Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Team Sky and British Cycling had no 'medicines management policy' admits Wiggins 'Jiffy Bag' doctor

Select committee says ‘major questions’ remain for Sky and British Cycling after Dr Richard Freeman gives written evidence

 

The doctor involved in the controversy over a mystery package containing medicine for Sir Bradley Wiggins at the 2011 Criterium du Dauphiné has confessed that neither Team Sky nor British Cycling kept written records relating to their stock of medicines at the time. The chair of a House of Commons select 

Richard Freeman had been due to appear before the House of Commons Select Committee for Culture, Media and Sport earlier this month as part of its investigation into doping in sport, but pulled out at the eleventh hour, citing illness.

In a letter published today by the select committee, he puts his version of events in which he highlights the absence at the time of a written procedure to keep track of medicines given to riders and expresses his “regret” at failing to back up his own records.

In his letter, he wrote: “In 2011 neither [Team Sky nor British Cycling] had a written medicines-management policy or stock-taking system. This was not uncommon practice in sports teams at that time.

“In early 2012 Dr Steve Peters [then head of medicine at Team Sky] and I introduced a basic stock-control review of the medicines ordered for British Cycling. This has evolved into a written medicine-management policy.”

At the time of the 2011 Dauphiné, when former British Cycling women’s road team manager Simon Cope delivered a package claimed to include the decongestant Fluimucil, which is not banned, administration of medicines was logged against individual riders’ own medical records.

He said: “This included not just the name of the medicine but the dose recommendations, the amount and the batch number, to minimise the risk of medicines containing prohibited substances being acquired by a rider.”

However, Freeman did not back up records for Wiggins to the cloud-based system Team Sky employed, and said his laptop was subsequently stolen while holidaying in Greece.

“I accept that it would have been desirable to have backed up my clinical records, whatever system was used. I regret not doing this,” he wrote, pointing out that “travelling with a team is a very different environment from sitting in a GP surgery.”

The doctor highlighted that “It was very important to be sure that any medicines sent to the team on tour were appropriate and from a reliable source.”

In recent weeks, it has transpired that Freeman had previously bought Fluimucil from pharmacies in Germany and Switzerland – the latter location a three-hour drive from where the French race was held in June 2011.

> “There will not be a whistleblower” at Team Sky insists Brailsford as letter to MPs about Dauphiné mystery package reveals its doctor bought Fluimucil in Switzerland

But he said: “During the Dauphine in June 2011, we were running low on Fluimucil. My first thought was of the supply I had in Manchester, and that the team would be able to access that supply quickly.

“It did not occur to me to travel to Switzerland. Only Fluimucil was contained in the package sent.”

Freeman also spoke about the issue of Therapeutic Use Exemptions (TUEs), which allow athletes to take drugs which would otherwise be banned if they have a genuine medical need.

Records released by computer hackers after last summer’s Rio Olympics show that Wiggins took the controversial drug triamcinolone before the Tour de France in 2011 and 2012, and the Giro d’Italia in 2013, to treat hay fever and grass and pollen allergies.

Earlier this month, it was claimed that some of Team Sky’s medical staff had taken steps including changing computer passwords to prevent Freeman issuing a fourth TUE for triamcinolone prior to the 2013 Tour of Britain.

> Team Sky doctors 'tried to thwart Wiggins TUE use'

In his letter to the select committee, Freeman said that he was “aware of only a handful of riders” at either British Cycling or Team Sky “being referred to hospital for image-guided triamcinolone injection for clinical need, with none needing a TUE.

“My practice has never been compromised by coaches or management ever at Team Sky or British Cycling,” he added.

“I am not, and have not been, concerned that the TUE process is abused by athletes, in relation to my clinical experience and practice.”

The select committee’s chair, Damian Collins, said that the information provided by Freeman raised “major questions outstanding for Team Sky and British Cycling.

He added: “In particular, why were no back-up medical records kept for Bradley Wiggins in 2011, beyond those on Dr Freeman’s laptop computer?

“Why were there not more formal protocols enforced on record-keeping?

“And whose responsibility was it to make sure that Team Sky’s own stated policies were being enforced?”

Freeman said in his letter that the health of the athletes in his care was his principal concern, and that "athletes' health has never been compromised by forcing me to make a recommendation against my will and clinical judgment.

"I have never encountered a winning at all costs attitude in these organisations. Indeed both organisations have indeed allowed me to care for my patients protecting me from the performance demands that exist to win in elite sport."

Wiggins, who retired in December, broke his silence last week on the controversy that has overshadowed the end of his career.

> Wiggins says his side of Jiffy Bag story will “shock a few people”

Appearing on Sky Sport's Saturday morning football show Soccer AM, he said that doping is “the worst thing to be accused of when you're a man of my integrity.

"It's been horrible. But fortunately there's an investigation and I obviously can't say too much because that investigation will run its course and then I'll have my say.

"There's a lot to say, and it's going to shock a few people," he added.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
MamilMan | 7 years ago
1 like

I'm not sure that any rules have been broken so I guess Team Sky must be hung out to dry on moral grounds.

 

I wonder how a certain MP stands 'morally' in making an MP's expenses claim for rent on one london property (on the basis of it being his 2nd home) while still owning another one in London anyway.

 

I wonder how an MP stands 'morally' paying a company £6k for professional services when in fact that company is owned by his wife?

 

 

 

 

Avatar
davel replied to MamilMan | 7 years ago
2 likes
MamilMan wrote:

I'm not sure that any rules have been broken so I guess Team Sky must be hung out to dry on moral grounds.

 

I wonder how a certain MP stands 'morally' in making an MP's expenses claim for rent on one london property (on the basis of it being his 2nd home) while still owning another one in London anyway.

 

I wonder how an MP stands 'morally' paying a company £6k for professional services when in fact that company is owned by his wife?

 

 

 

 

Fuck knows: have you asked over at ParliamentaryRhetoricalQuestions.com?

Round here, folk like to chat more about drug-taking cyclists.

Avatar
Velovoyeur | 7 years ago
2 likes

What is hard to believe here is that a medical professional does not seem to follow any guidelines relating to good practice that are employed in every other doctors surgery and does not see the importance of backing up his laptop for several years. Why would normal procedures not be used whether you are doctor in practice or on a sports team? Data and records are essential when it comes to a patient's treatment so it is logical to assume that copies must be held somewhere. Unless....

As the song goes; there are more questions than answers 

Avatar
Jackson | 7 years ago
0 likes

"In his letter to the select committee, Freeman said that he was “aware of only a handful of riders” at either British Cycling or Team Sky “being referred to hospital for image-guided triamcinolone injection for clinical need, with none needing a TUE."

Right, so that's admission that there's a handful of riders (2? 4? 10?) at Sky and/or Team GB all charging triamcinolone out of competition (hence the no TUE). But no... Chris Froome isn't at the early season races "because they're too easy for him".

Avatar
tritecommentbot | 7 years ago
4 likes

The only thing better than dodgy documentation when it comes to evidence, is missing documentation. One can be examined, the other never can.

 

At any crucial point in all of this, the laptop, the documents - they're either 'stolen', 'missing' or 'never existed'. When it comes to knowledge, instead of lying about what was in it, many parties simply, 'had no idea'.

 

This is smart lawyering. Don't lie if it can be helped, just say you either don't know, or don't remember. 

 

Even the most ingenius paper trail can't hold up to forensic accounting. Best to shred shit up.

 

Remember at the start, no-one knew what was in the package. They then tested the waters with Fluimicil, no-one would back that up until later when the investigation wasn't able to dig up anything, then they went with it, in a written statement, and filled in the gaps restrspectively - the gaps that the investigation dug up. So smart. 

 

Anyone that doesn't see that needs to work on their analytical skills. I'm actually really impressed with SKY's legal team.

Avatar
HowardR | 7 years ago
0 likes

I'm not attempting to play Devils Advocate - just adding in my 'professional' experience of the world of 'medicines management'.

One would hope that it would be an area that was universally treated with considerable care. Sadly this isn't always the case & often a organization that seems to be 'gold plated' on the outside sits somewhere between 'depressingly' and 'worryingly' on the Slackness spectrum.

You'd have hoped that an organization that seemingly prides its self on it's attitude to marginal gains would be shit hot on knowing who took what when, what was where and when what was due to pass it's expiry date e.t.c -  However, doing such requires an attention to mundane detail that isn't 'sexy' and thus can easily be allowed to slip by those whose egos drag them to more 'important' things.

More a case of lazy crap cock up than conspiracy 'cos if they were doing conspiracy then all the gaps would have been seamlessly papered over - Unless of course........ it's a double bluff?

Latest Comments