Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Specialized apologises for anti-social cycling by its staff on company rides

Open letter published in local newspaper of brand's home town says employees will be reminded of the law...

Specialized has apologized to people living in the Californian city where it is based for anti-social riding by employees on lunchtime group rides from its headquarters.

The apology was made in an open letter from the US bike brand that was published on the website of local newspaper The Morgan Hill Times.

It came after a video was shared on Facebook last month by a journalist from San Francisco based TV station KRON4, who had received it from a viewer concerned about the behaviour of some of the cyclists.

The video was accompanied by an email from the viewer, whose name was not disclosed, in which a number of allegations were made against participants on the daily rides.

The viewer claimed:  “They run red lights, stop signs and in general take over the local streets. Although our little town has very wide bike lanes these riders ride 3-5 abreast and block all auto traffic in that direction.

“If there are children in the crosswalks as they run an intersection they are 'buzzed' by the cyclists that can number up to 60, zooming by at speed up to 24mph.

“I have seen the lead riders swarm cars that, although having the right of way, the lead cyclist seemed to feel were in their way.

“They beat on the sheet metal and pound on the glass of these cars. I have witnessed children in these cars in hysterics as they thought they would be harmed by the riders.”

The person said that they had contacted local police about the riders’ behaviour, who had in turn got in touch with Specialized.

They claimed to have received “thinly veiled threats” from people who said they worked for the company, and that Specialized had said part of the problem was hiring foreign riders who “do not understand US traffic laws” and that “many of the bikes being ridden are prototypes that must be tested in race track conditions so they are not required to obey traffic controls.”

The complainant also alleged that police were powerless to act because, according to a Specialized employee, the company has “an arrangement with the city that permits them to ride as they wish because they provide jobs and pay a large amount of property taxes.”

Whether or not there is any truth to some of those allegations, Specialized’s response showed that the company acknowledged that there was a problem and that among other things, it would remind staff of the rules of the road.

In its letter addressed to the Morgan Hill Community, the company said it “would like to apologize for the inconveniences caused by the large number of cyclists that ride each day from our company and the lack of riding etiquette while out on the roads of Morgan Hill.”

It went on: “Effective immediately we have changed our lunch ride route so it no longer goes through the Paradise Valley Neighborhood. We are working directly with Specialized employees to educate and enforce the California State Vehicle Code regulations as they pertain to cyclists.

Specialized added: “We are working closely with the Morgan Hill Police Department to create safer road situations for both cyclists and motorists and will be working together to plan a safety course in the near future.”

The company also said that it had drawn up “How We Roll” guidelines for participants on the rides, as follows:

RESPECT for all traffic laws, like responsible and intelligent adults

RESPECT to all those we encounter: motorists, riders, runners, kids in crosswalks, etc.

BE COOL and say hello to everyone we meet while out riding

DON’T FORGET that when we ride we are representing both Specialized and cyclists at large

BE RESPONSIBLE and have the courage to remind anyone that is not riding in accordance.

Specialized, which has been based in Morgan Hill for more than 35 years, added: “Going forward we are committed to following the rules of the road and being better at sharing with other people out and about.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

36 comments

Avatar
Accessibility f... replied to jmaccelari | 9 years ago
0 likes
jmaccelari wrote:

I'm not surprised. The CEO often sets the tone of the company, and if Mike Sinyard is anything to go by I am not surprised they act like thugs. I will not buy any SSpecialized products because of his litigious and antagonistic behaviour to the rest of the cycling industry...

You realise that companies have to actively protect their trademarks, lest they lose them?

Avatar
Simon E replied to Accessibility for all | 9 years ago
0 likes
Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

You realise that companies have to actively protect their trademarks, lest they lose them?

We do. But do you and imajez you not realise that in the case of the Canadian bike shop Cafe Roubaix the trademark wasn't even theirs to "enforce"?
http://road.cc/100452

The comment below is from another article on the same matter.

zedbedboy wrote:

I don't have any sympathy at all for the 'Big S'. They have a long and checkered history of this sort of behaviour. There are so many other ways to approach this problem. They opted to use the big stick approach and the stick doesn't even belong to them.

Someone at Spesh signed off on the lawyers actions. It's worked for them before so they thought they could get away with it again.

See these other links for the whole 9 yards....

http://bikeportland.org/2011/03/10/epic-wheel-works-will-change-name-due...

http://bikeportland.org/2006/01/31/specialized-mountain-cycle-disagree-o...

And this for an interesting opinion piece from a former lawyer....

http://redkiteprayer.com/2013/12/the-explainer-because-i-ing-hate-bullies/

You reap what you sow!

In the same week we found out that Specialized's lawyers were pursuing a clothing company called Epix.
http://road.cc/content/news/101165-specialized-drops-new-trademark-case-...

Avatar
Yorkshie Whippet | 9 years ago
0 likes

I don't understand how a motor vehicle travelling at 30mph is considered by many as slow, yet a cycle doing "upto 24mph" is zooming!

Avatar
Leodis | 9 years ago
0 likes

No defending that group, leaderless and no group or road etiquette

Avatar
LondonDynaslow | 9 years ago
0 likes

It's pretty sloppy riding to be honest, although most of the complaints are, as usual, misconceived. Be sure to watch the video before commenting  16

Avatar
offshore_dave | 9 years ago
0 likes

“many of the bikes being ridden are prototypes that must be tested in race track conditions so they are not required to obey traffic controls.”

Worth a try!

Pages

Latest Comments