- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Swiss Cottage proposals (TfL artist's impression).jpgLondon mayor Sadiq Khan unveils fresh CS11 plans - but Andrew Gilligan slams them as "a dog's dinner"
Mayor of London Sadiq Khan says that work on Cycle Superhighway (CS) 11 from Swiss Cottage to the West End will begin next year, to the disappointment of opponents of the scheme. However, London’s former cycling commissioner, Andrew Gilligan, says the mayor risks creating “a dog’s dinner of a scheme” by not closing Regent’s Park to through traffic.
But in what is becoming an increasingly bitter war of words between Khan and his predecessor Boris Johnson’s cycling commissioner, the mayor accused the previous administration of leaving the plans for the route “in an absolute mess” and had left “the community divided.”
Khan said: “We’ve worked hard to listen to the concerns raised and taken these into account, while still delivering significant improvements for pedestrians and cyclists.
“We will also be working with the Royal Parks to see what further improvements could be made in Regent’s Park to make a real difference to safety for everyone, at all times of the day.
“Together such improvements will make cycling safer and easier for all Londoners in the area, helping to make cycling a part of their everyday lives.”
This morning’s announcement is accompanied by Transport for London’s publication of its response to a consultation that closed earlier this year.
> Respondents to CS11 consultation back plans by two to one
It confirms that the Swiss Cottage gyratory, and intimidating junction for cyclists and pedestrians, will be removed, with some tweaks to the original plans, including a wider segregated cycle lane on Avenue Road and changes to minimise traffic being displaced onto nearby residential roads.
Discussions will continue with The Royal Parks about the final form of the section of CS11 that passes through Regent’s Park will take, with City Hall saying that “while closing fur of the eight perimeter gates to reduce through traffic at the busiest times of day remains the default position, consideration will be given to other options to make the park safer for everyone, at all times of the day.”
Final plans for Regent’s Park will be unveiled next summer, with one proposal being that the speed limit within the park be reduced to 20mph.
But Gilligan, a fierce critic of Khan’s plans for cycling since he replaced Boris Johnson as mayor in May, said on his blog that “the refusal to commit” to closing those four gates, and thereby make it much more difficult for drivers to use the park as a rat run, “is a pretty bad sign.”
He said: “Any decision not to close the gates at Regent’s Park, in response to the shrill falsehoods of a nimby minority, would be an act of defining weakness which would effectively end any serious cycling and walking programme in this mayoral term.
“If Sadiq cannot even close four of the eight gates to a park, part of a proposal with 60 per cent support, it is difficult to imagine him doing the much harder things which await – such as constructing segregated tracks on busy arterial roads.”
Gilligan also criticised Westminster City Council, which in October was accused of ignoring cyclists’ concerns over safety in its proposals to remodel Baker Street after it claimed its plans were supported by respondents to a consultation.
That support, however, was only achieved once responses from cyclists had been excluded.
> Westminster City Council "ignoring cycle safety concerns"
Gilligan wrote: “The deeply troubling role of Westminster City Council in this saga should also be recorded. They opposed the [Regent’s Park] gate closure on the grounds, among others, that it would jeopardise their scheme for two-way traffic in Baker Street.
“But Baker Street is a worthless and deeply disliked scheme, with few supporters and few discernible benefits for anyone, not just cyclists,” he said. “It is opposed by many of the retailers it was supposed to benefit.”
London Cycling Campaign welcomed the news about CS11, however. Chief executive Asjok Sinha said: “CS11 will be another vital addition to London’s cycling routes, and it’s great news that its construction will finally begin next year.
“Increasing numbers of Londoners are attracted to the convenience of cycling and CS11 will help make it safer for them to do so. LCC particularly welcomes the long overdue redevelopment of the dangerous Swiss Cottage gyratory and the Mayor and Royal Parks’ commitment to ensuring the safety for people walking and cycling through Regent’s Park.”
Today’s announcement received a frostier reception from opponents of the scheme, whose concerns included that the construction of CS11 would result in greater traffic congestion in areas such as Hampstead.
A tweet from the Stop CS11 account on Twitter referenced councillor Phil Jones, the London Borough of Camden’s cabinet member for regeneration, transport and planning.
It said: “We are extremely disappointed in meaningless tweaks @TfL have made to #CS11. @philjones79 you are condemning Camden residents to congestion.”
> London Cycling Campaign appeals for funds to halt 'NIMBYs and taxi drivers' spoiling cycle schemes
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- froze 4 hours 15 min ago
Just my opinion, but sorry that bike is UGLY! I can't see that sort of price for a completed bike, not alone for just the frame and fork!...
- Boopop 4 hours 53 min ago
I find it deeply jarring and disappointing that Sir David agrees with these people not wanting a cycle lane. Whenever I watch one of his excellent...
- chrisonabike 5 hours 2 min ago
May need insurance, tax and a licence. No problem with the lights though.
- Simon E 5 hours 18 min ago
Yes, they look just like the Lezyne Zecto model. My club bought a couple of sets from the LBS for our midweek TTs so if someone turns up without...
- Hirsute 7 hours 49 min ago
If you can't see a %^$&ing large tractor what ^%$£"!*ing hope is there that you will see a cyclist ?...
- chrisonabike 8 hours 7 min ago
Well if you *can* interview the original riders at all surely they worked, at least?...
- David9694 8 hours 36 min ago
Live: Car plunges over wall and lands on beach rocks...
- biking59boomer 8 hours 42 min ago
Looks like yet another bike share service that's going to fold because of selfish idiots.
- brooksby 13 hours 49 min ago
And finally: I wonder how many of the "more than 3,000" signatures on that petition are actually locals, who live or work there (and are not just...
Add new comment
10 comments
Thank you Fifth Gear, from now on Muckabites, NIMBY never did quite cut it.
Give him a little time, I know we've been waiting, but at least he's not Goldsmith.
The people who live on the closed former rat run streets will tell their NIMBY friends how much nicer it is, that even though it might take a few more minutes to drive to the school, the've now started to walk as it's not bumper to bumper traffic, that it's so much more pleasant, that they now shop locally, at that lovely little bakery and that deli. That their house prices have gone up more.
The shopkeepers who thought it was the end of the world will find that footfall, business and profits are up, because everything is nicer, and people are walking there, and cycling. And not driving so much to the big malls and hypermarkets where the parking is free and easy, because they never really liked driving to the high street where parking costs or you have to drive around for ages looking for a free spot. Because if theres one thing drivers hate is paying for parking.
But were not Amsterdam they will say, but I'm talking New York. The ultimate capitalist metropolis.
Of course those that have to drive into London will always be dissapointed, screw 'em. It isn't like it's perfect right now.
Khan is a bare-faced lier. His attitude to cycling so far has confirmed the fact he couldn't give a damn about cycling or cyclists. Anyone else who cares about cycling who voted for him should be utterly ashamed of themselves.
This.
'Though at least he's not Goldsmith.' seconded.
It was plain that neither Tory or Labour candidate gave a damn about cycling.
Johnson did bugger all for 6 1/2 years remember. The segregated tracks only arrived in the last 18 months - after all else had failed.
Coulde doo with a byt of proofe reeedin'.
"@philjones79 you are condemning Camden residents to congestion"
Because at the moment they have the true freedom of the open road, just like in the adverts.
Even the generally anti cyclist idiots on top gear came to the conclusion that more people on bikes meant less people driving cars. If you build it, they will come.
Don't I remeber recent survey of that area that showed residents in favour ? Is not the truth those against come from outside these areas and the poor dears don't care a jot for the pollution etc that true residents have to put up with because of cars etc.
There's no reasoning with this shower I'm afraid.
Utter pre-trump, post-truth shite from the marching band of hampstead pro-rat-runners, pro-deprivation of mobility for children, parents and grand-parents.
They claimed that CS11 would cause rat-running (after hearing this phrase shouted at one of their meetings at them) - and pervertedly used it to demand their right to continue doing just that.
(they also ignored the actual FACT that TfL suggested there and then that they would work with Camden to mitigate issues of displaced traffic).
The pro-pollution brigade also complained about a broad geographcal range of respondents voting for the scheme, yet hypocritically kept silent about the fact that their own mob of over-privileged delinquents were sending their votes from overseas amongst other places.
But the worst of it is, that Sadiq and TfL for some bizarre reason unbeknown to the rest of us, has, despite the very fact of overwhelming support for CS11, felt the need to ignore the needs of the public for breathable air, for that majprity of adults and children denied their easy, low cost form of regular exercise (150 minutes pw recommended by TfL's own health officials), etc et bloody cetera...they have decided to listen to the people that bullied and hectored the TfL speakers at meetings.
These are the people that demand their right to speed through a park FFS. But do so by painting the CS11 suppoters as the ones who (will) cause pollution and rat-running.
How has this been allowed to happen?