- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Cyclists in Queensway tunnel (taken from YouTube video).jpg'Drunk' Mersey tunnel cyclists to be prosecuted for cycling while under the influence
Four men who cycled CityBikes through the Queensway tunnel after a night out are to be prosecuted for cycling when under the influence of drink or drugs. Footage of the incident had earlier spurred a Merseytravel committee member to call for a review of Mersey tunnel cycling rules.
The four cyclists reportedly took the decision to cycle home to Wallasey after a Boxing Day night out because they were unable to get a cab.
One of the cyclists, Jonny Ward, said: “It was a bit stupid and dangerous, and we’d had a few drinks – it wouldn’t have happened if we were sober – but it is legal to cycle at that time.”
It is not however legal to cycle when under the influence of drink. A Merseytravel spokeswoman told the Liverpool Echo that constables from the tunnels police force had stopped the cyclists at the time and will now prosecute.
“We are aware of the incident and can confirm that Mersey Tunnels Police stopped the cyclists who will be summonsed for prosecution under Section 30 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 – cycling when under the influence of drink or drugs.
“Cyclists using the Queensway tunnel are required to abide by the statutory regulations and laws that govern road users.”
According to Bike Hub’s page on Cycling and the Law, cyclists caught riding while intoxicated can be fined up to £2,500. Unlike driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, however, there is no set threshold beyond which an offence is committed.
The page says that unlike in some jurisdictions, cyclists found guilty of such an offence do not have their licences endorsed, although it also points out that under the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000, “the courts have the power to disqualify a cyclist from driving a car for any offence.”
There’s also a comprehensive analysis of the legal situation in the UK in this factsheet prepared by national cyclists’ charity, CTC.
Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.
Latest Comments
- Cugel 1 sec ago
Wot!? Such a goodly ship wasted as an attraction for gawpers with nothing better to do but gawp!?...
- David9694 31 min 14 sec ago
In Richard’s Bicycle Book, he surveys the bike market as it stood 40 years ago, going through from entry level to medium/ high end. How I used to...
- Rendel Harris 40 min 8 sec ago
Glad you like it - this week was the first proper commuting week since I got it, 250kms nice and warm but not boiled, indeed - and when the...
- Rendel Harris 2 hours 13 min ago
As what you have said is demonstrably untrue, given that the event is organised and has been for the last four years by a professional events...
- chrisonabike 2 hours 41 min ago
Accessibility issue. Of course by necessity / co- evolution the Dutch generally provide a fairly "one size fits standard bikes" parking solution -...
- Steve K 3 hours 56 min ago
I'm there now too, if anyone wants a follow/wants to follow me. @cyclingtheseaso
- Shepton 4 hours 32 min ago
I totally agree. I used to commute through Long Ashton and only started getting agro from motorists when the pavement was made to be a shared path....
- Rendel Harris 5 hours 6 min ago
It's obviously a very personal thing but if I was in the market at your budget I would take a serious look at the Ribble AllRoad SL Pro, currently...
Add new comment
13 comments
Given the sentences they dish out to motorists what are going to do. Pay them?
Did they endanger anyone else? No, so is the continued legal action against them worth the resources it is taking? Especially when drivers get away with killing cyclists and not being prosecuted?
Sorry, the ? key on my keyboard is stuck?
Almost feel like I'm the only one who agrees with them getting charged....
At the end of the day, they got caught breaking the law. What they did was *hilariously* stupid. I do also agree that the charge for driving offences is usually pathetic, but that's a diffirent story.
I don't see any need for cyclists to be banned from the tunnel though.
I think it's a waste of time charging them even if they can prove "incapable of having proper control of the cycle". A simple warning from Mr Plod would surely do the trick and I doubt they're going to do it again. I personally don't want to see tax money wasted on this non-issue and a cycle-ban doesn't seem a proportional response either.
Proving it is not hard. Under the influence does not mean over a certain limit. It means "under the influence of drink or a drug to such an extent as to be incapable of having proper control of the cycle". You simply look at how they were acting and decide based on that.
Given that one of then apparently said it was stupid and dangerous and wouldn't have happened if they'd been sober, proving this offence really isn't going to be a problem.
What a fantastic use of time & funds...
So how did the driver of the car legally take that photo then?
Click through to the Liverpool Echo article with the video - it's been filmed by the front seat passenger in the car.
Unless they breathalysed them, how would they prove it?
That would prove nothing anyway, 2 pints is not drunk - it's only above the DD limit. It is not the same thing.
1 month cycling ban, that'll show 'em.
Good luck with that - it has been successfully argued in the past that it is not possible to cycle when drunk. And of course, there is no breath test allowed either.
Some years ago while riding a bike in Cambridge, I was run down from behind by a motorist (who left the scene). When the police arrived, I was given a breathlyser test. Maybe the policeman was overkeen!