Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

West London church urges parishioners to pray against Cycle Superhighway

Chiswick's Church of Our Lady of Grace & St Edward takes a "Not In My Back Churchyard" stance...

A church in West London is urging parishioners to pray against a proposed Cycle Superhighway.

Transport for London (TfL) is currently consulting on its plans, unveiled last month, for Cycle Superhighway 9 from Kensington Olympia to Brentford, with a future extension to Hounslow.

> Plans for new West London Cycle Superhighway unveiled - but there's a missing link through Kensington

The two-way, segregated route would run along Chiswick High Road and past the Catholic Church of Our Lady of Grace & St Edward (the red brick building obscured by trees to the right of centre in this artist's impression).

CS9 Chiswick High Road

The call to prayer was spotted by Twitter user Darren Moore.

On its website, the parish claims that “the pavement outside of the church will be reduced to about one third of its current size and the Cycle Superhighway would have right of way.”

It asks parishioners to consider the effect it would have on:

Sunday Mass congregations gathering on the pavement, the elderly, and families with children vs speeding cyclists

Funerals: no right of way for carrying the coffin

No right of way for First Holy Communion & other processions

Weddings: no right of way for Brides in their wedding dresses.

However, a map provided by TfL as part of its consultation reveal that there would still be a signal controlled pedestrian crossing on Chiswick High Road immediately outside the church and across the Cycle Superhighway.

Chiswick High Road.PNG

Moreover, given its location on the corner of Chiswick High Road and Dukes Avenue, access for vehicles for services such as funerals and weddings should not be an issue.

The church itself comes under the Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster, which in 2011 announced that it was encouraging staff to cycle to its head office in Victoria.

At the time, a spokesman for the diocese said: "The aim is to spread the message that our lifestyles – whether at home, in church or in the wider world – influence the environment, and that our respectful and careful stewardship is vital."

Caspar Hughes, a member of the organising group of Stop Killing Cyclists, told road.cc: “CS9 will reduce pollution and road danger for the congregation of Our Lady of Grace & St Edwards and the surrounding area.

“As we see time and time again speeding and distracted driving is a serious cause of danger to people.

“Creating an environment where cycling and walking are given priority will go some way to removing the dangers drivers present to us all.”

Anyone with an opinion about the proposed route may find it more beneficial to respond to TfL's consultation on it, which remains open until 31 October 2017 and can be found here.

One church in London that is rather more welcoming to people on bikes is St James's Piccadilly, which this Sunday holds its annual Blessing of Cyclists service, with tea and cake in the garden afterwards.

Blessing of Cyclists at St James's Piccadilly.PNG

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

49 comments

Avatar
Spacer | 7 years ago
1 like

Dear Holy Trinity (God, Jesus and… er, is it Robin Hood?)

I know you couldn’t be arsed to intervene to prevent the Holocaust, Black Death, slave trade, rape, disease, famine, paedophilia, murder, suicide etc, but do you think you could help out in shifting a cycle route in London that me and some of my fellow parishioners imagine could be mildly inconvenient for us? Maybe deliver some leaflets or something?

Also, the back steps could do with a bit of a sweep.

Cheers mate

Amen

Avatar
escalinci | 7 years ago
1 like

It's a lovely church, I'd really rather they kept the pavement, which could be done by reducing the space for motors down to seven meters wide or so. Cars would still have most of the space on the street! This is why we're having arguments about cyclists vs pedestrians, because of the ruckus people getting stuck behind buses or deliveries would cause, when they should probably be on the great west road.

It does narrow quite a lot in front of the church in the plans, especially towards the junction. If it does go ahead as is maybe tfl could close of a bit of the side road next to the church and create a plaza-type thing there?

Avatar
700c | 7 years ago
1 like

Much hatred and abuse directed at an out- group here. If only us marginalised oppressed cyclists could practice what we preach, eh?!

Avatar
don simon fbpe replied to 700c | 7 years ago
0 likes

700c wrote:

Much hatred and abuse directed at an out- group here. If only us marginalised oppressed cyclists could practice what we preach, eh?!

I personally take the view that if they are happy to dish it out, then I expect it to be understood when thown back. And if they don't like it thrown back, they know what to do.

They don't like it up 'em!

Avatar
dottigirl | 7 years ago
2 likes

As proposed here:

https://twitter.com/RantyHighwayman/status/915998808265261056

Quote:

So, this controversy outside the church on #CS9.

The answer appears to be a network level change to fully close Dukes Ave between Chiswick High Rd and Bourne Place. This means the the track can pass the other side of the trees because the right and turn lanes into Dukes Ave are no longer required. This means the junction signals could be removed in favour of a zebra across Chiswick High Rd (make it humped); space would be freed up outside the Dukes Ave entrance to the church which could be made into a really nice bit of public realm for photos etc.
There would also be space to create a bay to be used by principal wedding and funeral cars (which can be reserved by traffic order). As a matter of fact, the wider area could be filtered into traffic cells because through traffic from Chiswick High Rd and the A4 could be accommodated via Sutton Court Rd & Heathfield Terrace for example. We get the cycle track, filter an area, create more of a setting for the church, provide a dedicated bay for the church and save on several sets of traffic signals. Seems like a winner.

Will never happen though - far too sensible.

Avatar
Jitensha Oni replied to dottigirl | 7 years ago
1 like

dottigirl wrote:

As proposed here:

https://twitter.com/RantyHighwayman/status/915998808265261056

Quote:

So, this controversy outside the church on #CS9.

The answer appears to be a network level change to fully close Dukes Ave between Chiswick High Rd and Bourne Place. This means the the track can pass the other side of the trees because the right and turn lanes into Dukes Ave are no longer required. This means the junction signals could be removed in favour of a zebra across Chiswick High Rd (make it humped); space would be freed up outside the Dukes Ave entrance to the church which could be made into a really nice bit of public realm for photos etc.
There would also be space to create a bay to be used by principal wedding and funeral cars (which can be reserved by traffic order). As a matter of fact, the wider area could be filtered into traffic cells because through traffic from Chiswick High Rd and the A4 could be accommodated via Sutton Court Rd & Heathfield Terrace for example. We get the cycle track, filter an area, create more of a setting for the church, provide a dedicated bay for the church and save on several sets of traffic signals. Seems like a winner.

Will never happen though - far too sensible.

I've just pointed the church twitter account to Ranty HIghwayman's suggestion. Anyone going to the  meeting might take a copy of dottigirl 's compilation and ask the churchpeople a) if they've read it (and if not why not, and "let me read it out to you" etc) and b) what objections they might have to this alternative.

Avatar
Another David | 7 years ago
0 likes

Nothing to be concerned about, they're paying to "god", and being there's no such entity their action can have no effect on the outcome

Avatar
antigee | 7 years ago
2 likes

a few times I've thought "for Jesus sake can't you take some space away from motorised vehicles" 

obviously my freelance praying isn't effective as the design above includes a dedicated right turn lane (the Lord tells me that is to meet the heavenly requirement to reduce congestion) - get rid of the right turn lane - maintain the pavement width - build a dedicated cycle facility were it should be in the road space not the pedestrian area Oh and the christians can gather in the side street by the new parking spaces and thank the Lord that they don't cycle to church

Avatar
OldRidgeback | 7 years ago
0 likes

Well everyone knows that cyclists are godless speed maniacs intent on dominating the roadway to the exclusion of all other road users

Avatar
brooksby | 7 years ago
3 likes

So does this church believe that funerals, brides, and first communion processions (?) all have "right of way" at present? Would they care to test that by walking out into the motor traffic which currently fills the road next to the church...?

Avatar
muhasib | 7 years ago
5 likes

Classic NIMBY tactic on their Facebook of agreeing with the sentiment of having the CS but that it just isn't practical where it is proposed to be routed; all crafted as a debate to imply that really they are onside and sympathise while actually totally opposed to anything that's makes a difference.

Avatar
Username | 7 years ago
2 likes

The church's position on their Facebook page is a bit more naunced:

 https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1445435135552642&id=300823800013787

There are some very good and thoughtful replies by Hounslow Cyclists.

Avatar
dottigirl | 7 years ago
4 likes

It's always amused me how few cyclists are religious. I suppose the Sunday Club Run is our Church.

Avatar
don simon fbpe | 7 years ago
9 likes

Selfish cunts.

Avatar
KevM | 7 years ago
10 likes

Religion annoys me. It turns respectable intelligent people (doctors/accountants/solicitors) into crazy folk with an imaginary friend. Their obvious intelligence fails them when applying common sense. They dont believe in Father Christmas because that would just be crazy but some other mythical being for which there is no physical evidence is ok.

Avatar
fixit | 7 years ago
2 likes

remember, this is the same old church that hanged and burned thousands of inocent people for no reason and gave power to thousands of evil people ,again, for no aparent reason..  cyclists road is none consiredred to them... they don't like it for no reason, they will pray for it to leave...

Avatar
Shouldbeinbed | 7 years ago
4 likes

It sounds from the comments like the church in question has either experienced or naively bought into the #bloodycyclists and lycra lout myth that we're all irresponsible speed obsessed yahoos. Maybe the local cycling groups could reach out and give them an opportunity to actually talk to a cross section of potential users to share (vent?) their concerns and engage in a myth busting exercise with them. I'd imagine that the CS is going to be busiest and most likely to be problematic to their way of thinking in AM & PM rush hours, which I suspect will not intersect too much with elderly outdoor congregations of people attending regular services at least and early AM is not a big time for funerals to be occurring if my experience of them is owt to go by.

Cynically tho, I'd rather they continue pray against the possibility of cycling infrastructure than petition or protest in more earthly ways.

Avatar
Helmut D. Bate replied to Shouldbeinbed | 7 years ago
1 like
Shouldbeinbed wrote:

It sounds from the comments like the church in question has either experienced or naively bought into the #bloodycyclists and lycra lout myth that we're all irresponsible speed obsessed yahoos.

Yeah, old farts who believe stone age silliness were never going to make the most progressive, critical thinkers.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
7 likes

Yet another clueless, selfish type who'd rather people in his parish be subjected to the dangers of errant motorists some of whom will be within his 'flock', than allow the right to safe passage. How very unchristrian of him!

Also ignoring the fact that pollutants will be eroding his church and causing premature deaths in the locality.

Having had to put up with very inconsiderate parking from church goers in both town and village the past 30 years frankly he can go get lost.

Avatar
thereverent | 7 years ago
5 likes

I expect this is a reflection of the elderly avarege age of their congregation and the numbers that will drive to service on a sunday.

There would be a solution for not losing any pavemnt space, but this would mean taking out the right turn lane eastbound and making it no right turn into Dukes Avenue (which I would expect the church and it's congregation would complain about).

Chiswick is a lovely place, badly blighted by car traffic (Not helped by the M4 running through it). It badly needs more people on bikes and less in cars.

 

Avatar
darrenleroy replied to thereverent | 7 years ago
0 likes

thereverent wrote:

I expect this is a reflection of the elderly avarege age of their congregation and the numbers that will drive to service on a sunday.

There would be a solution for not losing any pavemnt space, but this would mean taking out the right turn lane eastbound and making it no right turn into Dukes Avenue (which I would expect the church and it's congregation would complain about).

Chiswick is a lovely place, badly blighted by car traffic (Not helped by the M4 running through it). It badly needs more people on bikes and less in cars.

 

 

Fewer in cars. But I get your sentiment and tend to agree. Chiswick could be so cycle friendly with a bit of effort. Hopefully we'll see the results.

 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
5 likes

Have they even read the bible?

Isaiah 40:3

Quote:

The voice of him that crieth in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the LORD, make straight in the desert a highway for our God.

Proverbs 15:19

Quote:

A slacker's way is like a thorny hedge, but the path of the upright is a highway.

Revelations 20:1

Quote:

And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand.

Genesis 33:13

Quote:

Jacob replied, "My lord knows that the children are weak, and I have nursing sheep and cattle. If they are driven hard for one day, the whole herd will die.

Jeremiah 13:1

Quote:

The Lord said to me, "Go and buy some linen shorts and put them on. Do not put them in water."

Jeremiah 18:15

Quote:

Yet My people have forgotten Me. They burn incense to false [idols] that make them stumble in their ways- in the ancient roads- to walk on [new] paths, not the highway.

Deuteronomy 2:27

Quote:

'Let us travel through your land; we will keep strictly to the highway. We will not turn to the right or the left.

Genesis 8:15

Quote:

Then God spoke to Noah,

Avatar
Trilby | 7 years ago
0 likes

There, but for the grace of God go I.

Avatar
iandusud | 7 years ago
3 likes

I think they present some reasonable arguments for their case. Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of improving cycling infrastructure but it must be done in consultation with  locals and such concerns should be taken into consideration. 

Avatar
Miller | 7 years ago
1 like

That is a seriously weird rendition of a bicycle in the St James's flyer. 

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
7 likes

As a practising Cthulhu cultist, I shall be performing some ineffable rituals to fortify ALL cycle paths (and psychopaths as well - 2 for 1). Great Cthulhu is most interested in speedy food delivery and you can shift a lot more humans on bikes than in vehicles. Also, HE doesn't like it when his food is coughing from all the smog and pollution - it masks all the mad screaming.

On an entirely unrelated note, does anyone have a good cheap supplier of goats?

Avatar
DrG82 replied to hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
2 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

As a practising Cthulhu cultist, I shall be performing some ineffable rituals to fortify ALL cycle paths (and psychopaths as well - 2 for 1). Great Cthulhu is most interested in speedy food delivery and you can shift a lot more humans on bikes than in vehicles. Also, HE doesn't like it when his food is coughing from all the smog and pollution - it masks all the mad screaming.

On an entirely unrelated note, does anyone have a good cheap supplier of goats?

 

But Cthulhu is obviously evil because he's got a motor on that bike, and he's got wings which are likely to aid him up the climbs.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to DrG82 | 7 years ago
3 likes

DrG82 wrote:

hawkinspeter wrote:

As a practising Cthulhu cultist, I shall be performing some ineffable rituals to fortify ALL cycle paths (and psychopaths as well - 2 for 1). Great Cthulhu is most interested in speedy food delivery and you can shift a lot more humans on bikes than in vehicles. Also, HE doesn't like it when his food is coughing from all the smog and pollution - it masks all the mad screaming.

On an entirely unrelated note, does anyone have a good cheap supplier of goats?

 

But Cthulhu is obviously evil because he's got a motor on that bike, and he's got wings which are likely to aid him up the climbs.

Lord Cthulhu has no interest in human morality and has little regard for UCI regulations.

Avatar
graphite replied to hawkinspeter | 7 years ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Lord Cthulhu has no interest in human morality and has little regard for UCI regulations.

 

Hang on, that sounds like Pat McQuaid.  Certainly would explain a lot.

 

Avatar
FluffyKittenofT... replied to graphite | 7 years ago
2 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

Lord Cthulhu has no interest in human morality and has little regard for UCI regulations.

I would imagine he has a R'lyeh bike, which might also conflict with the regs, owing to its non-Euclidian geometry.

Pages

Latest Comments