A church in West London is urging parishioners to pray against a proposed Cycle Superhighway.
Transport for London (TfL) is currently consulting on its plans, unveiled last month, for Cycle Superhighway 9 from Kensington Olympia to Brentford, with a future extension to Hounslow.
> Plans for new West London Cycle Superhighway unveiled - but there's a missing link through Kensington
The two-way, segregated route would run along Chiswick High Road and past the Catholic Church of Our Lady of Grace & St Edward (the red brick building obscured by trees to the right of centre in this artist's impression).
The call to prayer was spotted by Twitter user Darren Moore.
On its website, the parish claims that “the pavement outside of the church will be reduced to about one third of its current size and the Cycle Superhighway would have right of way.”
It asks parishioners to consider the effect it would have on:
Sunday Mass congregations gathering on the pavement, the elderly, and families with children vs speeding cyclists
Funerals: no right of way for carrying the coffin
No right of way for First Holy Communion & other processions
Weddings: no right of way for Brides in their wedding dresses.
However, a map provided by TfL as part of its consultation reveal that there would still be a signal controlled pedestrian crossing on Chiswick High Road immediately outside the church and across the Cycle Superhighway.
Moreover, given its location on the corner of Chiswick High Road and Dukes Avenue, access for vehicles for services such as funerals and weddings should not be an issue.
The church itself comes under the Roman Catholic Diocese of Westminster, which in 2011 announced that it was encouraging staff to cycle to its head office in Victoria.
At the time, a spokesman for the diocese said: "The aim is to spread the message that our lifestyles – whether at home, in church or in the wider world – influence the environment, and that our respectful and careful stewardship is vital."
Caspar Hughes, a member of the organising group of Stop Killing Cyclists, told road.cc: “CS9 will reduce pollution and road danger for the congregation of Our Lady of Grace & St Edwards and the surrounding area.
“As we see time and time again speeding and distracted driving is a serious cause of danger to people.
“Creating an environment where cycling and walking are given priority will go some way to removing the dangers drivers present to us all.”
Anyone with an opinion about the proposed route may find it more beneficial to respond to TfL's consultation on it, which remains open until 31 October 2017 and can be found here.
One church in London that is rather more welcoming to people on bikes is St James's Piccadilly, which this Sunday holds its annual Blessing of Cyclists service, with tea and cake in the garden afterwards.
Add new comment
49 comments
Dear Holy Trinity (God, Jesus and… er, is it Robin Hood?)
I know you couldn’t be arsed to intervene to prevent the Holocaust, Black Death, slave trade, rape, disease, famine, paedophilia, murder, suicide etc, but do you think you could help out in shifting a cycle route in London that me and some of my fellow parishioners imagine could be mildly inconvenient for us? Maybe deliver some leaflets or something?
Also, the back steps could do with a bit of a sweep.
Cheers mate
Amen
It's a lovely church, I'd really rather they kept the pavement, which could be done by reducing the space for motors down to seven meters wide or so. Cars would still have most of the space on the street! This is why we're having arguments about cyclists vs pedestrians, because of the ruckus people getting stuck behind buses or deliveries would cause, when they should probably be on the great west road.
It does narrow quite a lot in front of the church in the plans, especially towards the junction. If it does go ahead as is maybe tfl could close of a bit of the side road next to the church and create a plaza-type thing there?
Much hatred and abuse directed at an out- group here. If only us marginalised oppressed cyclists could practice what we preach, eh?!
I personally take the view that if they are happy to dish it out, then I expect it to be understood when thown back. And if they don't like it thrown back, they know what to do.
They don't like it up 'em!
As proposed here:
https://twitter.com/RantyHighwayman/status/915998808265261056
Will never happen though - far too sensible.
I've just pointed the church twitter account to Ranty HIghwayman's suggestion. Anyone going to the meeting might take a copy of dottigirl 's compilation and ask the churchpeople a) if they've read it (and if not why not, and "let me read it out to you" etc) and b) what objections they might have to this alternative.
Nothing to be concerned about, they're paying to "god", and being there's no such entity their action can have no effect on the outcome
a few times I've thought "for Jesus sake can't you take some space away from motorised vehicles"
obviously my freelance praying isn't effective as the design above includes a dedicated right turn lane (the Lord tells me that is to meet the heavenly requirement to reduce congestion) - get rid of the right turn lane - maintain the pavement width - build a dedicated cycle facility were it should be in the road space not the pedestrian area Oh and the christians can gather in the side street by the new parking spaces and thank the Lord that they don't cycle to church
Well everyone knows that cyclists are godless speed maniacs intent on dominating the roadway to the exclusion of all other road users
So does this church believe that funerals, brides, and first communion processions (?) all have "right of way" at present? Would they care to test that by walking out into the motor traffic which currently fills the road next to the church...?
Classic NIMBY tactic on their Facebook of agreeing with the sentiment of having the CS but that it just isn't practical where it is proposed to be routed; all crafted as a debate to imply that really they are onside and sympathise while actually totally opposed to anything that's makes a difference.
The church's position on their Facebook page is a bit more naunced:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1445435135552642&id=300823800013787
There are some very good and thoughtful replies by Hounslow Cyclists.
It's always amused me how few cyclists are religious. I suppose the Sunday Club Run is our Church.
Selfish cunts.
Religion annoys me. It turns respectable intelligent people (doctors/accountants/solicitors) into crazy folk with an imaginary friend. Their obvious intelligence fails them when applying common sense. They dont believe in Father Christmas because that would just be crazy but some other mythical being for which there is no physical evidence is ok.
remember, this is the same old church that hanged and burned thousands of inocent people for no reason and gave power to thousands of evil people ,again, for no aparent reason.. cyclists road is none consiredred to them... they don't like it for no reason, they will pray for it to leave...
It sounds from the comments like the church in question has either experienced or naively bought into the #bloodycyclists and lycra lout myth that we're all irresponsible speed obsessed yahoos. Maybe the local cycling groups could reach out and give them an opportunity to actually talk to a cross section of potential users to share (vent?) their concerns and engage in a myth busting exercise with them. I'd imagine that the CS is going to be busiest and most likely to be problematic to their way of thinking in AM & PM rush hours, which I suspect will not intersect too much with elderly outdoor congregations of people attending regular services at least and early AM is not a big time for funerals to be occurring if my experience of them is owt to go by.
Cynically tho, I'd rather they continue pray against the possibility of cycling infrastructure than petition or protest in more earthly ways.
Yeah, old farts who believe stone age silliness were never going to make the most progressive, critical thinkers.
Yet another clueless, selfish type who'd rather people in his parish be subjected to the dangers of errant motorists some of whom will be within his 'flock', than allow the right to safe passage. How very unchristrian of him!
Also ignoring the fact that pollutants will be eroding his church and causing premature deaths in the locality.
Having had to put up with very inconsiderate parking from church goers in both town and village the past 30 years frankly he can go get lost.
I expect this is a reflection of the elderly avarege age of their congregation and the numbers that will drive to service on a sunday.
There would be a solution for not losing any pavemnt space, but this would mean taking out the right turn lane eastbound and making it no right turn into Dukes Avenue (which I would expect the church and it's congregation would complain about).
Chiswick is a lovely place, badly blighted by car traffic (Not helped by the M4 running through it). It badly needs more people on bikes and less in cars.
Fewer in cars. But I get your sentiment and tend to agree. Chiswick could be so cycle friendly with a bit of effort. Hopefully we'll see the results.
Have they even read the bible?
Isaiah 40:3
Proverbs 15:19
Revelations 20:1
Genesis 33:13
Jeremiah 13:1
Jeremiah 18:15
Deuteronomy 2:27
Genesis 8:15
There, but for the grace of God go I.
I think they present some reasonable arguments for their case. Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favour of improving cycling infrastructure but it must be done in consultation with locals and such concerns should be taken into consideration.
That is a seriously weird rendition of a bicycle in the St James's flyer.
As a practising Cthulhu cultist, I shall be performing some ineffable rituals to fortify ALL cycle paths (and psychopaths as well - 2 for 1). Great Cthulhu is most interested in speedy food delivery and you can shift a lot more humans on bikes than in vehicles. Also, HE doesn't like it when his food is coughing from all the smog and pollution - it masks all the mad screaming.
On an entirely unrelated note, does anyone have a good cheap supplier of goats?
tumblr_n5ta4yFWD41r3rqkso1_500.jpg
But Cthulhu is obviously evil because he's got a motor on that bike, and he's got wings which are likely to aid him up the climbs.
Lord Cthulhu has no interest in human morality and has little regard for UCI regulations.
Hang on, that sounds like Pat McQuaid. Certainly would explain a lot.
I would imagine he has a R'lyeh bike, which might also conflict with the regs, owing to its non-Euclidian geometry.
Pages