- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Christianshavn and bicycles (picture Ursula Bach for Copenhagen City Council).jpgHalf of Danes say cycle helmets should be mandatory, new survey finds
Half the population of Denmark, the country that has some of the highest levels of cycling worldwide, think that it should be compulsory for people to wear a helmet when riding a bike, reports a new poll.
Opponents of mandatory helmet laws often point out that in countries with high levels of cycling such as the Netherlands and Denmark, everyday riders are seldom seen sporting a helmet.
But according to a survey carried out by Analyse Danmark on behalf of Avisen.dk, 49 per cent of the 1,040 people polled in what is said to be a representative sample of the country’s population say that cyclists should be required by law to wear one.
A further 23 per cent said that they should be compulsory just for children and adolescents, while the remaining 28 per cent said helmets should not be mandatory at all.
While the Danish government and the country’s road safety council and national cyclists’ federation all oppose compulsion, traffic researcher Harry Lahrmann of Aalborg University is in favour.
He told Avisen.dk: “We’ve long become used to wearing a seatbelt when getting into a car, and with a little getting used to it, using a helmet would likewise become part of the cycling routine.”
Klaus Bondam, director of the Danish Cyclists’ Federation said: “We strongly recommend that you wear a helmet. But we don’t think it makes sense to make it mandatory to wear one.”
However, he added that the organisation’s own campaigning efforts were leading to an increase in the use of cycle helmets in Denmark, including among children – although a challenge remains in converting teenagers.
“But at a time when fewer and fewer children and youths are riding to school, we do not recommend making it mandatory to use helmets. At worst it will get more people to give up cycling.”
Villum Christensen, an MP for the Liberal Alliance party which forms part of Denmark’s ruling coalition and who is its spokesman for road safety, told Avisen.dk: “Citizens should have free choice over whether or not to use a helmet.”
He added: “We are not in favour of legislating every time there is a problem.”
In 2009, a bid to make it compulsory for children aged under 12 in Denmark to wear a helmet when riding a bike was defeated in the Danish Parliament.
> Danish call for helmet law thrown out
Nevertheless, as elsewhere, the issue remains a divisive one, as explained in this blog post by Mikael Colville-Andersen, CEO of the Copenhagenize Design Co., after he took part in a panel discussion for the country’s national radio station in January.
In 2014, British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman told road.cc: "I think the helmet issue is a massive red herring. It’s not even in the top 10 of things you need to do to keep cycling safe or more widely, save the most lives.
“It’s a bit like saying ‘people are sniping at you going down this street, so put some body armour on.
“Once you see somebody wearing body armour, even if there’s no shooting," he added, "you think ‘Christ I’m not going down there if they’re wearing body armour to go down that street.’
"It scares people off.”
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- Pub bike 4 sec ago
The owners of the private car park made reasonable attempts to contact Lime and ask them to remove the bikes that were fly-tipped on their property...
- Pub bike 5 min 21 sec ago
Could be for cyclists with congenitally long arms.
- mark1a 5 hours 47 min ago
I'll put you down as a no then.
- Boopop 7 hours 59 min ago
I find it deeply jarring and disappointing that Sir David agrees with these people not wanting a cycle lane. Whenever I watch one of his excellent...
- chrisonabike 8 hours 8 min ago
May need insurance, tax and a licence. No problem with the lights though.
- Hirsute 10 hours 55 min ago
If you can't see a %^$&ing large tractor what ^%$£"!*ing hope is there that you will see a cyclist ?...
- chrisonabike 11 hours 13 min ago
Well if you *can* interview the original riders at all surely they worked, at least?...
- David9694 11 hours 42 min ago
Live: Car plunges over wall and lands on beach rocks...
- brooksby 16 hours 55 min ago
And finally: I wonder how many of the "more than 3,000" signatures on that petition are actually locals, who live or work there (and are not just...
Add new comment
14 comments
This is pretty shoddy journalism Road.cc.
As due diligence, you should at least post the questions asked by the poll.
considering they're talking out their arses, you'd expect a figure of 50%
We really need to stop asking questions that half the people asked will be directly affected by, but the other half don't feel they have any stake in personally, other than a vague feeling of reassurance (that if the run over someone that a foam hat will prevent them from being a murderer, or that the shape of bananas will be preserved), and the chance to take revenge on the first half (for making them feel guilty for polluting the planet, or for being educated and cosmopolitan.)
Go Denmark!
I guess the large majority of the 1040 people polled are not bike riders or maybe the photo isn't a true representation of the poll results as only 3 of the 21 bike riders pictured are wearing a helmet
They do love their helmets
CyclingDane.jpg
Is it one of the surveys like OnePoll when you tell them what results you want to get out of it and then they help you "tailor" the questions?
P.S. It's true.
I see helmets are useless for skiing as well as riding a bike...
The average skier death in CO is a thirty-seven years old experienced male skier wearing a helmet who loses control on an intermediate, groomed run and hits a tree.
The majority of deaths — 54 percent — occurred on blue, groomed runs, while 31 percent were on expert trails.
The increase in the number of people who wear helmets hasn’t resulted in fewer fatalities. Helmets are designed to protect riders at about 12 mph, while a skier or snowboarder who collides with a tree or another rider is typically going 25 to 40 mph.
More than 80 percent of ski deaths in Colorado are men.
39 skiers and snowboarders perished at US ski areas during the 2015-16 season. That falls inline with the 10-year industry average of 38 fatalities per season.
Researchers at Johns Hopkins recently estimated that about 600,000 people nationally are injured each year as a result of skiing and snowboarding.
Estimates are that about two injuries occur per 1,000 skier visits — a decrease of 50 percent since the mid-1970s.
http://unofficialnetworks.com/2017/03/7-surprising-facts-ski-deaths-inju...
whilst I do not believe cycle helmets should be compulsory (although I almost always wear one) I do not think fake news about skiing helmets helps. Link to the real Johns Hopkins research is below
http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/helmets_save_lives_of_skiers_and_snowboarders
A 2012 link to the real John Hopkins research which is contradicted by this 2013 link to the real New York Times article which cites a 2012 paper from the real Western Michigan University School of Medicine and a March 2013 study by the real University of Washington. Both of which have found head injuries have increased along with the increase in helmet use.
https://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/sports/on-slopes-rise-in-helmet-use-b...
In fact, some studies indicate that the number of snow-sports-related head injuries has increased. A 2012 study at the Western Michigan University School of Medicine on head injuries among skiers and snowboarders in the United States found that the number of head injuries increased 60 percent in a seven-year period, from 9,308 in 2004 to 14,947 in 2010, even as helmet use increased by an almost identical percentage over the same period. A March 2013 study by the University of Washington concluded that the number of snow-sports-related head injuries among youths and adolescents increased 250 percent from 1996 to 2010.
The Danes have got form for this sort of thing.
https://www.outfit4events.com/runtime/cache/images/productFull/bis_3054.JPG
It sounds like the Danish legislators are of a similar libertarian bent as British/English Common law. If it isn't explicitly detrimental there is no need to intervene. I wonder why these surveys and statements from local councillors keep getting publicity when the status quo is already ideal.
I would really love to see what the questions were on this survey. As anyone who has done a survery knows, if you ask the right questions you get the answers you wanted.
Did the questions say:
"This doesn't reduce risk to cyclists and has never worked anywhere it has been tried and has massive unintended consequences, so do you think we should have compulsory helmets here?"
or was it more like:
"Hundreds of cyclists die every year and helmets can save lives, so should we have a helmet law here?"
Call me cynical, but if this really was a representative sample, how come so few Danish cyclists wear helmets?
They'll be the half of Denmark's population who don't cycle then?