Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

forum

Bristol - Pictures show exactly how Park Street will change after major transformation

//lirp.cdn-website.com/55360c1a/dms3rep/multi/opt/bristol-sqiuirrel-control-1920w.jpg)

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/gallery/pictures-show-ex...

There's some interesting changes planned for Park Street - looks to me as though their going to use appropriate design language for the road/pavement

//i2-prod.bristolpost.co.uk/incoming/article9868111.ece/ALTERNATES/s1227b/0_TCBR160124ParkStreetBRI_02.jpg)

If you're new please join in and if you have questions pop them below and the forum regulars will answer as best we can.

Add new comment

56 comments

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
2 likes

Park Street improvement plans approved despite some traders’ fears: https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/park-street-improvement-plans-approved/

Quote:

Conservative councillors on the transport policy committee warned the traffic could instead be displaced onto Park Row and past the BRI.

Mark Weston, leader of Bristol’s Conservative group, said: “Traffic flows like water. Once you start stopping it up, it then moves into random directions.

“We’re creating a problem. We’re not solving it, we’re just moving it.

“We need to have a resilient road network where traffic can flow, not constantly keep limiting the roads that are available to use.”

So, if traffic flows like water, we need to be building aqueducts. Also, how can traffic flow uphill up Park Street?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
0 likes
Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
3 likes

I hadn't read Rob Bryher's response:

Quote:

Green councillor Rob Bryher said: “Water and traffic are not the same thing. Traffic doesn’t work like water. Roads aren’t pipes.

“If you block a pipe, obviously the water will go a different way because of physics. If you block traffic, that isn’t the way that it works because it engages people’s travel behaviour. It’s a fundamental transport planning principle.

“There’s been lots of literature that shows if you restrict through-traffic, then traffic just evaporates. It’s part of transport planning that everyone understands if you’ve done a little bit of research into it.

“People behave differently if you change the priorities of a street. It’s just as simple as that. You have to get your head around that a bit more.”

Avatar
mdavidford replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
3 likes

hawkinspeter wrote:

Quote:

“Traffic flows like water. Once you start stopping it up, it then moves into random directions."

Hang about - when did water start moving in 'random directions'? I was under the impression it generally* followed the dictates of gravity.

[* Things like wicking and siphoning excepted.]

hawkinspeter wrote:
Quote:

 “Traffic doesn’t work like water.

“There’s been lots of literature that shows if you restrict through-traffic, then traffic just evaporates.”

So does water, if you give it long enough.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 1 day ago
1 like

mdavidford wrote:

Hang about - when did water start moving in 'random directions'?

1785, or 1827 - in terms of observation. Although I believe the theory has existed for a long time.

Avatar
mdavidford replied to chrisonabike | 1 day ago
2 likes

Is that like when cars are forced to veer violently across the road by invisible cyclists?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to mdavidford | 1 day ago
1 like

It's the invisible * motions of cyclists "wobbling across the road" that causes otherwise careful and competent drivers to randomly drive into them.

*  Only visible in defence accounts in court.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
2 likes

Excellent - and a pity the Beeb didn't quote more.  (At least they got in his rejoinder though).

Don't forget folks - "Under the plans cars will still be able to access the street via side roads but will not be able to drive from end to end."

Some people * don't want the slightest change to the motoring status quo.  Even while saying "there are problems, and we want to address them".  And even where it may ultimately benefit everyone including those who use cars sometimes.

* Somehow - and it might be partial road.cc reporting - but somehow it always seem to be more often the Conservatives (joined here by the Liberals).  Although elsewhere Labour, SNP and even on occasion the Greens have shown that opposing checks on motoring and dismissing active travel is widely seen as a popular cause and a vote-winner.

Avatar
Bmblbzzz replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
1 like

Really good news. Still has one hurdle to get over, according to BBC, but they don't say what that is. Maybe it needs WECA approval (in which case, I fear it won't happen if Helen Godwin wins).

Avatar
Bmblbzzz replied to hawkinspeter | 1 day ago
3 likes

And it's worth remembering it's not just Park St – it's from Vic Rooms down to College Green. https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/park-street-improvemen...

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 week ago
1 like

Another day, another BristolPost piece about Park St:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/park-street-bus-gate-latest-10008820

Quote:

Conservatives are demanding that “disastrous” £15million plans to close Park Street to cars and vans should be abandoned. Green-led Bristol City Council announced in January that a 24-hour bus gate would be installed at the top of the road where it meets Park Row at Clifton Triangle and a bus lane to run up from the Centre.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 week ago
0 likes

Controversial £15 million Park Street scheme will 'gridlock' Bristol:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/controversial-15-million-park-street-9983746

Another collection of opinions?

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 week ago
0 likes

Haven't spent much time in Bristol for decades - but back in the day much was pretty gridlocked at least once per day. Has it got better?

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to chrisonabike | 1 week ago
1 like

chrisonabike wrote:

Haven't spent much time in Bristol for decades - but back in the day much was pretty gridlocked at least once per day. Has it got better?

Nope

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 week ago
0 likes

Avatar
slc replied to hawkinspeter | 1 week ago
3 likes
hawkinspeter wrote:

chrisonabike wrote:

Haven't spent much time in Bristol for decades - but back in the day much was pretty gridlocked at least once per day. Has it got better?

Nope

I think it has got better in some locations. For example, Baldwin Street and Victoria Street. Bus gates there have improved conditions greatly for me. I guess I might feel differently if I wanted to drive a car that way  1

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 week ago
1 like

slc wrote:

I think it has got better in some locations. For example, Baldwin Street and Victoria Street. Bus gates there have improved conditions greatly for me. I guess I might feel differently if I wanted to drive a car that way  1

Better in some places and worse in others. There's still plenty of gridlock going on. I want them to bring back the rickety flyover by Temple Meads. (https://www.bristolworld.com/retro/bristol-redcliffe-flyover-nostalgic-pics-4145123)

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 2 weeks ago
3 likes

Local 'nimbyism' dismissed as consensus is new scheme will 'increase footfall'

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/news-opinion/local-nimbyism-dismissed-consensus-new-9980133

(Not much to see there - just a collection of opinions)

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 2 weeks ago
4 likes

Tories blast ‘baffling’ plan to restrict cars on Park Street:

https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/tories-blast-baffling-plan-restrict-cars-park-street/

I expect it is baffling if you're some kind of Tory carbrain that doesn't care about people's health and well-being.

Avatar
brooksby | 3 weeks ago
4 likes

"Businesses say ‘we will leave’ in response to Park Street bus gate

Independent businesses said they will leave Park Street if the proposed scheme goes ahead"

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/businesses-say-we-leave-...

Quote:

For Park Street’s oldest business, it is claimed the proposed scheme would be the beginning of the end.  Woodes, a café which opened in 1966 and has remained at 18 Park Street ever since, has seen customers dwindle in recent years but the owner, Rudy, said that residents will suffer.

… He said: “Park Street used to have a bank on it, a Waterstones, had lots of independent clothes shops, furniture shops, lighting shops.

“The high street has changed from quirky, interesting independent shops to coffee shop, coffee shop, coffee shop. It’s gone from being a place good for wandering around to just shops selling the same product.”

Seems like that decline is nothing to do with the CAZ or bus gates and everything to do with there being more coffee shops?

 

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to brooksby | 3 weeks ago
5 likes

Wonder what could ultimately be behind that though?

* Strokes chin, looking at the changes in the high street over the last few decades: the continuing growth of motornormativity, online everything, cultural shifts in consumption ... then shakes head - no, must be buses or cycling or something. *

Avatar
brooksby replied to chrisonabike | 3 weeks ago
4 likes

Its ridiculous, though: I do not for one moment believe that people drive onto Park Street and then park their car outside (or even, near) Woodes to get a coffee or whatever.  And TBH I don't imagine that very many park outside, or near, any of the shops on Park Street.  It just isn't that sort of a road.

Avatar
slc replied to brooksby | 3 weeks ago
7 likes

brooksby wrote:

Its ridiculous, though: I do not for one moment believe that people drive onto Park Street and then park their car outside (or even, near) Woodes to get a coffee or whatever.  And TBH I don't imagine that very many park outside, or near, any of the shops on Park Street.  It just isn't that sort of a road.

I'll miss Woodes if it does indeed vanish, but the idea that motorists kept it going is bizarre. It is surrounded by some major workplaces in easy walking distance: the council, the university, environment agency. Working from home?

Avatar
Dnnnnnn replied to brooksby | 3 weeks ago
6 likes

brooksby wrote:

It just isn't that sort of a road.

You're right - it's more like Cotham Hill and just look how that has been ruined (ruined!) by being closed to through traffic and filled with nice shops and restaurants.

Avatar
brooksby | 1 month ago
4 likes

Ah, Park Street - that lovely area of artisan merchants and free flowing traffic 

(note the double-parked van facing oncoming traffic and stopped *right next to a parking space)

Avatar
slc | 1 month ago
3 likes

Not Park St, but fairly near, in a region of the city that was essentially given over to heavy traffic infrastructure. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2p542743wo

https://harbourhopes.co.uk/

"It is within easy reach of both the centre of Bristol and the green of Ashton Court by foot or by bike."

There has been a reasonable route throgh the current mess for peds and bikes, but it has been closed now for months to suit the developers of an adjacent plot. The route (sustrans signs and all) is permitted rather than a public right of way. I want to see if the new plans make the situation worse.

Avatar
hawkinspeter replied to slc | 1 month ago
2 likes

slc wrote:

Not Park St, but fairly near, in a region of the city that was essentially given over to heavy traffic infrastructure. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2p542743wo

https://harbourhopes.co.uk/

"It is within easy reach of both the centre of Bristol and the green of Ashton Court by foot or by bike."

There has been a reasonable route throgh the current mess for peds and bikes, but it has been closed now for months to suit the developers of an adjacent plot. The route (sustrans signs and all) is permitted rather than a public right of way. I want to see if the new plans make the situation worse.

I often come into Bristol along the dual carriageway there as it's quicker than trying to find my way on the bike paths, but then I'm used to dealing with heavy traffic.

That should be a lovely area if it's properly developed and they sort out the road mess.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

Tory metro mayor candidate slams plans to close Park Street to through-traffic: https://www.bristol247.com/news-and-features/news/tory-metro-mayor-candidate-slams-plans-close-park-street-through-traffic/

Quote:

Steve Smith predicts that if the plans as part of improvements to the number 2 bus route go ahead, they will put jobs at risk by “hammering” the businesses along the road.

Park Street has historically been one of Bristol’s most exclusive shopping districts but in recent years has lost much of its glamour.

Former councillor Smith’s dire predictions are not born out by studies from across the world.

Academic research has proved that “urban regeneration through pedestrianised spaces has shown to increase physical activity levels, reduce car dependency and improve economic activity”.

Evidence also shows that pedestrianisation generally has a positive or neutral effect economically, with shop vacancy rates five times higher on streets with high levels of traffic.

Avatar
hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
4 likes

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/park-street-businesses-s...

Quote:

Independent businesses along one of Bristol’s most famous streets, which is subject to a £15 million transformation scheme, say the plans “will have a catastrophic effect” on the street. In January, Bristol City Council announced that Park Street could soon have a bus gate at one end and a bus lane at the other, closing the road to through traffic.

Avatar
chrisonabike replied to hawkinspeter | 1 month ago
3 likes

Just send 'em over here or here...

Pages

Latest Comments