New rules have come into effect which mean all heavy goods vehicles (HGVs) operating in London must be fitted with certain safety equipment. Seven of the eight cyclist deaths in the capital this year have involved HGVs.
The BBC reports how all HGVS operating within the capital must now be fitted with side guards to prevent cyclists being dragged underneath, as well as mirrors that give the driver an improved view of the area around their vehicle.
The new rules cover all roads in London except motorways and apply at all times. A breach of the ban carries a maximum £1,000 penalty with repeat offenders at risk of losing their operating licence.
Most HGVs are already required to fit side guards, but lorries involved in the construction industry have been exempt from that requirement. Similarly, while new lorries must have extended view mirrors fitted, older HGVs have been exempt.
London Mayor Boris Johnson described the scheme as a "life-saver."
"We are ahead of any other part of the UK in closing the legal loopholes that allowed many HGVs to operate without basic safety equipment.
"I am delighted that over the 18 months since we announced the safer lorry scheme, the vast majority of operators have got the message and fitted safety equipment to their vehicles in anticipation of the ban."
However, Natalie Chapman, of the Freight Transport Association, said the money used to launch the scheme would have been better spent on targeting lorries that don't comply with existing regulations.
Figures released by Transport for London in June revealed that almost three in four lorries stopped by police in the capital did not comply with the law, including legislation relating to safety.
The City of London Police Commercial Vehicle Unit, which was set up in May with funding from TfL, found that in its first month of operation, 95 of the 136 lorries stopped had to be taken off the road for non-compliance or safety reasons.
TfL says that issues identified included lack of insurance; driving without the appropriate licence; with unsafe tyres or an unsafe load; and not accurately recording driver hours.
Add new comment
11 comments
FFS - Just extend the powers of the HSE to the road network. Someone get hurt that road get shut down until declared safe.
Who cares about these or if it's in London only?
You can ban HGVs at certain times and put on all the safety features you like. Until people realise how dangerous they are fighting for every foot of road space instead of conceding space to allow everyone to finish their journey, things are not going to get better quickly.
A pistol laying on a table is not dangerous.
A pistol in someone's hand pointing at you is potentially lethal.
On the BBC site they have a video of a cyclist changing places with a lorry driver. You know, she can't see a cyclist outside and can't believe how poor the visibility is. Message? Take care cyclists.
Somehow the message of "how the hell did we end up with such a patently dangerously flawed vehicle on busy roads" goes a bit missing...................
I've suggested before that the Police should hold a changing places event with small children, the ones that lorry drivers can't see on pedestrian crossings. It might help a few people get the message about how ludicrous it is to have these vehicles on urban roads.
Great news on the new legislation, and about time too.
Have to say I do have some sympathy with the spokesperson suggesting Police should spend more time enforcing the existing laws, but what they fail to point out is that the cost of the new safety kit is borne by the companies wishing to conduct business (and make profit) in London. That sounds fairer than asking Police to spend some of their money checking that people are operating within the law.
would like to think could be extended to the rest of the UK and hopefully enforcement might be more efficient?
"The City of London Police Commercial Vehicle Unit, which was set up in May with funding from TfL, found that in its first month of operation, 95 of the 136 lorries stopped had to be taken off the road for non-compliance or safety reasons."
that's less than 5 "lorries" stopped per day
I'd ask for my money back
I sincerely hope this makes a difference
Moving in the right direction at least. Just don't rely on it to keep you safe. Always assume the dude in charge of the big truck doesn't know you're there and is probably on the phone to his depot getting brow-beaten for being late.
Hampstead_bandit, did you get it on cam? I reckon the Met and/or employer would follow that up. Blatant disregard of the law.
What about the lorry drivers busy talking on their hand held cell phones whilst in heavy traffic.
It's f*cking frightening how many HGV drivers I see every day during my commute across London, who will be driving and using their cell phone.
This morning by Aldgate, a guy in a big tipper going through the junction onto Commercial road making the turn whilst his right hand had the phone clamped to his head.
Some 'zero tolerance' Police enforcement with severe financial penalties / instant driving ban and HGV driver education is rapidly needed in London.
I use that junction every day. The only time I've seen the police (no more accurately - their Mickey mouse cousins) stopping anyone is cyclists for going over the White line...even when half the blue box is occupied by a hgv. They are a fucking joke...where are the real police when you need them? On the dole no doubt...
Well it's a start.
This comment got my back up:
"We are ahead of any other part of the UK in closing the legal loopholes that allowed many HGVs to operate without basic safety equipment."
They're not loopholes. They're oversights that should have been fixed twenty years ago.