It is, let’s be honest, none of your business. Despite your best aspirations in wanting cycling to be a freewheeling utopia, it’s an activity far far more than what you think it is or should be. If you do have a moan about it when your ride is over, then rest assured that the affirmation from your peer bubble that you were in the right and whoever it was is just plain rude and is a typical miserable stuck-up roadie yadayadayada, will do more to inflate your self-esteem and dopamine levels than any rider simply waving back at you ever could do. Take comfort in that. Maybe they didn’t notice, maybe they had things going on their head that they were dwelling on instead of looking at you. Maybe they were concentrating on avoiding a pothole, maybe they were thinking about the tea and toast at the end of their ride, maybe they don’t know you and prefer not to wave at strangers. Maybe they don’t understand this Rule Of Cycling. Maybe lots of things. Maybe respect their space. Maybe they didn’t know they were going to ruin your day, and they still don’t know they did.
Wave if you like, wave all you like, wave as if you’ve just seen a sportive photographer hiding in the bushes. Just give a nod, or a barely recognisable 7º raise of the hand off the bars if you like. But remember that if someone is riding a bike the other way, that’s all they’re doing and that should be enough. Feel free to continue berating them for their choice of head covering though...
Add new comment
74 comments
I just say hello...or morning/afternoon...no waving
I look at the other rider. If we make eye contact, I usually nod and so does the other rider. If they wave, I'll probably wave back.
When on the road, I'm very conscious that everyone out on a bike is risking their life to do their hobby / get to work etc and it may be the only positive interaction they have on the whole journey, so a little nod and a small lift of the hand off the handbars to acknowledge them is quite important to me (I'll caveat that I don't live in a cycling metropolis so maybe see 10-15 riders each way if I'm commuting).
When on gravel or off-road, things are a lot more chilled so will say hello to every rider
This is a tricky subject. I never thought about commenting on this before reading this piece. But it is a real bind sometimes!
Some riders have a routine and always signal hello. Others don't and display fu£k off accross their faces..
So, I always nod to everyone. Whether they like it or not.
I do this because some riders go out of their way to say hello. You don't want to offend them. We share a bond. A bond set in danger. The motorist.
Again. If I ever saw a cyclist in distress I'd go out of my way to help. This is the way!
I've never waved at or acknowledged another cyclist while out riding, and neither have any done the same to me. I've not even seen others do it.
Yes, I wave and give the thumbs up but I just don't understand how you can write such a bloody essay on the subject! if a fellow rider acknowledges you great, if not its not the end of the world - they may be having a bad day.
I'm pretty relaxed about waving - maybe my lift of a finger or slight head nod wasnt noticed or their reply too subtle.
But what really gets my goat is when I overtake a rider and they blank my 'good morning'. That's just rude.
OK. This is a topic all on its own. Do you reciprocate a friendly greeting when you're the one being overtaken?
Passing a cyclist in the opposite direction warrants at least a nod or a gentle lift of the hand from the bars. But what about overtaking a fellow yet unknown cyclist? I always feel slightly awkward that a wave while passing can come across as smug, while no acknowledgement at all could be seen as something worse. I have a sense of embarrassment even when just passing by maintaining my own (usually modest) pace. What's the form, people?
How is it possible to write such an incredibly long article on the subject of a wave? - get a grip for Christ sake!
Well do you wave or don't you?
Not waving but gripping, sounds like.
I'm an off-road drop-bar rider, none of this applies to me! 😁
Hey. We're in this together! Whatever the terrain.
I nod wave or do what ever appropriate at other cyclists, most do likewise some don't, if they don't it's not a worry, do what feels ok to you and accept others right to do what they want, there are lots of things in 2023 Britain to worry about, this isn't one of them.
I just give everyone the "wanker" gesticulation, whether deserved, or not.
Problem solved.
I hope it's good for business? Rhetorical question, I don't care to know.
I tend to nod or wave at another cyclist, but I always make a point of giving a wave to thank drivers who have taken the effort to hold back for a while, or make a special effort when overtaking. It's not so much for that driver - they're supposed to give me room and act safely around me, and it's only an off chance they'll be looking in that mirror when I wave anyway. I wave to them with the intention of the car behind me seeing it, so they can see what a good overtake looks like and that I appreciate it.
I agree. A thumbs up. Acknowledging good motoring practice is a wise move and a token of your appreciation. It can only assist in better road harmony.
When I pass cyclists in my car I'll always wave when overtaking. Bizarre!
Honestly, the only two times I've knowingly and regularly waved at people are on my commute, on the same stretch of greenway. One is to an elderly man who power walks down the route at the exact same time and has done so for the two years I've ridden that route. He has almost definitely been doing so for a long while before me, too. This is kind of a wave of 'yay, well done you!'
The other is to a small brigade - and this is the most suitable word - of dog walkers who I also see every single morning. They will occupy the whole width of the path and, without fail, peel apart when I am less than 2-3m away and give me just enough room to get through. I used to get quite cross with them, but now we wave at each other as if to acknowledge this deadly game of cat-and-mouse (or would that be bike and dog?) that we unwillingly participate in every morning.
I wave at drivers who show courtesy to me. If they're at a side street and don't shoot out nearly killing me, then they get a wave. Or just obeying the law when they could save 1/2 second by killing me. That gets a wave. I've seen other cyclists in my area doing it too. This is worthwhile waving because it rewards good driving and may save lives and change attitudes. You wouldn't squash a cockroach if he always waved and said hello to you.
Totally agree with you. If a driver sits behind me for a long time because it's not safe to pass or a look over my shoulder is enough to make a driver slow and give me space to change lanes they always get a wave of thanks. The dangerous close passers get a different hand gesture.
Amusingly I once gave a cheery 'look I'm right here' wave to a driver who pulled out on me and this was met with three different obscene hand gestures in return.
https://upride.cc/incident/suv-pulls-out-on-me-then-gives-obscene-gestur...
I don't out of principle (I also don't thank drivers who stop for pedestrians at zebra crossings). They are literally obeying the law, something I would expect of them, not doing me a niceity. I always feel that thanking folks like this feels more grovelling and unctuous than anything else - but maybe that's the point?
I suppose you also wouldn't squash the cockroach who thanks you for 'saving' their life by not squashing them.
I thank drivers who stop for me at zebras and at pelicans, as well as those who drive well around me when I'm on the bike, because why not? Just because they're doing what's expected or they're obliged to do, thanks costs me nothing and hopefully makes them feel good about their behaviour and increases the chance that they will behave well next time too. I don't refuse to thank the waiter who brings my food or the doctor who gives me treatment just because they're obliged to as part of their job.
With specific reference to stopping at zebra crossings, it's not the law (though many think it is, including me until not long ago) that drivers have to stop for waiting pedestrians: they are only obliged to stop for those who are actually on the crossing. The law should mandate that they have to stop for those waiting, but it doesn't.
I guess you're right - I'm just being grouchy!
That's enlightening to hear about the law though, as I do get quite cross at drivers not pausing at zebra crossings. Picture me as Ricky Gervais in After Life, disturbing though that image is.
Oh I still get cross with them and will let them know it - it may not be breaking the law but it's just damned bad manners! I have yet to find myself in that situation with a small pot plant to hand, if I did I certainly would be tempted to emulate Gervais...
You're right. Giving way to wating pedestrians is only a should :
"195
Zebra and parallel crossings. As you approach a zebra crossing
look out for pedestrians waiting to cross and be ready to slow down or stop to let them cross
you should give way to pedestrians waiting to cross
you MUST give way when a pedestrian has moved onto a crossing"
Thanks for pointing that out. Howevever drivers should still stop.
Of course they should - if I can do it they can, I have to spend a lot more energy getting moving again. High time that should was made a must. In some areas in Canada, as I understand it, cars have to stop for any pedestrian signalling their intention to cross, even if there's no zebra, sounds great.
Drivers are like children; and similarly positive reinforcement when they do what they should, rather than just punishment when they don't, is the right thing to do.
I teach children - maybe I've just come to expect that, as adults, they'd have grown out of this need!
Pages