The Metropolitan Police are coming under pressure to trial an award-winning close pass initiative similar to one successfully introduced in the West Midlands this year.
The Give Space, be Safe operation, run by West Midlands Police, was introduced to tackle cycling collisions, as well as fear of traffic among those who would like to cycle but don't. Within a few weeks, over nine deployments, officers have spoken to 130 drivers, and say driver behaviour appears to have improved beyond the target area.
Road safety campaigners and police officers at the House of Lords last week questioned why the Metropolitan Police (Met) have not replicated the close pass initiative in London, dismissing claims London traffic is too slow-moving to run the operation. A Camden-based Sergeant was among those who have run successful similar close pass operations.
West Midlands Police: If poor driving makes people too scared to cycle, it's a police matter
Caroline Russell, Green London Assembly Member, asked officers from West Midlands Police on Tuesday: “It is wonderful to have police who take this so seriously and I wonder if you have any advice about how we can get the Met to take on the thinking and the way of acting that you have and also the priority?”
London Cycling Campaign Vice Chair, Terry Patterson, asked whether the Met and the City of London will “commit to reversing the trend of de-prioritising traffic policing”.
She said: “We note that the City of London police could make a start around their educational work, working with ourselves and the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association (LTDA) around lowering the risk of collision, which is their stated aim, so I really do think this is something we should be working towards with both the Met and the City of London police.”
Met reveals it tried the operation - but says London too congested
Sergeant Simon Castle, of the Metropolitan Police’s Cycle Safety Team, revealed on Tuesday the Met has tried the close pass operation, but in the areas his team is deployed to – locations where the most collisions occur, in Central London – traffic was too slow moving.
He said: “The only people that passed us were other cyclists. It will come as no surprise to most of us, the cycle is the fastest vehicle; we weren’t getting overtaken.”
However, he added, it may be possible to target other areas outside of Central London, where traffic is faster-moving, as part of a monthly “tasking week”.
He said: “What we’re going to do is have another go in plain clothes, but we might choose somewhere a little less, as you say, dense.” Castle cited Bexley as somewhere with a “depressingly low number of cyclists” which could be tackled.
The Road Danger Reduction Forum’s Chair, Dr Robert Davis, said: “I went on patrol with Sergeant Castle and the cycle safety team and most of the work is done in central and inner London but we have a problem that cycling hasn’t really grown in outer London - it is perceived as more hazardous because you have the higher speeds and you don’t have the safety in numbers effect because you don’t have the numbers of cyclists. Even if there aren’t that many cyclists, we would hope there could be a replication of that.”
Drivers in North London borough caught close passing a cyclist twice in a year could have their car crushed
Camden Sergeant says close pass operations can work in London
Sgt Nick Clarke, the Police Sergeant for Camden Town and Primrose Hill Ward, who already adopted the close pass operation under his own initiative with no additional funding, after hearing about the West Midlands operation, told road.cc last week he feels it can have wide-reaching effects on driver behaviour across London.
He said: “It can be replicated in London, it’s just [about] the locations that you choose.”
He said while High Holborn, for example, has a high KSI rate (killed or seriously injured) it isn’t possible to run a close pass operation there. However, he said, if you target roads running into High Holborn drivers start looking out for cyclists when they reach those dangerous junctions.
“They get to the point where there’s someone on a Boris Bike on High Holborn who’s at risk of collision; by targeting them three or four miles up the road you’re reducing the risk of that happening,” he said.
Close-pass footage has now been used to prosecute 78 drivers, say West Midlands police
No reason why Give Space, be Safe can't be rolled out across the country, say officers
Cycling UK’s Duncan Dollimore asked West Midlands Police officers if there are any reasons the scheme cannot be rolled out across the entire country. He said: “I note the occasional comment that yes ‘WMP are doing this on a busy a road’, ‘it’s a straight road’, ‘its’ different where we are’, the suggestion that in different parts of the country perhaps it might not be appropriate to operate.
“If we just discount the very centre of London for a minute and accept that is slightly different beast as it were, is there any reason you can think of why the scheme you operated can’t be rolled out round most of the rest of the country?”
PC Steve Hudson, an officer behind Give Space, be Safe, said: “I don’t think it matters where it is, I think you just need the will of the officers, and perhaps their supervisors.
“None of this is particularly difficult - if it was it wouldn’t have gotten off the ground.”
He said: “You can upscale or downscale this as much as you like. For example the minimalist approach, you put one officer out on a bike with a camera on, ride them round anywhere, if the offence is committed, they go back to the station, download the footage, send a Notice of Intended Prosecution out in the post and that’s the operation at its smallest level.
“You don’t need anything else. You have a massive social media campaign and local media campaign, saying: officer out in plain clothes, pass too close and you’re going to get the Notice of Intended Prosecution (NIP). All your drivers are looking at cyclists on the road thinking is that a police officer, I’d better go round him properly just in case, and that’s all you need to do.”
Met says road safety a priority
An MPS spokesperson said: “Road safety is a priority for the Met.
“The MPS continually reviews its roads policing operations and activity to help keep London's road network as safe as possible.
“The Met’s Roads and Transport Policing Command, in partnership with Transport for London, has full time cycle patrols to improve cycle safety and prevent cyclists being killed or seriously injured across London. It now has 33 full-time officers, including ten PCSOs. Activity is based around three key themes of Engineering (designing out risk), Education (increasing awareness amongst all London's road users of key sources of danger and risk), and where appropriate Enforcement.
“The Cycle Safety Team reduces cycle casualties by conducting enforcement patrols on bicycle to address poor behaviour by all types of road user who place cyclists in danger. They are deployed to casualty hotspots which are identified through regular analysis. Enforcement activity includes all classes of road user and targets the offences and locations of greatest risk to cyclists. This includes close passing, something all the officers have been trained in.
“The team also delivers the award-winning 'Exchanging Places' programme, which gives vulnerable road users the opportunity to sit in the driver's seat of a lorry and discuss safe tactics for sharing the road with large vehicles. They also assist with a number of engineering projects, from cycle detection technology for lorries to innovative road layout designs.”
Add new comment
15 comments
The Met has no excuse - in my end of town, Chiswick High Road and High Street Kensington already spring to mind of close passing. Anywhere near a school is a good place to catch close passers. Even just saying they will start taking in public camera footage is light on resources. Even then what's stopping the boroughs from taking the initiative up like Camden has instead of towing the Met line?
Biggest close passing problem in central London is drivers trying to pass everyone in the ASL before they get to the other side of the junction. This should be easy to police - just station foot police there and at the next set of lights along.
“The only people that passed us were other cyclists. It will come as no surprise to most of us, the cycle is the fastest vehicle; we weren’t getting overtaken.”
Suggests the point is spectacularly missed. Its about poor observation and lack of consideration rather than specifically close passes. This is entirely independent of speed.
The thing they need to focus on in London would appear to be left hooking, particularly by construction lorries.
I think (hope) that a lot of police forces have been shown up and embarrassed by the WMP scheme. Suddenly they can't in all honesty say that they can't do the same due to budgetary or staffing pressures. So it looks like they're going to come up with more creative excuses.
I only very occasionally ride in London. I'm interested as to how they went faster than the vehicles, my experience is I am quicker overall but get close passed between lights by muppets including the roads mentioned , High Holborn and down into the city.
cars accelerate so much quicker. No excuse whatso ever.
in fact why not replace the laser light cycle diagram lights on the boris bikes with wifi enabled cameras and have a desk sergeant just send out fixed penalty notices in real time?
plus parliament could help, make the fines big enough to pay for enforcement. We should view bad driving as a revenue opportunity, I have never understood the argument about councils just making money with cameras on yellow boxed intersections for instance. Break the rules/law, expect to pay if caught!
It is utterly erroneous to claim that there is nowhere in the Met's area that is suitable for plain clothes enforcement of passing space. Sure, the rush hour in zone 1 might not be the most appropriate (although even there I can think of plenty of places where there are both lots of cyclists and lots of pisspoor driving), but the Met covers the whole of Greater London 24 hours a day.
All that is missing is the will to prevent bad driving.
FTA
Seeing as I cycle daily in zone 1: Yes, overall the bike is faster, but that doesn't stop people in cars dangerously overtaking. Because getting to the next red light quicker is so important.
That said, I generally feel less worried about dangerous overtakes in central London than out in the countryside. The speeds are so much lower, and (I think) drivers know you'll catch up with them and .. err.. offer words of advice at the next light
I get close-passed in The Regent's Park every day. Given that motoring speeds of 84 mph have been recorded in the park, it seems a reasonable bet some of this driving is against the law.
It would also be a rather nice beat for the officers assigned; what's not to like?
The Met could also look at YouTube videos by the likes of cyclegaz, thefireuk, etc to determine where there were bad driving hotspots (clue the whole of CS7). Otherwise, a few runs between Roehampton and Tolworth on the A3 should nab some miscreants
They should give the diplomatic protection officers that always hang around there a speed gun to go with their already extensive collection of armoury.
I kind of a agree that centre London might not benefit for this in the same way.
I my part of the country, Hampshire, the local police have time to stop hundreds of cyclist doing nothing wrong but no time to do anything like this or stop the carnage of drivers on their mobile phones. Hampshire seams to be something of a hotspot killer motorist with mobile phones, something which I'm sure the Hampshire police are extremely proud of.
Nonsense, average speeds are no barrier to the numpty who likes to overtake unnecessarily close and at high speed only to slam on the brakes moments later at the next red light or traffic jam, happens constantly.
"high speeds" and "centr[al] London" are not normally seen together - but I know what you mean..
This is a brilliant initiative and Sgt Nick Clarke has to be up for every road safety award going.
The reasons given by other police forces for not implementing it in their area are exactly the same as we're given every time that some useful cycling infrastructure is proposed "Sure it works over there, but it wouldn't work here." Why are people so negative and unwilling to try something new?
I suspect the main reason that the Met don't want to do this is because they wouldn't be able to process the paperwork fast enough with the thousands of offenders.