Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

forum

Tesla investigation deepens... (Graundia)

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jun/09/tesla-autopilot-crash...

Quote:

US federal regulators are deepening their investigation into Tesla’s Autopilot function after more than a dozen Tesla cars crashed into parked first-responder vehicles over a period of four years.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) said on Thursday it was upgrading its preliminary investigation, which launched last August, to an “engineering analysis”, which is taken before the agency determines a recall.

The investigation covers all four Tesla vehicles – Models Y, X, S and 3 – representing about 830,000 vehicles that have been sold in the US.

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

35 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
1 like

brooksby wrote:

I hope that accusation is in tin foil hat territory?

But does lead me onto something - is the Tesla software and its updates valid for the life of the car or do you have to pay a separate subscription for firmware updates etc?  Imagine being on a long journey when suddenly you're told that your car has been bricked...

From https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/us-agency-upgrades-tesla-autopilot-safety-probe-2022-06-09/

Quote:

NHTSA said its analysis indicated that Forward Collision Warnings activated in the majority of incidents just prior to impact and that subsequent Automatic Emergency Braking intervened in approximately half of the crashes.

"On average in these crashes, Autopilot aborted vehicle control less than one second prior to the first impact," the agency added.

NHTSA noted that "where incident video was available, the approach to the first responder scene would have been visible to the driver an average of 8 seconds leading up to impact."

The agency also reviewed 106 reported Autopilot crashes and said in approximately half, "indications existed that the driver was insufficiently responsive to the needs of the dynamic driving task."

"A driver’s use or misuse of vehicle components, or operation of a vehicle in an unintended manner does not necessarily preclude a system defect," the agency said.

You could argue that the Autopilot is supposed to turn over control to the driver in the event of something unexpected and certainly crashing may be described as unexpected, but rescinding control within a second of the collision certainly seems like an easy way to improve the Autopilot figures. What's needed is to examine the whole system of car, driver and Autopilot and determine how well the parts work together.

Avatar
brooksby replied to AlsoSomniloquism | 2 years ago
0 likes

AlsoSomniloquism wrote:

"use of this service is at your own risk and we can't be sued if the car decides to drive into the Thames by itself"

Wasn't that the method used by Sontaran pawns to kill off a journalist?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 2 years ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

Wasn't that the method used by Sontaran pawns to kill off a journalist?

Can't find that specific chess set

Avatar
AlsoSomniloquism replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
3 likes

That chess must be interesting to play with. Do the rooks on black only move if all whites pieces are looking away?

And surely white king will just disappear in space/time if surrounded. 

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 2 years ago
1 like

Pages

Latest Comments