Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

news

Which hugely popular small car is more polluting than a fully laden lorry?

TfL's testing reveals shocking state of cars sold in Britain...

One of the most popular small cars in Britain is as polluting as a fully laden lorry, test data has shown.

The VW Polo newest diesel edition emits as much as much toxic nitrogen dioxide (NO2) as an HGV with cargo.

“The worst-performing car [in the tests] was a VW Polo with a 1.4-litre turbodiesel engine with NO2 emissions 13 times higher than EU regulations allow,” James Tate of Leeds University’s Institute for Transport Studies, who analysed the test results, told the Sunday Times.

“Its emissions of 1.2 grams of NO2 per kilometre were the same as a fully laden diesel truck with a 13-litre engine that we also tested.”

Transport for London commissioned Millbrook, a vehicle testing firm in Bedfordshire, to drive the vehicles on a London route at night, during rush hour and at midday. The routes and vehicle acceleration and deceleration were recorded and replicated in test conditions.

13 cars and four lorries were tested.

“The key finding was that small diesel cars emitted far more pollution than larger cars and even lorries,” said Tate.

Other high polluters included a Vauxhall Astra, Ford Focus and BMW 318d.

“On average, the diesel cars tested emitted as much NO2 as 1,000 petrol-hybrid cars.

“These results also suggest that replacing diesel taxis with petrol-hybrids would be one of the quickest ways to improve city centre air quality,” he said.

Sadiq Khan, the mayor of London, said: “It beggars belief that 18 months after Dieselgate, motorists are still being sold vehicles that breach emission standards on the streets.”

As we reported last month, Mr Khan has announced the introduction of a £10 ‘T-Charge’ targeting 10,000 of the oldest, most polluting vehicles operating within the capital. The charge will be brought in on October 23 – the start of autumn half-term.

The T-Charge will walk alongside the Congestion Charge and will apply Monday to Friday from 7am to 6pm. The owners of diesel and petrol vehicles manufactured before 2005 that do not meet Euro 4 emissions standards for nitrogen oxide (NO2) and particulates will have to pay.

Mr Khan said: “It’s staggering that we live in a city where the air is so toxic that many of our children are growing up with lung problems. If we don’t make drastic changes now we won’t be protecting the health of our families in the future.”

He added that he considered the T-Charge a vital step in tackling the dirtiest diesels and said that he planned to introduce the world’s first Ultra Low Emission Zone as early as 2019.

“I will continue to do everything in my power to help protect the health of Londoners and clean our filthy air. But now is the time for Government to show real leadership and join me by introducing a diesel scrappage fund and bring in the new Clean Air Act we desperately need.”

The system will use a camera-based mechanism for enforcement and will monitor both diesel and petrol vehicles.

Leon Daniels, Transport for London’s (TfL) Managing Director of Surface Transport, said: “London’s air quality crisis is one of the biggest challenges we face and we are working alongside the Mayor to address it.

“The T-Charge is a crucial part of this work and will discourage drivers of the oldest, most polluting vehicles from driving in central London. To help drivers we have created an online compliance checker , which can be found on the TfL website, that enables people to easily establish whether they will be affected by the charge.”

The measure is however only expected to lead to a small reduction in toxic fumes.

Conservative London Assembly environment spokesman, Shaun Bailey, told the BBC (link is external) that TfL’s consultation showed the T-Charge would affect just 7 per cent of vehicles entering the Congestion Charge zone.

"Under assessment by his own people, the mayor's flagship air pollution policy is predicted to have only a 'negligible' impact on air quality, reducing poisonous NOx gasses by just 1-3%," Mr Bailey said.

Add new comment

43 comments

Avatar
Grahamd | 7 years ago
3 likes

I thought vehicle excise duty was calculated on emissions, so why aren't such cars simply priced out of being economical with an increase in the duty?

Avatar
Griff500 replied to Grahamd | 7 years ago
5 likes

Grahamd wrote:

I thought vehicle excise duty was calculated on emissions, so why aren't such cars simply priced out of being economical with an increase in the duty?

Excise Duty is based on Carbon Dioxide emissions and do not consider Nitrogen Dioxide. 

Avatar
usedtobefaster replied to Grahamd | 7 years ago
4 likes

Grahamd wrote:

I thought vehicle excise duty was calculated on emissions, so why aren't such cars simply priced out of being economical with an increase in the duty?

 

Isn't VED based on CO2 not NO2 which is the pollutant problem with diesels so increasing VED won't affect people buying diesels as diesels emit less CO2 than the same size petrol engine.

 

The way to tackle diesel purchase is through increasing the benefit in kind valuation of diesels which will affect the buying habits of the company car driver  and I would expect the majority of new diesel cars sold are the corporate market.  (I'm sure there's some stat somewhere that shows the proportion of new car sales)

 

 

Avatar
cyclisto | 7 years ago
2 likes

Very interesting, but we all cyclists always knew that before dieselgate. Just pedal at the back of a diesel engined car and your lungs will turn black!

Is there any other link, as ST article requires registration?

Avatar
Yorkshire wallet | 7 years ago
4 likes

Annoying the way the diesel was pushed onto the public with nice tax exemptions when in fact it's polluting shite. 

Anyway, now they can be demonised so the car industry can push us onto hybrids,electrics and small petrol turbo engines. Got to keep that car industry going. 

 

Avatar
barbarus | 7 years ago
7 likes

Not just on the road, but in the showroom waiting to be sold new! Crazy.

Avatar
tourdelound | 7 years ago
9 likes

“The worst-performing car [in the tests] was a VW Polo with a 1.4-litre turbodiesel engine with NO2 emissions 13 times higher than EU regulations allow,” James Tate of Leeds University’s Institute for Transport Studies, who analysed the test results, told the Sunday Times(link is external).

 

Why are these vehicles and any others, breaking the EU regulations, still on the road?  no

Avatar
Accessibility f... replied to tourdelound | 7 years ago
7 likes

tourdelound wrote:

Why are these vehicles and any others, breaking the EU regulations, still on the road?  no

 

Because they're not breaking regulations.  They pass the laboratory tests, which do not reflect real-world driving conditions.  But out on the road is a different matter.  That's why the oft-quoted manufacturer mpg claims are almost never achieveable in the real world.

Avatar
bendertherobot replied to Accessibility for all | 7 years ago
0 likes

Peowpeowpeowlasers wrote:

tourdelound wrote:

Why are these vehicles and any others, breaking the EU regulations, still on the road?  no

 

Because they're not breaking regulations.  They pass the laboratory tests, which do not reflect real-world driving conditions.  But out on the road is a different matter.  That's why the oft-quoted manufacturer mpg claims are almost never achieveable in the real world.

 

And, to add, the failing VW's probably STILL met EU regs even without the cheat, at least in the lab......

Avatar
CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
5 likes

Bloody VW, have they paid compensation to UK/EU drivers and those affected by high pollution?

Avatar
SingleSpeed replied to CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
0 likes

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Bloody VW, have they paid compensation to UK/EU drivers and those affected by high pollution?

 

Yeah Bloody VW you should of seen the massive plume of black smoke chugging out of the back of my 20 year old T4 Van this morning, well at least she's got another 20 years in her yet.

Avatar
Richard D replied to CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
2 likes

CXR94Di2 wrote:

Bloody VW, have they paid compensation to UK/EU drivers and those affected by high pollution?

 

I'd be more impressed if the compensation was instead paid to those suffering - or likely to suffer from - respiratory disease as a result of exposure to this pollution.

 

thoug I believe that the yank government got the first blow in, and made sure their coffers were topped up by fines from VW.  Somehow, I don't see a German-dominated EU doing the same.

 

though as has already been said, it beggars belief that such polluting vehicles are still sold, and that the VED scheme does nothing to target them.  

Avatar
Kim replied to CXR94Di2 | 7 years ago
2 likes
CXR94Di2 wrote:

Bloody VW, have they paid compensation to UK/EU drivers and those affected by high pollution?

Not as far as I am aware, but then just look at who has really been harmed...

Pages

Latest Comments