- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
20 comments
Farrell
Thank you for your concern about my mother in law.
She died on Boxing day.
It's not just windscreens that motorists need to look at. I'm still seeing almost 10% of motor vehicles daily with bulbs out or beam aim too high. And nearly 5% with fog lights on.
On the continent, at least in the teutonic parts (Germany/Switzerland/Netherlands/Austria), clearing just a letter box from your windscreen gets you big trouble, up to a driving ban. All windows have to be cleared, fully, and no snow on the roof of the car either.
And satnavs that block your vision are also no-nos.
Why does this sort of common sense seem to be so hard in the UK?
Same applies in the UK. Have a look at Rule 229. Have a friend in traffic who would pull drivers in and make them clear snow off their roof, bonnet and boot. He would also ticket those who hadn't fully cleared windows, lights and plates. Meanwhile my dad hammered it home to me that the car didn't move until the windows were fully demisted and cleared. It drives me nuts in the winter when folk can't be arsed clearing their windows. Dad also had the windows spotless during the summer as he was convinced dirt and grease made visibility more difficult in sunshine. The bodywork would be filthy, but lights and windows spotless!
All of this.
People including me do all of the above.
If I choose to use a dark visor I can be tugged by the police for it.
What is the difference between using goggles that block 80%-90% whilst cycling and wearing sunglasses that block the same amount of light under a crash helmet or whilst driving?
Sensible answers only please.
Speed, weight, engines are three differences I can think of.
But you don't really want sensible answers do you? You just want to play the poor, put upon motorist troll.
How many decades is it that your mum/wife/aunt/sister has been imprisoned and unable to leave her home due to a cycle event that takes up half a day once a year?
One very simple answer, you take the glasses off if it gets dark, a visor is rather more integral to a helmet.
I carry a spare clear one for night use and take my chances with plod during the day. I find it preferable doing that rather than having 2 pieces of metal close to my head in an enclosed space.
Any body that says helmet visors are not easily changeable is just plain idle.
It's a sad day when the best large organisation that defends cyclists on the roads these days seems to be a private organisation dedicated to the motor car!
The police are too busy waving their little cameras at people on bikes going above twenty so I suppose someone has to pick up the slack.
In the early days of the AA the mechanics originally got around by bicycle looking out for broken down vehicles and warning drivers of hazards in the road. So even this car centric organisation had to rely on two wheels.
Lightly tinted windows are allowed on the windscreen but there are different rules for the rear windows and rear screen (wrongly in my opinion).
However very dark visors are illegal for motorcyclists, surely the same should apply for the goggles that a lot of cyclists use. Especially for ones like the guy riding in the dark last night.
I've got factory-tinted windows on the rear and rear screen. I wasn't keen on the aesthetics, but they are effective at keeping the babies out of direct sunlight. With regard to visibility, I don't have a problem seeing cyclists around me (although admittedly, I am at least looking for them). A bigger problem is contrast - I can see a cyclist in my mirror just fine, then another car (with headlights on) draws alongside them, and the difference in brightness renders the cyclist invisible. A flashing light seems to combat this fairly well.
I can't believe that tinted windows are legal, fancy deliberately reducing your viability. Would it be permitted on a train or plane?
Legal tints arent as tinted as you probably think. Law permits 75%, 70% transmission on windscreen, drivers windows respectively, where clear glass is approx 86%. The rear side windows of my Caddy have a factory tint - dunno the transmission % - can't see in very well but from inside the tint seems fairly subtle.
As a driver anda cyclist, I believe rear window tinting should also be at the same level as a front screen. Ok so some vehicles have now rear window, but of late its becoming morecommon to find yourself behind a car that you cannot see through, which especially in traffic makes it harder to see a cyclist or any other traffic ahead of theschedule vehicle in front which gives people less time to plan ahead or anticipate needing to slow down etc.It also leads to people driving at the edge of their lane to try to see past the vehicle ahead. This then means the wing mirrors of cars ahead are full of the car behind them, and not getting a view up the gap where they might see motor bikes, cyclists etc filtering or blue lights in the back of the queue trying to get through.
The other thing that needs to be looked at is lights on cars. There is no doubt they are getting brighter, and smaller. This means a relatively less bright light on a bike is much harder for drivers to pick out among a crowd of lights at night, especially in the rain.
Two points:
a) the majority of vans have solid rear doors
b) if you don't sit up the arse of the vehicle in front you have better visibilty of what's in front of it and a lot more time to react. Plus if it's a van in front he's got a better change of seeing you in his mirrors...see a)
You'd be surprised. I know a couple of people who have found, on being pulled over, that their factory tints are significantly darker than the legal limit.
I almost got taken out a couple of mornings ago. It was the first frost of the year and I pulled up at a T-Junction, in the "armpit" of the T planning to turn right. The view up the road on the left is always obscured by parked vans, so you have to stop to check what's coming. A car then hared round the vans and looking through their frosted side window/windscreen failed to see me waiting as they cut the corner off turning right into the road I was waiting on. I could see the look of horror on her passengers face when my presence became obvious - I couldn't see the driver because of the condensation! - she stopped a foot or so from my front wheel. My shout of "clean your windows" was greeted with a two fingered salute
Obscured windscreens isn't just a winter thing though. what really bugs me is all those drivers (cars,) vans and lorries) with satnavs fixed fairly high up centarally on their windscreens which must hide that part of the nearside view where cyclists are likely to be. And its not just satnavs, there appears to be a growing fad for very large dangly things hung on the rear view mirror which must also restrict vision to the front nearside. IMHO nothing should be positioned in that part of the screen, and an FPN issued for any vehicle which has.
Rant over!