Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

forum

Through traffic to be banned in parts of Bristol for ‘liveable neighbourhood’ scheme

//i.pinimg.com/originals/fb/4b/76/fb4b76fcc102a925a6fb0a726f536948.jpg)

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/through-traffic-banned-parts-bristol-8295492

//i2-prod.bristolpost.co.uk/incoming/article8295503.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/0_East-Bristol-Liveable-Neighbourhood.jpg)

This should be introduced towards the end of this year as an experimental trial - I wish it could happen sooner as it covers where I live. We had questionnaires about it during lockdown, though I think that was just about making Beaufort Rd (by the cemetery) one way to motorised traffic.

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

136 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 3 weeks ago
2 likes

slc wrote:

Agreed, largely. I have a bit (not too much) of sympathy for the 'not consulted' claim. I replied to the original consultation as did many others and the top items were improved crossings and junctions. These were ruled out as impossible for a trial - too expensive - but they are needed. Working on those and a smaller LTN might have been less contentious and increased the chances of acceptance across Bristol. Or maybe drivers would moan about even the loss of the odd parking space.

I definitely agree that we could do with better crossings and junctions.

Obviously I'm very firmly on the pedestrian/cyclist side as I don't drive, but I do think that drivers will complain about any changes as they've currently allocated the maximum possible amount of space, so changes are bound to have a negative impact on them. Ultimately, we have to make driving more difficult as there's far too many cars/drivers on our roads and it's ruining people's health.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

Looks like some Barton Hill residents don't want the Liverpool Neighbourhood or at least not Marsh Lane to be a no-through-road:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/residents-take-streets-stop-liveable-9716152

I'm somewhat torn as I'm all for closing off roads to rat-running, but I also like that style of protesting - reminds me of Arthur Dent lying down in front of the bulldozer coming for his house.

Avatar
slc replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
1 like

TBH the west (Barton Hill) part of the scheme looks like a much larger change than the east (Beaufort Rd) part. Some drivers living in the west will add a couple of kilometres to their journeys including some very congested sections, unless they switch modes. The planners have tried to accommodate this by allowing e.g care workers' cars through the bus gates, maybe that will prove the right balance in the long term.

When I first saw the scheme plans I did honestly wonder if it would be better to designate Avonvale Rd and Marsh Lane as boundary roads and furnish them appropriately. But of course that would mean taking away much of the car parking, so also controversial.

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
1 like

Evening Post wrote:

“We didn’t know they were coming, but somebody dropped a message on our WhatsApp and people just came out of their homes to stop this,” said Melissa Topping, who is in a wheelchair and lives at Victoria Avenue. She said the Liveable Neighbourhood would cause her huge issues with driving her large adapted car back home on the only route left to reach her house - down a narrow side road into her ‘LTN zone’.

“A couple of the workers completely understood where we were coming from when we explained that this would make things so much harder for the residents to get about,” she said. “We just told them that we weren’t going to be moving, so they would have to go away again, and they did. We were peaceful and they were very nice, and we do feel sorry for them, because they are only trying to do their job, but we can’t let this happen here,” she added.

“There are people who have to take their children to two or three different schools and then get to work. It’s simply not practical for people who need to drive and live around here, and the traffic is much much worse on the roads that everyone is now being funnelled down,” she added.

Ms Topping said she fully expected the council and its contractors to come back at some stage. “People power does work, but they are going to come back and we can’t be everywhere to stop this from happening,” she said. “We know they are going to come back, probably in the middle of the night, or something.”

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
2 likes

Neighbourhood: you can't change anything because we have a disabled resident!  Also driving children to schools!  People power!

Also neighbourhood: continue driving and parking everywhere making it a PITA (or sometimes more) for the disabled resident, and not safe enough for children to walk or cycle to school.  "Lots of people" power (occasionally sympathetic, well meaning but generally I have to drive / park right here now so it's someone else's problem).

Avatar
slc | 1 month ago
0 likes

More stuff: now we have some bus gates on Avonvale Rd and Pilemarsh. I have been looking at fixmystreet to see if anyone complains (or applauds) the LTN features, and this amused me

https://www.fixmystreet.com/report/6729314

It shows a brand new 'no motor vehicles sign' hidden behind vegetation. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 month ago
2 likes

slc wrote:

More stuff: now we have some bus gates on Avonvale Rd and Pilemarsh. I have been looking at fixmystreet to see if anyone complains (or applauds) the LTN features, and this amused me

https://www.fixmystreet.com/report/6729314

It shows a brand new 'no motor vehicles sign' hidden behind vegetation. 

Why didn't they clip the vegetation back? It can easily be challenged if the sign is obscured.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

slc wrote:

More stuff: now we have some bus gates on Avonvale Rd and Pilemarsh. I have been looking at fixmystreet to see if anyone complains (or applauds) the LTN features, and this amused me

https://www.fixmystreet.com/report/6729314

It shows a brand new 'no motor vehicles sign' hidden behind vegetation. 

Why didn't they clip the vegetation back? It can easily be challenged if the sign is obscured.

Are you quite mad? They're the sign installation department - not the hedge clipping department. Where would we be if every Tom, Dick, and Harry took it on themselves to go around clipping hedges? It would be chaos!

Avatar
brooksby replied to mdavidford | 1 month ago
4 likes

mdavidford wrote:

Are you quite mad? They're the sign installation department - not the hedge clipping department. Where would we be if every Tom, Dick, and Harry took it on themselves to go around clipping hedges? It would be chaos!

<sucks teeth>  "Ah, well, you 'ave a point but it'd be moranmejobswurf"

Avatar
slc replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
2 likes
brooksby wrote:

mdavidford wrote:

Are you quite mad? They're the sign installation department - not the hedge clipping department. Where would we be if every Tom, Dick, and Harry took it on themselves to go around clipping hedges? It would be chaos!

<sucks teeth>  "Ah, well, you 'ave a point but it'd be moranmejobswurf"

I have sympathy for the sign installation guy. The vegetation is overhang from a private garden, so the sign guy may well be instructed to report only.

Incidentally, the bus gate enforcement will not begin right away. Apparently there will be some variable signs notifying that.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 month ago
3 likes

slc wrote:

I have sympathy for the sign installation guy. The vegetation is overhang from a private garden, so the sign guy may well be instructed to report only. Incidentally, the bus gate enforcement will not begin right away. Apparently there will be some variable signs notifying that.

I've just been up Pilemarsh and there were quite a few cars using it too - I imagine quite a few drivers will get caught out when they start enforcement.

Avatar
slc | 1 month ago
3 likes

It didn't take long! My second time through and came across a delivery van driver mounting the pavement to get around the modal filter at the bottom of Beaufort Rd. He was quite apologetic but also seemed to think he had no option, even though the delivery address was right next to the filter.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 month ago
4 likes

slc wrote:

It didn't take long! My second time through and came across a delivery van driver mounting the pavement to get around the modal filter at the bottom of Beaufort Rd. He was quite apologetic but also seemed to think he had no option, even though the delivery address was right next to the filter.

Just the other day, Mrs HawkinsPeter remarked that our road seemed a lot quieter without all the rat-running and there's notably more traffic queues along Blackswarth Road (possibly also Church Road though I think that may already be saturated).

Meanwhile, here's a positive reaction to the planters that I saw being deployed next to St George's Park:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/can-streets-anti-van-dweller-9696482

//i2-prod.bristolpost.co.uk/incoming/article9688852.ece/ALTERNATES/s810/0_BRI_PG_051124planters-3.jpg)

(I've got mixed feelings about moving on van dwellers, but they were taking over that section of the park which isn't really fair on other residents around there)

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
4 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

slc wrote:

It didn't take long! My second time through and came across a delivery van driver mounting the pavement to get around the modal filter at the bottom of Beaufort Rd. He was quite apologetic but also seemed to think he had no option, even though the delivery address was right next to the filter.

Just the other day, Mrs HawkinsPeter remarked that our road seemed a lot quieter without all the rat-running and there's notably more traffic queues along Blackswarth Road (possibly also Church Road though I think that may already be saturated).

Meanwhile, here's a positive reaction to the planters that I saw being deployed next to St George's Park:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/can-streets-anti-van-dweller-9696482

//i2-prod.bristolpost.co.uk/incoming/article9688852.ece/ALTERNATES/s810/0_BRI_PG_051124planters-3.jpg)

(I've got mixed feelings about moving on van dwellers, but they were taking over that section of the park which isn't really fair on other residents around there)

I saw that article - people saying 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop pavement parking' - but I suspect that the writers meant 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop other people pavement parking'

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

I saw that article - people saying 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop pavement parking' - but I suspect that the writers meant 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop other people pavement parking'

Driving is the best thing in the world, if it weren't for all those other drivers parking antisocially, parking in "our" spot, pulling in and out when we want to get through, driving poorly, making unnecessary journeys and causing congestion ... not to mention all the pollution they generate, the damage they do crashing into things AND the potholes they cause.

If only they'd just stop and let us get on with it... (also see the cycle-centric version of "if only we removed all the dangerous / bad drivers we'd have no problems on the roads / people would be happy to cycle there (instead)").

Avatar
slc replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
0 likes
brooksby wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

slc wrote:

It didn't take long! My second time through and came across a delivery van driver mounting the pavement to get around the modal filter at the bottom of Beaufort Rd. He was quite apologetic but also seemed to think he had no option, even though the delivery address was right next to the filter.

Just the other day, Mrs HawkinsPeter remarked that our road seemed a lot quieter without all the rat-running and there's notably more traffic queues along Blackswarth Road (possibly also Church Road though I think that may already be saturated).

Meanwhile, here's a positive reaction to the planters that I saw being deployed next to St George's Park:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/can-streets-anti-van-dweller-9696482

//i2-prod.bristolpost.co.uk/incoming/article9688852.ece/ALTERNATES/s810/0_BRI_PG_051124planters-3.jpg)

(I've got mixed feelings about moving on van dwellers, but they were taking over that section of the park which isn't really fair on other residents around there)

I saw that article - people saying 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop pavement parking' - but I suspect that the writers meant 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop other people pavement parking'

It looks to me as though pavement parking on Beaufort Road has increased since the filters arrived. Perhaps drivers think that it is OK now that the through traffic is gone.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
2 likes

brooksby wrote:

I saw that article - people saying 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop pavement parking' - but I suspect that the writers meant 'can we have those planters everywhere to stop other people pavement parking'

I thought they were wanting them to stop large vehicles parking - most notably caravans that people live in. As the planters are on the road, they dont necessarily stop pavement parking, but would make it more awkward as the driver would have to turn in to the gap.

Previously, that particular corner of St George's Park had caravans/lorries all along the park and visibility was very much reduced, but it's not as though drivers can reach any speed along there anyway as the road is narrow and has a blind corner due to the houses anyway.

 

Avatar
wtjs | 1 month ago
2 likes

This is an interesting topic- it's good to see somewhere making some progress against the Tory/ Torygraph/ hyper-junk Mail-inspired routine Two Minute Hates in various parts of the country

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to wtjs | 1 month ago
3 likes

wtjs wrote:

This is an interesting topic- it's good to see somewhere making some progress against the Tory/ Torygraph/ hyper-junk Mail-inspired routine Two Minute Hates in various parts of the country

It's about time - I created this topic back in 2023 and the scheme was supposed to be implemented towards the end of 2023. Still, better late than never. I wonder how much our Green-led council influenced this.

Avatar
slc replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
7 likes

It wouldn't work at all where wtjs lives. That bloke with the no-MOT monster truck would  barge them (edit:the planters) out of the way while the cops applauded.

Avatar
wtjs replied to slc | 1 month ago
3 likes

It wouldn't work at all where wtjs lives

True- nothing works here owing to the determinedly anti-cyclist police b******s. This is the Stagecoach 42 bus this afternoon

https://upride.cc/incident/sk19evw_stagecoach42_closepass/

Avatar
brooksby replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

wtjs wrote:

This is an interesting topic- it's good to see somewhere making some progress against the Tory/ Torygraph/ hyper-junk Mail-inspired routine Two Minute Hates in various parts of the country

It's about time - I created this topic back in 2023 and the scheme was supposed to be implemented towards the end of 2023. Still, better late than never. I wonder how much our Green-led council influenced this.

I notice that they've backpedalled (geddit!) a lot on Doing Something about pavement parking in Bristol, though.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to brooksby | 1 month ago
7 likes

brooksby wrote:

I notice that they've backpedalled (geddit!) a lot on Doing Something about pavement parking in Bristol, though.

They've got the concept of a plan for it

Avatar
slc | 1 month ago
4 likes

The first modal filter is in. I was impressed by how neatly done it looked on my way through, admittedly during the winter dark. No sign of unrest so far.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 month ago
2 likes

I went past the back of St George's Park yesterday and they were deploying big planters (with some kind of crane) around the corner of Lake View Rd and Park Crescent. I overheard someone talking to a car driver and they both agreed that it was much better than all the caravans that used to be there.

Haven't checked out Beaufort Rd yet (I'll be going along there tomorrow morning), but I'm hoping that's had something done with it.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

Big heavy plant pots beat paint and signs any day of the week. Also they avoid being "for bloody cyclists - and I've only seen 3 this week" while potentially being very effective creating conditions where more people might cycle (or at least consider not driving that trip).

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to chrisonabike | 1 month ago
5 likes

Just used Beaufort Rd and it's blocked at one end to cars with big planters (way too big to move without machinery). It was a lot more pleasant cycling along there as before there'd be a long queue of traffic to overtake with oncoming vehicles to dodge too.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

...and now residents have been 'let down' by traffic scheme before it even starts: https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/residents-let-down-traffic-scheme-9504500

Apparently, they need a pharmacy and a dentist instead, but there's both on Church Road just about 5 minutes away. There's also the Wellspring GP surgery, but they have trouble getting appointments there (I don't use it much, but haven't had an issue getting an appointment myself, though it's not usually the same day).

Avatar
slc replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
6 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

...and now residents have been 'let down' by traffic scheme before it even starts: https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/residents-let-down-traffic-scheme-9504500

Good to see some LTN opposition classics.

"How can I achieve X when my road will be closed"

"Councils should fix the buses before introducing any limitations on cars"

"Councils should fix the NHS/schools/other things that definitely could be improved but are separate issues from traffic, before trying to reduce traffic"

Avatar
slc | 2 months ago
2 likes

I live here too.

The consultations in lockdown were indeed about the whole scheme - the Beaufort Road one way was part of an earlier proposal that was shelved following opposition from motorists arguing for their right to ratrun.

I think the part to watch will be Avonvale road (western half of the scheme). The scope of the change here is much larger than around Beaufort Rf, and will depend largely on bus gates rather than modal filters. We have seen in Exeter that motorists will ignore these without enforcement.

Pages

Latest Comments