- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Tubeless valves
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
Add new comment
56 comments
Park Street improvement plans approved despite some traders’ fears: https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/park-street-improvement-plans-approved/
So, if traffic flows like water, we need to be building aqueducts. Also, how can traffic flow uphill up Park Street?
Also on BBC: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2jg18j122o
I hadn't read Rob Bryher's response:
Hang about - when did water start moving in 'random directions'? I was under the impression it generally* followed the dictates of gravity.
[* Things like wicking and siphoning excepted.]
So does water, if you give it long enough.
1785, or 1827 - in terms of observation. Although I believe the theory has existed for a long time.
Is that like when cars are forced to veer violently across the road by invisible cyclists?
It's the invisible * motions of cyclists "wobbling across the road" that causes otherwise careful and competent drivers to randomly drive into them.
* Only visible in defence accounts in court.
Excellent - and a pity the Beeb didn't quote more. (At least they got in his rejoinder though).
Don't forget folks - "Under the plans cars will still be able to access the street via side roads but will not be able to drive from end to end."
Some people * don't want the slightest change to the motoring status quo. Even while saying "there are problems, and we want to address them". And even where it may ultimately benefit everyone including those who use cars sometimes.
* Somehow - and it might be partial road.cc reporting - but somehow it always seem to be more often the Conservatives (joined here by the Liberals). Although elsewhere Labour, SNP and even on occasion the Greens have shown that opposing checks on motoring and dismissing active travel is widely seen as a popular cause and a vote-winner.
Really good news. Still has one hurdle to get over, according to BBC, but they don't say what that is. Maybe it needs WECA approval (in which case, I fear it won't happen if Helen Godwin wins).
And it's worth remembering it's not just Park St – it's from Vic Rooms down to College Green. https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/park-street-improvemen...
Another day, another BristolPost piece about Park St:
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/park-street-bus-gate-latest-10008820
Controversial £15 million Park Street scheme will 'gridlock' Bristol:
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/controversial-15-million-park-street-9983746
Another collection of opinions?
Haven't spent much time in Bristol for decades - but back in the day much was pretty gridlocked at least once per day. Has it got better?
Nope
I think it has got better in some locations. For example, Baldwin Street and Victoria Street. Bus gates there have improved conditions greatly for me. I guess I might feel differently if I wanted to drive a car that way
Better in some places and worse in others. There's still plenty of gridlock going on. I want them to bring back the rickety flyover by Temple Meads. (https://www.bristolworld.com/retro/bristol-redcliffe-flyover-nostalgic-pics-4145123)
Local 'nimbyism' dismissed as consensus is new scheme will 'increase footfall'
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/local-nimbyism-dismissed-consensus-new-9980133
(Not much to see there - just a collection of opinions)
Tories blast ‘baffling’ plan to restrict cars on Park Street:
https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/tories-blast-baffling-plan-restrict-cars-park-street/
I expect it is baffling if you're some kind of Tory carbrain that doesn't care about people's health and well-being.
"Businesses say ‘we will leave’ in response to Park Street bus gate
Independent businesses said they will leave Park Street if the proposed scheme goes ahead"
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/businesses-say-we-leave-...
Seems like that decline is nothing to do with the CAZ or bus gates and everything to do with there being more coffee shops?
Wonder what could ultimately be behind that though?
* Strokes chin, looking at the changes in the high street over the last few decades: the continuing growth of motornormativity, online everything, cultural shifts in consumption ... then shakes head - no, must be buses or cycling or something. *
Its ridiculous, though: I do not for one moment believe that people drive onto Park Street and then park their car outside (or even, near) Woodes to get a coffee or whatever. And TBH I don't imagine that very many park outside, or near, any of the shops on Park Street. It just isn't that sort of a road.
I'll miss Woodes if it does indeed vanish, but the idea that motorists kept it going is bizarre. It is surrounded by some major workplaces in easy walking distance: the council, the university, environment agency. Working from home?
You're right - it's more like Cotham Hill and just look how that has been ruined (ruined!) by being closed to through traffic and filled with nice shops and restaurants.
Ah, Park Street - that lovely area of artisan merchants and free flowing traffic
(note the double-parked van facing oncoming traffic and stopped *right next to a parking space)
Not Park St, but fairly near, in a region of the city that was essentially given over to heavy traffic infrastructure.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2p542743wo
https://harbourhopes.co.uk/
"It is within easy reach of both the centre of Bristol and the green of Ashton Court by foot or by bike."
There has been a reasonable route throgh the current mess for peds and bikes, but it has been closed now for months to suit the developers of an adjacent plot. The route (sustrans signs and all) is permitted rather than a public right of way. I want to see if the new plans make the situation worse.
I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to dealing with heavy traffic.
That should be a lovely area if it's properly developed and they sort out the road mess.
Tory metro mayor candidate slams plans to close Park Street to through-traffic: https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/tory-metro-mayor-candidate-slams-plans-close-park-street-through-traffic/
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/park-street-businesses-s...
Just send 'em over here or here...
Pages