Alexandre Vinokourov, winner of Liège-Bastogne-Liège in 2010, and the runner-up in that race, Alexander Kolobnev, may face criminal charges in Belgium for corruption, according to press reports from that country.
Ever since Vinokourov’s victory in the race, the year after he returned from a doping ban, there have been rumours that he did a deal with Kolobnev to rig the result, with Vinokourov, riding for Astana at the time, allegedly agreeing to pay Katusha's Kolobnev €150,000 to take it easy in the final sprint.
Vinokourov, now the Kazakh outfit’s manager, won the race, the oldest of cycling’s five monuments, by six seconds from the Russian.
Sudinfo.be reports that the magistrate investigating the affair, Philippe Richard, decided in May that the pair should be charged with the offence of private corruption, although the website says that the decision has been kept a closely guarded secret.
In November 2012, it emerged that investigators in Italy had identified two payments, one of €50,000, the other of €100,000, going from Vinokourov’s bank account in Monaco to that of Kolobnev in Switzerland. They also discovered an exchange of emails purportedly between Kolobnev and Vinokourov.
According to a report in The Guardian at the time, the former is claimed to have written the day after the race: "Remember well, I had a great chance … I didn't do it for the contract but rather for the situation you found yourself in … if it had been someone else in your place I would have raced for the win, for the glory and the bonuses … now I'm waiting patiently. Take my transfer information and put them somewhere else and erase the email."
The alleged reply from Vinokourov came 12 days later and read: "Hi Kolobok, sorry that I took so long to respond. Don't worry, you did everything right … as far as the agreement goes, don't worry, I'll take care of everything."
Vinokourov, who retired after winning Olympic gold in London in 2012, doesn’t dispute paying the money to Kolobnev – in July 2012, he told journalists he had done so but insisted he had nothing to hide and the payment was a loan, a private matter between the two, and nothing to do with his Liège-Bastogne-Liège win.
World cycling’s governing body, the UCI had earlier launched an investigation but no further action was taken, and in response to those reports in 2012 of the bank transfers, former spokesman Enrico Carpani insisted, “It’s a very old story.”
Sudinfo.be adds that the file is currently making its way through the court system in Liège ahead of potential indictments being brought, a process it says could take several months.
Add new comment
10 comments
+1 pwake. Reading between the lines that means possible outside influences i.e. Gambling/race fixing.
Though that seems like a hard thing to do with the numbers in the peloton, it is not impossible. Though whether that is the case, or some other factor the UCI/Belgian authorities are probably concerned with the amount of money passing hands.
A man dishing out £150,000 pay days is always going to be popular in the peloton.
I keep hearing that Vino The Vampire is actually a really nice guy and well liked by people who know him but from where i am sitting (on my arse in my front room on general trolling duty) he seems like a right proper wrong un.
Just where is the problem? Riders have been buying races like this for at least a century. You scratch my back etc. It's commercial business not a school sports day.
I assume that all those who disagree will also have a go at the sacred Tom Simpson who wasn't beyond this trick. There is a photo of him braking in a sprint for the line.
I'd agree, but as Blackhound noted this is an exceptional amount of money. Agreements made on the road seem to usually consist of a return of the favour or a split of prize money; this doesn't add up in this case as the prize money for L-B-L was about €20k. If the payment was related to contracts or similar then, in any business, that is likely breaking some law? That seems to be the problem...
I keep think 150,000 euro is a lot to throw a race. Prize money and bonuses would hardly cover it (would it?) and even for the prestige of a major win it seems a large inducement to offer another rider. Something fishy here.
"riding on a nettle and barbed wire saddle coated in chilli whilst suffering from severe case of the nobby styles"
You have been watching too much 'Jackass' on tv
usual legal uci pace. It's not the crime of the century, it's not buried behind loads of secrets. Either they did, or they didn't, and it looks like they did, so get on with it, my dislike for vino is right up there with riding on a nettle and barbed wire saddle coated in chilli whilst suffering from severe case of the nobby styles. He is a vile little man who does not belong in the sport.
I know the IOC is a sent as a 3 bob note but can't they slap a retrospective on Vinnie somehow and take that medal off him?
Still embarrassing to remember the near silence in homes around the country as he as he crossed the line on the Mall. It felt like the only one cheering was Vinnie.
What I like about Vinokourov is what a good advertisement for cycling he is.
If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck...