Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

More cycle parking, less car parking in London mayor's draft plan

New housing and offices near public transport links will be car-free

Published this week, Sadiq Khan’s draft London Plan will aim to encourage people out of their cars and to make cycling and walking easier. New requirements will see an increase in cycle parking around new shops and homes, while developments will need to be car-free in areas that are well-connected by public transport.

The Mayor wants to increase the proportion of trips made on foot, by bike and by public transport to 80 per cent by 2041, compared to 64 per cent now – equating to around three million fewer car journeys in London each day.

Khan said: “To secure the future health and prosperity of our city, we need to be bolder in encouraging people to reduce their reliance on cars. It’s essential for dealing with congestion as London’s population grows, and crucial for reducing our toxic air pollution emissions.

“My draft London Plan will set out how I want to transform how London’s infrastructure works, making cycling and walking a safe and convenient alternative for millions more journeys every day. If you buy or rent a home in London and make regular journeys to the work or shops, I want to see safe and secure cycle parking available for every journey, across all parts of the city. For too long our housing and infrastructure has been built solely around the car.

“Currently only around a third of Londoners do enough walking and cycling each day to stay healthy. Reshaping our city around walking, cycling and public transport is essential for getting more Londoners active, but will also improve our quality of life and the environment for everyone.”

London’s population is set to expand from 8.7 million to 10.5 million over the next 25 years, generating more than five million additional trips a day across the transport network.

If no further action is taken to reduce congestion, Greater London Authority figures show that by 2041, three days would be lost per person every year due to congestion on roads, and 50,000 hours would be lost to slower bus speeds in the morning peak every day.

Last month a city planning report by think tank Centre for London said that motorists would ultimately have to give up residential car parking to tackle such problems, with greater transport emphasis instead placed on trains, buses and bikes.

The draft London Plan seems cut from similar cloth. Housing developments in the parts of London best connected by public transport will be expected to be car-free, with no parking provided other than for disabled people (and the amount of parking allowed will not increase as unit sizes increase).

Similarly, office developments in central and inner London will no longer provide commuter or visitor parking, other than for disabled people and for essential delivery and servicing purposes.

In many parts of London, the level of cycle parking required outside shops will be doubled, while cycle parking requirements for new office developments will increase significantly where demand is high or where an area has high potential for cycling growth.

The requirements for long-stay cycle parking for student accommodation will also double from one space per two bedrooms to one-to-one provision.

Roger Geffen, Policy Director at Cycling UK said: “One of the attractions of a city like London is the ability to get around without needing to own a car. However, with our population set to grow, we urgently need to make London and other cities more cycle-friendly and less car-dependent, with cleaner air, healthier streets and a thriving economy for everyone who lives, works or spends time there.”

Matt Winfield, London Director for Sustrans, said: “Cycling is already the fastest-growing choice for travel around the capital and making sure new development plays its part in making it easier, safer and more convenient is absolutely vital.

“With two in three journeys already made by foot, cycle or public transport, the Mayor’s plan should ensure that new developments reflect the way Londoners travel now and will do in the future.

“Planning more homes and offices close to stations will ensure that people moving in to London’s newest buildings can live without the need for a car. Planners and developers must make sure the streets around them are welcome places to walk or cycle, and that they connect into London’s new Superhighways and Quietways, so that more of us can safely cycle for our everyday needs.

“Cycle parking in new buildings has been woefully inadequate in meeting today’s demand let alone in the future. I welcome news that the new plan will start to address this.”

Alex has written for more cricket publications than the rest of the road.cc team combined. Despite the apparent evidence of this picture, he doesn't especially like cake.

Add new comment

6 comments

Avatar
Grahamd | 7 years ago
1 like

Am somewhat surprised that the developers have not come out in support of this given that most planning applications have to show car parking provision. Replacing this with cycle capacity would obviously be cheaper and potentially allow them to squeeze properties together.

Avatar
Simboid | 7 years ago
0 likes

How about an actual building you can pay to park in securely? Or even several of them? I can't fathom why there isn't anywhere in the the whole of London.

We have the Bike Park here in Leicester and I think it's spoiled me, 50p for less than an hour outprices any car park. A fiver would do the same thing in London and make someone with a city centre basement a pretty penny, surely? It really is hard to believe that there's nowhere safe in the smoke to put your fancy commuter bike.

Avatar
BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
0 likes

More waffle that doesn't address the real issues, he's a clueless right winger just trying to appease certain groups without actually doing anything meaningful.

Avatar
Bluebug replied to BehindTheBikesheds | 7 years ago
0 likes
BehindTheBikesheds wrote:

More waffle that doesn't address the real issues, he's a clueless right winger just trying to appease certain groups without actually doing anything meaningful.

He is a Labour Mayor who helped Corbyn get in the position he is so he's definitely not a right winger.

He just doesn't agree with you as he has to come up with plans that are feasible, can be successfully put past the London Assembly, that includes parties on the right, and get developers, who are only interested in money, to action them.

Avatar
jasecd | 7 years ago
2 likes

This is positive and exactly what the Mayor of London should be doing but what is missing is what is always missing from any announcements like this - where is the outrage over driving standards?

I firmly believe that the ultimate cause of low cycling numbers is the behaviour of a sizeable minority of drivers. Wilfully seflish, ignorant and dangerous driving should not be tolerated. Those in power should be putting money into enforcement and speaking out against this at every turn. If the roads were safer and poor driving was not tolerated then schemes like this would happen organically and everyone would benefit.

 

 

Avatar
Bluebug replied to jasecd | 7 years ago
0 likes
jasecd wrote:

This is positive and exactly what the Mayor of London should be doing but what is missing is what is always missing from any announcements like this - where is the outrage over driving standards?

I firmly believe that the ultimate cause of low cycling numbers is the behaviour of a sizeable minority of drivers. Wilfully seflish, ignorant and dangerous driving should not be tolerated. Those in power should be putting money into enforcement and speaking out against this at every turn. If the roads were safer and poor driving was not tolerated then schemes like this would happen organically and everyone would benefit.

Young people don't have an issue with cycling it is older people.

Young people's main issue is bike storage - not everyone is happy to store their bike in their bedroom or drag it up flights of stairs - and bike theft - which the police aren't interested in thanks to CPS attitudes.

Latest Comments