Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Purist Tour de France 2013

Just tried to sit down and pick a Purist team for the TdF and it's hard!

Lots of high value riders, very few very cheap riders and not many bargains to be had, this is going to be a tough race to get right from a fantasy point of view.

My thinking at the minute is Froome plus 1 high value rider (Sagan/Cavendish or maybe Contador/Voeckler) then some mid and low priced riders but there's not much quality lower down, might have to rethink and go for lots of mid-range guys...

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

101 comments

Avatar
TERatcliffe26 | 11 years ago
0 likes

The good thing about coppel loosing time is that they have to ride for Navarro in GC, who I think will top 15, and have some decent stage results

Avatar
thefatcyclist | 11 years ago
0 likes

interesting, all the leader in the purist league have pick 5 fast men and padded out wilt low cost. They will pay in the mountains, but do you think this is a viable strategy, rather than say picking 2pc, 1 gc, 2 km, etc etc, intrigued an time will tell

Avatar
letsgoup | 11 years ago
0 likes

I went all GC and climbers. I feel the only mistake was not picking Sagen. I think the out and out sprinters will ultimately score less. The test will be at the end of the Tour when we find out who scored more. Froome or Sagen  39

Avatar
paulfrank | 11 years ago
0 likes

It's NOT going too well when my Lampre DS's are scoring way more points then my star rider (Froome; I don't think Sky will be repeating last year's success.

Avatar
ray silvester | 11 years ago
0 likes

I think Froome has probably got more points than expected at this point.....his tour starts today.

If your 'Lampre DS' is Serpa then I expect him to go well today.

Avatar
Gkam84 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Just because no-one replied yesterday, doesn't mean you just edit it to bump it back up the list.

I understand you may have had a word in your ear? Please listen to it  3

Avatar
Low Speed Wobble | 11 years ago
0 likes
Avatar
Stumps replied to chrisdstripes | 11 years ago
0 likes
chrisdstripes wrote:

Happy to reveal my existing team as a) I might still change it and b) its not like its going to give anyone any ideas they hadn't already thought of - probably only one or two unpopular picks. Panicked about having no GC guys and changed it at the last minute - trying to defend top ten in overall purist...

Sagan
Froome
Talansky
Kittel
Garcia
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
El Fares
Palacios

Feel free to critique!

I started off with Sagan and Cav in my team - got neither now  39

Kittel is a surprise he normally bottles it and packs in unless i'm thinking of someone else. Good team though, you should do well.

Avatar
dave atkinson replied to chrisdstripes | 11 years ago
0 likes
chrisdstripes wrote:

Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don't know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho' - might just about be worth it...

kittel's lead man for the flat stages and degenkolb first choice for the lumpier ones, according to the team. certainly the odds for the first stage suggest it's kittel going for the win.

Avatar
drheaton replied to CarbonBreaker | 11 years ago
0 likes
CarbonBreaker wrote:

OK, I'm new to the Purist Leagues, so don't laugh at the choices, (I just don't have time to transfer each day at the moment).

Sagan
Cav
Dan Martin
Rogers
Schleck
Noval
Le Mevel
Mederel
Fischer

Sagan and Cav for the first couple of weeks, plus some beakaways from the French, Rogers and Martin for the TTT (Garmin), and Rogers ITT. Taking a punt on Schleck as I can see the peleton letting him go for a stage win to bring him out of the doldrums, and he is showing a little better form.

If I'm going to modify this, it'll only be to bring in Contador, and or Talansky, at the expense of Cav, and anther rider. I can see Bertie beating Froome.

Thoughts?

Looks like a solid team, Sagan and Cav are a good base but leave you short of credits so you've got a few cheap guys. I think that Rogers is an interesting pick, he may score but if Contador is in form he might be reduced to riding back up. Martin is another interesting one, I like him and was tempted to pick him but he's still a little unproven. Last year Martin was reduced to chasing breaks because he dropped out of contention early but he looks in better form this year and some have said he may chase the mountains jersey (although I think he's said he's aiming for top 10 overall).

All in all, a good looking team but to do well you're relying heavily on Rogers and Martin stepping up because a few people will have a Sagan/Cav combo so those points are kind of neutralised.

Avatar
backflipbedlem replied to drheaton | 11 years ago
0 likes
drheaton wrote:

I don't want to give tips really but you always have the option of dropping both Martin and Rogers and picking up Contador/Voeckler/Rolland/Pinot plus one cheaper guy.

Gadret and Coppel are decent shouts at under 9 credits and riders like Bonnet (5.2) and Hoogerland (6.2) can pick up a few points. My worry with Rogers/Martin is that both will top 10 in the GC but not actually score many fantasy points on their way there finishing 15-20th each day and picking up minor points but being consistently average.

Yea thats the problem with a lot of the GC guys

Avatar
drheaton replied to STEVESPRO 79 | 11 years ago
0 likes
STEVESPRO 79 wrote:

Well I picked my Purist team with my heart and not my head...Basically if I don't like the rider as a personality then I did not consider them....After two stages, I have zero points....

Sad thing is, I am still looking at my team and thinking that it looks pretty good....

T.VOECKLAR
RUI COSTA
J.COPPEL
R.NAVARDAUSKAS
L.WESTRE
D.NAVARRO
J.HOOGERLAND
L-P.NORDHAUG
E.GASPAROTTO

You can never tell how a purist team might do, looking at your team you could do appallingly or you could end up with a five way battle (Voeckler, Costa, Coppel, Westra, Hoogerland) for the KoM jersey and thrash everyone by a country mile.

Avatar
TERatcliffe26 replied to zedand3 | 11 years ago
0 likes
zedand3 wrote:

Can anyone tell me how I've accrued points for Nacer Bouhanni (8 so far) he's finished well down the field both days.  39

From the intermediate sprints

Avatar
chrisdstripes replied to paulfrank | 11 years ago
0 likes
paulfrank wrote:

Sky and Froome better start pulling their collective fingers out or my team will be going down big style, some nice early points from my DS but the big boys are very disappointing so far.

Yes - hopefully they'll manage to cope without a fully fit G in the TTT...

Avatar
chrisdstripes replied to thefatcyclist | 11 years ago
0 likes
thefatcyclist wrote:

interesting, all the leader in the purist league have pick 5 fast men and padded out wilt low cost. They will pay in the mountains, but do you think this is a viable strategy, rather than say picking 2pc, 1 gc, 2 km, etc etc, intrigued an time will tell

That was my plan initially - due to the high intermediate sprint points the sprinters can score on virtually every stage- but I panicked and brought in Froome and Talansky at the last minute. Will be interested to see if Cav/Kristoff will turn out to have been a better choice...

Avatar
Alan Tullett replied to ray silvester | 11 years ago
0 likes
ray silvester wrote:

I think Froome has probably got more points than expected at this point.....his tour starts today.

If your 'Lampre DS' is Serpa then I expect him to go well today.

Well, I hope so as he's in my standard team but not my purist. Done ok with Sagan so far. Now Froome, Porte and Quintana have their chance.

Avatar
arsene replied to arsene | 11 years ago
0 likes
arsene wrote:

Sagan
Quintana
Hesjedal
Navarro
Vichot
Cimolai
Schleck
Gadret
Le Mevel

I always prefer a balanced team. Not having Froome is a risk though.

As it turned out an unbalanced team seems to be the better choice. As I play with 2 purist teams I also made an unbalanced team which I'm quite content with now:
Froome
Sagan
Quintana
Vichot
Cimolai
Gadret
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
Gutierrez

Avatar
enrique replied to Low Speed Wobble | 11 years ago
0 likes
Low Speed Wobble wrote:

Pot. Kettle. Black.

'  3 '

Thanks!  1

Avatar
ray silvester replied to Stumps | 11 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:
chrisdstripes wrote:

Happy to reveal my existing team as a) I might still change it and b) its not like its going to give anyone any ideas they hadn't already thought of - probably only one or two unpopular picks. Panicked about having no GC guys and changed it at the last minute - trying to defend top ten in overall purist...

Sagan
Froome
Talansky
Kittel
Garcia
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
El Fares
Palacios

Feel free to critique!

I started off with Sagan and Cav in my team - got neither now  39

Kittel is a surprise he normally bottles it and packs in unless i'm thinking of someone else. Good team though, you should do well.

That's the impression I always have with Kittel.....flaky but fast when in the mood.....more of a stage 1 rider for standard team's

My purists are shaping ip like this:

Cavendish
Sagan
Dennis
Jeannesson
Hoogerland
LeMevel
Cunego
Gadret
Schleck

I think not having Quintana is probably my main headache.

Avatar
CarbonBreaker replied to drheaton | 11 years ago
0 likes

Would love to drop Rogers for Porte, bring in Bertie, but it just does not work, damn budgets!

Avatar
ray silvester replied to ray silvester | 11 years ago
0 likes
ray silvester wrote:
stumps wrote:
chrisdstripes wrote:

Happy to reveal my existing team as a) I might still change it and b) its not like its going to give anyone any ideas they hadn't already thought of - probably only one or two unpopular picks. Panicked about having no GC guys and changed it at the last minute - trying to defend top ten in overall purist...

Sagan
Froome
Talansky
Kittel
Garcia
Hoogerland
Le Mevel
El Fares
Palacios

Feel free to critique!

I started off with Sagan and Cav in my team - got neither now  39

Kittel is a surprise he normally bottles it and packs in unless i'm thinking of someone else. Good team though, you should do well.

That's the impression I always have with Kittel.....flaky but fast when in the mood.....more of a stage 1 rider for standard team's

My purists are shaping ip like this:

Cavendish
Sagan
Dennis
Jeannesson
Hoogerland
LeMevel
Cunego
Gadret
Schleck

I think not having Quintana is probably my main headache.

LAST MINUTE CHANGE

Out:LeMevel/Jeannesson
In:Navarro/Bonnet

Avatar
Stumps replied to chrisdstripes | 11 years ago
0 likes
chrisdstripes wrote:

Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don't know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho' - might just about be worth it...

It might muck your team up a bit but i've gone for Bennati. He is 18.6 credits and in my opinion a better sprinter than Kittel. Just a thought for you to ponder  3

Avatar
Ghedebrav replied to drheaton | 11 years ago
0 likes
drheaton wrote:

I don't want to give tips really but you always have the option of dropping both Martin and Rogers and picking up Contador/Voeckler/Rolland/Pinot plus one cheaper guy.

Gadret and Coppel are decent shouts at under 9 credits and riders like Bonnet (5.2) and Hoogerland (6.2) can pick up a few points. My worry with Rogers/Martin is that both will top 10 in the GC but not actually score many fantasy points on their way there finishing 15-20th each day and picking up minor points but being consistently average.

I've got a tenner on Rogers to finish top ten in GC - at 14/1.

Avatar
chrisdstripes replied to Stumps | 11 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:
chrisdstripes wrote:

Yeah, Kittel is a worry, as he also has Degenkolb to share stages with, and we don't know if he has what it takes to get to Paris. 17 credits tho' - might just about be worth it...

It might muck your team up a bit but i've gone for Bennati. He is 18.6 credits and in my opinion a better sprinter than Kittel. Just a thought for you to ponder  3

Thanks Stumps! I'd say Kittel is faster than Bennati, and will have the whole team working for him on 5-6 stages, whereas Bennati will get over the lumps better and is more likely to get to Paris, but does he still have the finishing power? And with his teammates looking after Alberto? Down to personal taste, and Bennati has done naff-all for me every time I've picked him, including dropping out of last year's Giro after about 6 stages when I had him in purist. So my decision is based at least partly on spite... Possibly not the most sensible criteria on which to base my selections...  1

Avatar
frankiejay | 11 years ago
0 likes

Picked my final team. I'll show my cards because, honestly, it's all in fun. We'll call this the stars, scrubs and Schleck approach. Feel free to critique:

Froome
Sagan
Quintana
Dennis
Schleck
Hoogerland
El Fares
Mederel
Fischer

Avatar
JAndrewHill | 11 years ago
0 likes

None of those. I Went for three riders almost guaranteed more than one outright win. Plus Likely breakaways.

Avatar
andynic | 11 years ago
0 likes

Really hard. I'll probably change it all again, but at the moment down to a choice between Porte, Dan Martin and Quintana (or anyone cheaper, I guess) for my purist team. Any thoughts?

Avatar
Stumps | 11 years ago
0 likes

Dr, they were just 2 examples rather than list the whole lot mate. I get what you mean though about sacrificing one just to get another who MIGHT do something.

People have complained about the values but i think its great, we are really having to think about who to put in to get a balanced team.  4

Avatar
chrisdstripes replied to Stumps | 11 years ago
0 likes
stumps wrote:

Dr, they were just 2 examples rather than list the whole lot mate. I get what you mean though about sacrificing one just to get another who MIGHT do something.

People have complained about the values but i think its great, we are really having to think about who to put in to get a balanced team.  4

I think its pretty good (as opposed to great), I just wish the list of sub-5 credit riders was a bit longer. I'll shut up now before I turn into Enrique.

Avatar
enrique replied to chrisdstripes | 11 years ago
0 likes
enrique wrote:

[A]nother bit of useless trivia :)...

Ok, here I go again... It's taken me a while, but, here's my stab at what might have been the Best Purist Team Possible for the 2013 Tour!  1

40.0 Peter Sagan
28.8 Michal Kwiatkowski
25.3 Nairo Alexander Quintana Rojas
17.2 Marcel Kittel
11.7 Mikel Nieve Ituralde
9.1 Danny Van Poppel
8.4 Christophe Riblon
5.2 William Bonnet
3.7 Julien El Fares

For a total of 1881 points! Good enough to have come in No. 779 in the Overall Competition! With no transfers!  1

You know, I could have never imagined a Purist Team without Froome on it!  7

Pages

Latest Comments