Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

NSW cyclists face big increases in fines - and will have to carry photo ID

New laws aimed at defusing tensions between motorists and cyclists - but are they punitive?

The state of New South Wales in Australia is bringing in new laws from March next year that will make it compulsory for cyclists to carry photographic identification as well as introducing huge increases in fines for bike riders who break the law.

At the same time, drivers will be required to give cyclists at least a metre’s space when overtaking them – and more if they are travelling at a speed above 60 kilometres an hour.

The legislation is aimed at reducing tensions between motorists and cyclists, more than 1,500 of whom are admitted to hospitals in the state each year, according to Bernard Carlon, executive director of the Centre for Road Safety, quoted in an SBS report.

But NSW Greens transport spokeswoman Dr Mehreen Faruqi said the new fines, for offences including riding without a helmet, were punitive against cyclists.

"We will all benefit from a bike-friendly NSW, but the state government is going out of its way to make life harder and more dangerous for cyclists," she explained.

Outlining the new rules in a post on his official Facebook page yesterday, state premier Mike Baird said: “There aren't many topics that provoke more heated debate than road rules and cyclists.

“Anytime this comes up on talkback radio some driver will call in and say something like ‘Cyclists are a law unto themselves. They break the road rules whenever it suits them. They are totally dangerous’.

“And then a cyclist will call in and say ‘Drivers are lunatics who show no regard for our safety. They drive too closely to us and swerve at us. THEY are totally dangerous’.”

The Liberal politician continued: “Here’s what we want: cyclists to obey the road rules and drivers to not endanger cyclists.

“So, today we announced new laws that will hopefully help both of these things to happen.”

Here are the details of the forthcoming laws:

Drivers must give cyclists at least 1 metre space when overtaking (and at least 1.5 metres if you are travelling faster than 60km/h). This is designed to make cycling much safer and it has been campaigned for by many cycling advocates. Failure to do this will attract a fine and loss of 2 demerit points.

Cyclists must carry photo ID. (A photo of your ID on your phone is ok too.) We have rejected the idea of licences for cyclists. But we do think it is reasonable that if police need to issue a fine, they can identify the person they are speaking with.

Fines for cyclists are increasing from $71 to $425 for offences including running red lights and not stopping at pedestrian crossings. This brings these fines into line with what drivers pay for breaking road rules and will be more easily enforced with the new identification laws. These rules are for the safety of cyclists and other road users.

Mr Baird added: “I’m sure there will be heated debate about these new laws. What I hope is that we have struck the right balance in an effort to keep our roads safe.

“We want cyclists to be safe. We want them obeying the road rules. And we want drivers to be responsible when driving near cyclists.”

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

15 comments

Avatar
ron611087 | 8 years ago
0 likes

touché

 

Avatar
ron611087 | 8 years ago
0 likes

Just to get an idea on whether these measures are reasonable and proportionate. Cyclists contribute to how many road caualties as a percentage of the total. Anyone know?

Avatar
wycombewheeler | 8 years ago
0 likes

Downside - cyclists will be fined more for riding like tossers. Not an issue just follow traffic laws. Need to carry I'D? Always do this anyway in case the worst should happen. Small price to pay for 1m passing distance in law.

Avatar
Awavey replied to wycombewheeler | 8 years ago
1 like
wycombewheeler wrote:

Downside - cyclists will be fined more for riding like tossers. Not an issue just follow traffic laws. Need to carry I'D? Always do this anyway in case the worst should happen. Small price to pay for 1m passing distance in law.

sorry a small price to pay for a 1m passing law ? erm ok so who's measuring the distance all the time in those conflicts, will cyclists in Australia now need to buy video cameras and metre rules as well to monitor they are being given the 1m space at all times, because for some reason my skepticism says they wont, car drivers wont respect that law because no-one will be enforcing it and yet everytime they stop a cyclist even if theyve not broken a law, theyll fine them if they cant provide id on the spot.

a politician that uses talk radio as a reason to set policy is a frankly an idiot, and thats being polite

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to wycombewheeler | 8 years ago
0 likes
wycombewheeler wrote:

Downside - cyclists will be fined more for riding like tossers. Not an issue just follow traffic laws. Need to carry I'D? Always do this anyway in case the worst should happen. Small price to pay for 1m passing distance in law.

Seems like a nasty bit of bullying, in return for a law that ought to exist anyway and probably won't be enforced. I don't even _have_ a photo ID. Certainly wouldn't think much of being obliged to carry one just cos I have a bike with me. Completely ridiculous law.

Its pretty clear they really dislike active travel in Australia.

Avatar
Carton | 8 years ago
1 like

I don't really disagree with the photo ID thing, particularly since a "photo of your ID on your phone is ok too."

The fines seem a little daft since the risks posed by reckless cyclists are miniscule compared to the risks posed by reckless motorists, but well, seems like a compromise worth making for a space for cycling passing law, particularly given the amount of respect (disdain?) motorists would seem to generally have for cylists in Australia given the news coverage.

Avatar
Daveyraveygravey | 8 years ago
2 likes

I always take my driving licence when I go out on my bike - if I end up under a bus unconscious, or the other side of a hedge, how else will they identify me and let my family know?

Avatar
belgravedave | 8 years ago
0 likes

It's all about raising revenue in Australia nothing more nothing less. Motorists are massive cash cows and now it seems cyclists as well.

Avatar
Mungecrundle | 8 years ago
1 like

Assuming an ideal world where rules are actually enforced, so of course this is hypothetical to the point of being completely irrelevant and wouldn't even be an issue in the first place if people weren't congenital tits.

But

Would you be willing to swap a guaranteed 1m passing space in return for carrying some form of ID?

Avatar
bikebot | 8 years ago
10 likes

I wish there was a way for me to live slightly further away from Austrlia. The opposite side of the planet just doesn't seem far enough.

Avatar
cdamian | 8 years ago
0 likes

I am all for equal fines, if this would really make cycling any safer and would stop drivers from being so annoyed.

I would even pay a cycling tax if my money would be used for infrastructure and procecuting dangerous drivers. This is not going to happen though.

I saw this from the other end of the world (Berlin) today, where they introduced cops on bikes to help the cyclists. The result? They are mostly fining cyclists: https://vimeo.com/claudiabrueckner/cyclinginberlin#t=279s "Cycling in Berlin. (Theory vs. Reality)"

Avatar
Jaytee | 8 years ago
1 like

Cycle dangerously = $425 fine. Drive dangerously around cyclists (ie within 1 metre) = $319 fine. Very odd indeed.

Avatar
mrmo | 8 years ago
0 likes

If the fines are in line and the policing equal* is there really an issue? 

 

As for helmets..... 

 

 

*Do i believe the policing will be equal...... 

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to mrmo | 8 years ago
3 likes

mrmo wrote:

If the fines are in line and the policing equal* is there really an issue? 

 

As for helmets..... 

 

 

*Do i believe the policing will be equal...... 

I don't think the fines should be equal - they should be proportional to the amount of damage caused by the infractions (e.g. compare the number of people killed per red-light jumping incident by cars and bikes and structure the fines accordingly). Also, if they introduce mandatory helmets for bikes, they should introduce them for the car occupants as well.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 8 years ago
3 likes

**grabs deck-chair and big bag of popcorn - sits down and starts munching**

This gonna be interesting!

Latest Comments