Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Radio Two's Jeremy Vine busted for speeding in Hyde Park - on his bike

DJ was riding at 16mph, told by radar-toting cop the limit is 5mph

Radio Two DJ and commuting cyclist Jeremy Vine has been busted for speeding in Hyde Park - for doing a mighty 16 miles per hour.

Vine announced his new-found outlaw status on Twitter this morning, with this video clip:

As one of the Royal Parks, Hyde Park is something of a law unto itself when it comes to setting speed limits on cyclists and even skateboarders and roller bladers, but this limit seems to be poorly posted at best. Google StreetView doesn't show any limit signs that we've been able to find in a few minutes' exploring and when he was asked if there were signs, Vine said: "Not ... really ...."

As Vine himself observes, the problem with a strategy of cracking down on 'speeding' on a very safe route away from motor vehicles is that cyclists will be forced on to the far more dangerous roads around Hyde Park instead. Asked by the London Cycling Campaign if he needed any help or advice, he replied:

 

 

But the last word has to go to Vine's producer at Radio Two:

John has been writing about bikes and cycling for over 30 years since discovering that people were mug enough to pay him for it rather than expecting him to do an honest day's work.

He was heavily involved in the mountain bike boom of the late 1980s as a racer, team manager and race promoter, and that led to writing for Mountain Biking UK magazine shortly after its inception. He got the gig by phoning up the editor and telling him the magazine was rubbish and he could do better. Rather than telling him to get lost, MBUK editor Tym Manley called John’s bluff and the rest is history.

Since then he has worked on MTB Pro magazine and was editor of Maximum Mountain Bike and Australian Mountain Bike magazines, before switching to the web in 2000 to work for CyclingNews.com. Along with road.cc founder Tony Farrelly, John was on the launch team for BikeRadar.com and subsequently became editor in chief of Future Publishing’s group of cycling magazines and websites, including Cycling Plus, MBUK, What Mountain Bike and Procycling.

John has also written for Cyclist magazine, edited the BikeMagic website and was founding editor of TotalWomensCycling.com before handing over to someone far more representative of the site's main audience.

He joined road.cc in 2013. He lives in Cambridge where the lack of hills is more than made up for by the headwinds.

Add new comment

66 comments

Avatar
Must be Mad | 10 years ago
0 likes
Quote:

Comments on road.cc are always so predictable. No one here seems to care about the interests or safety of those not on a bike. Rules are for those other bastards etc.

Are you aware how ridiculously slow 5mph is?

At that speed the cyclists will need protection from the pedestrians whizzing past....

Personally I think the parks authority need to justify why the 5mph limit is necessary, and why it is not signposted.

Avatar
thebongolian | 10 years ago
0 likes

I ride through there everyday (and used to have the Strava KOM...) and saw the cops this morning though most were actually PCOs.

I can confirm there are no signs pointing out the speed limit along this section. Moreover Vine is quite right, if they do expect people to ride at 5 mph I (and many others) will just go and ride along South Carriage. Fortunately that's a pretty safe alternative.

Two things about this though:

1) Think the Parks are now owned by the Mayor (rather than central Government as used to the case) so Boris Johnson should tell them to go hang. He's also the PCC for the Met should give them a dressing down for wasting resources.

2) There's a ruddy great big horse track next parallel to the shared use path. It wouldn't be hard to give up some of that for cycling and it'd have no impact on pedestrians.

Avatar
Al__S | 10 years ago
0 likes

The Royal parks dislike cycling. There's plenty of space for several wide, high quality separate cycleways through the parks without overly impinging upon green space. Instead they paint a line down a path and impose a punitive speed limit.

Avatar
dreading | 10 years ago
0 likes

Of course... if enough people fall off their bikes and have any pain or injury then report it to the parks police. If being forced to ride so slowly may have caused the injury then this limit would have to be reviewed.
If it was difficult to ride so slow then many may fall off....

Avatar
brackley88 | 10 years ago
0 likes

I have just sent a Freedom of Information request to Royal Parks for information on all the speed limits at different points on Parks cycle lanes.....suggest several hundred others do the same to ensure we all have the information required to be able to comply with their very unclear rules.

cycle [at] royalparks.gsi.gov.uk

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 10 years ago
0 likes

What about the Broad Walk in Regents Park? The KOM is well over 20mph (which can only be achieved at dawn). There are no speed limit signs anywhere.

Avatar
sw1sst | 10 years ago
0 likes

...and the average speed of someone running (for arguments sake training for a marathon) is ?

Avatar
hampstead_bandit | 10 years ago
0 likes

As a previous poster commented, a bicycle is not required (by law) to be fitted with a speedometer, and there are no bicycle speedometers that meet DOT specifications for calibration and accuracy.

So, can any legal expert advise road.cc readers (and the Police if reading this thread) how a cyclist can accurately gauge their speed to comply with a 5mph speed limit?

Surely, the Police could be challenged using this information; its not commonly known that the Police will often rely on the ignorance of the general public to readily accept any accusations made "You fit the description of someone seen in the area.."

Was there a recent case against a Richmond Park cyclist that was overturned on appeal because the cyclist contested his ability to gauge his speed with any accuracy after the Police fined him for speeding in the park?

Avatar
fenix | 10 years ago
0 likes

5mph on a bike is very slow. I'm not sure I've ever done that on the road.

I run at over 5mph though - I'd be interested in the bloke who says that he walks at 5mph. Thats almost twice the speed I do and I've never been passed by someone at that speed !

Avatar
fenix | 10 years ago
0 likes

5mph on a bike is very slow. I'm not sure I've ever done that on the road.

I run at over 5mph though - I'd be interested in the bloke who says that he walks at 5mph. Thats almost twice the speed I do and I've never been passed by someone at that speed !

Avatar
burtthebike | 10 years ago
0 likes

It's a Royal Park, so let's sponsor Prince Charles to ride his bike through it at 10mph and see if they book him.

Avatar
msfergus | 10 years ago
0 likes

I'm not entirely sure, but if you listen carefully and have audio enhancement software, I'm sort of sure you can hear 'f**k off you pleb, do you know who I am? I pay your wages and I earn a load more than you' I think I'm right and it'll be in a National Newspaper tomorrow morning.........

Avatar
TheCyclingRooster | 10 years ago
0 likes

This has currently got to be one of the greatest wastes of Police time,resources and effort anywhere in this increasingly
over sensitive and under funded nanny state.
I wonder how prat -like the offices must feel doing such a demeaning job as busting and treating the cyclist like they are being told off by mummy or daddy.
Which over-paid and under utilised individual thought this one up?

Avatar
Condor flyer | 10 years ago
0 likes

From what I can see from the pictures provided by Mr Vine's webcam, the shared path is not wide enough to safely accommodate both cyclists and pedestrians without risk of conflict.
Such a cycling path needs to be properly engineered as a clearly defined separate roadway, and be at least two metres wide with an angled raised kerb separating it from the adjacent walkway.

Avatar
fret | 10 years ago
0 likes

According to the Royal Parks there is no law to keep at 5mph, so it's not enforceable and besides, I doubt the radar gun was calibrated for use on a bicycle as the frontal signature is too small to record accurate readings.
But I agree any shared path with pedestrians you should moderate your speed. Hitting someone on a bike at 16 mph or more with a combined weight of 100kgs or more will hurt someone, possibly both parties.

Avatar
darth | 10 years ago
0 likes

I agree with: How can one be done for speeding, if there is no VOSA recognised speedo on a bike!

Also... I just tried walking fast (to the point where it became uncomfortable for me), and achieved 3.2 MPH. This was using Wahoo Fitness app on my iPhone 5s. (I've tested this against the old magnet system - with the exact circumference etc.)

And... Personally, I think 16 MPH is maybe too fast through the parks (if on a shared path). When I cycle on mostly flat roads with only marginal hills (Bath to Bristol), I average 18 MPH - and that's with me, as the police put it, making progress! Even 12-13 MPH on a road bike is a comfortably fast pace.  1

Avatar
Matt eaton replied to Al__S | 10 years ago
0 likes
Al__S wrote:

The Royal parks dislike cycling. There's plenty of space for several wide, high quality separate cycleways through the parks without overly impinging upon green space. Instead they paint a line down a path and impose a punitive speed limit.

I'm sure that you are right about the attitude of the Royal Parks to cycling. It does however beg the question why don't they simply ban cycling altogether in the Royal Parks? Is someone forcing them to make provision for cycling or something?

Avatar
mrmo replied to fenix | 10 years ago
0 likes
fenix wrote:

5mph on a bike is very slow. I'm not sure I've ever done that on the road.

Tried to go at walking pace, so a little slower and it is f***ing hard to maintain for any distance on the road, I can do it off road as I have something to push against, the hill. You do end up wandering all over trying to maintain balance. a 5mph speedlimit is really really stupidly slow!

Avatar
Rich71 | 10 years ago
0 likes

Pity the arseole wasnt stopped for his moronic radio 2 show,cretin

Avatar
Johnny25 | 10 years ago
0 likes

So predictable that it's all the police's fault. When ever there's a story that involves the police, automatically by default they are the trouble makes and instigators of all life's woes.

I'd imagine that someone has complained about cycling in the park and the police have responded by carrying out speed checks, which is what you would expect given the above.

In all fairness 16mph on a designated cycle route isn't that fast and 5mph is ridiculously slow and probably more dangerous. I far as I am aware, speed limits do not apply to cycles on roads or parks. It seems that Vine was given words of advice, hence no fine and I doubt he was 'cycling furiously'!

Avatar
PhilRuss | 10 years ago
0 likes

[[[[[ The parks-police (?) says to Jeremy Vine, "OY!". Funny, that. On TV police documentary footage, police always say, "Excuse me, sir...", or "Hello there--how you doin'--all right?", even to drivers stopped for serious motoring offences. Hmm...
P.R.

Avatar
Matt eaton | 10 years ago
0 likes

If the maximum safe speed is 5mph then the infrastructure is not fit for purpose. Either ban cycling altogether or sort it out.

Avatar
Airzound | 10 years ago
0 likes

The police really are cretins.

Avatar
dafyddp | 10 years ago
0 likes

So, before visiting London, I check the Royal Parks' website, 'Cycling In the Royal Parks' page:
https://www.royalparks.org.uk/parks/hyde-park/visitor-information/park-r...
I also download the link on that page for the Cycling Policy document:
https://www.royalparks.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/41813/the_roya...

As far as I can see, neither mention a limit

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 10 years ago
0 likes

Let me get this straight. So the park police have opted to enforce a law that no-one knew about and isn't indicated and which can't be applied to bicycles because they are not required by law to have a calibrated speedometer? It doesn't take the sharpest legal mind to see that there's something of a legal gap there.

I've ridden through Hyde Park many times along the designated cycle area on my old commute. I was there not so long ago too and don't remember seeing a sign.

Hands up anyone who rides there regularly who knew there was a speed limit and have seen signs.

And yes, Park Lane is like a racetrack. Perhaps the police would find a better use of their time turning the speed camera on some of the high powered vehicles roaring up and down there.

Avatar
Bikebikebike | 10 years ago
0 likes

I've cycled many many times through Hyde Park over the last twenty years, and have never seen anything about a speed limit. I've also done my fair share of rollerblading down on the Serpentine at more than 5mph, and never had a problem. Madness.

Avatar
birzzles | 10 years ago
0 likes

Comments on road.cc are always so predictable. No one here seems to care about the interests or safety of those not on a bike. Rules are for those other bastards etc.

Avatar
farrell replied to birzzles | 10 years ago
0 likes
birzzles wrote:

Comments on road.cc are always so predictable. No one here seems to care about the interests or safety of those not on a bike. Rules are for those other bastards etc.

I walk at more than 5mph.

Mobility scooters go faster than 5mph.

Joggers easily exceed 5mph.

This isn't really about speeds or safety is it?

Avatar
stuartp replied to farrell | 10 years ago
0 likes
farrell wrote:

I walk at more than 5mph.

I'll bet you don't

Avatar
shay cycles replied to stuartp | 10 years ago
0 likes

I occasionally used to walk to school, a little over six miles on cross country paths, in a smidge over an hour. It was definitely not running, I couldn't run that far! Of course I only did that occasionally for fun because on a bike it only took 20 minutes.

So I'd give Farrell the benefit of the doubt, you can certainly walk at over 5mph.

Pages

Latest Comments