Less than six months before the United Kingdom is due to leave the European Union (EU), it has been announced that Manchester is to benefit from mentoring by Copenhagen on how to become more bike friendly under a scheme entirely financed by the EU and which falls under its wider Horizon 2020 programme.
According to the Cycling Embassy of Denmark the initiative, called Handshake, forms part of the EU’s Horizon 2020 project – its biggest ever research and development programme.
It will see 10 cities across the EU that have aspirations to become true cycling cities mentored by three that can already lay claim to that status – Amsterdam, Copenhagen and Munich.
Besides Manchester, Copenhagen will also act as mentor city for the Latvian capital, Riga, and Helsinki in Finland.
The other cities involved in the programme, which is due to last between are Bordeaux, Bruges, Cadiz, Dublin, Krakow, Rome, Turin and Dublin.
The mentor cities will each be looking to learn something too – in Copenhagen’s case, it hopes to learn from Amsterdam about cycle parking facilities and how to deal with bikes that have been abandoned.
At their first meeting last week, delegates from the 13 cities visited the Danish capital to learn how cycling had become so popular there and to see first-hand the city’s infrastructure.
During the three-to-five years that the programme will run, the cities involved will participate in workshops and study trips, while the University of Amsterdam will be co-ordinating their findings.
Chris Boardman, now Greater Manchester’s cycling and walking commissioner visited Copenhagen in 2015 in his role as British Cycling’s policy advisor, and invited former cycling minister Robert Goodwill to accompany him on his trip to the city.
> Video: Chris Boardman's 3 cycling lessons UK can take from Denmark
Speaking of the EU initiative, he said: “Handshake is a really exciting opportunity for us to learn form the best. We want to turn Manchester into a city where the bicycle is the most obvious and attractive means of transport.
“This collaboration will give us a much better understanding of what Copenhagen, Amsterdam, and Munich have done so well – and to incorporate those ideas and experiences into our work here in Manchester.”
Copenhagen’s mayor of technical and environmental affairs, Ninna Hedeager Olsen, said the city would not be resting on its laurels and that it could improve conditions for cyclists even more by learning from elsewhere:
She said: “If Copenhagen is to be the world’s best city for cyclists, we have to be at the cutting edge so we don’t get left behind.
“Copenhagen has very good bicycle infrastructure, but when it comes to bicycle parking facilities and handling abandoned bikes, Amsterdam is 10-15 years ahead of us. We need to learn from their best practice.
“Testing the established ways of doing things is always healthy, and the cooperation with Amsterdam can definitely challenge our conventional thinking.
“Amsterdam has many years’ experience establishing bicycle streets where the street is laid out on the cyclists’ terms but where cars are also welcome. This is interesting know-how which we will now systematically get access to.”
She continued: “The big cities are responsible for the majority of the world’s CO2 emissions, and so we also have a deciding responsibility for developing and spreading the good sustainable solutions.
“Every year, Copenhagen receives a high number of delegations who want to know the secret behind Copenhagen’s success as a cycle city.
“I hope that we through this new co-operation can help spread our know-how to an even higher degree,” she added.
The Handshake programme, which was announced earlier this year, is co-ordinated by Isinnova – the Institute of Studies for the Integration of Systems – an independent research institute based in
Given that the project is fully funded by the EU, we have contacted Transport for Greater Manchester regarding the implications of Brexit for the region’s continued participation in the programme and will update this article with their response when we receive it.
Add new comment
11 comments
I went to Denmark on holiday last year and spent a couple of days in Copenhagen. The cycling was amazing. Absolutely rammed with cyclists, proper segregated infrastructure, cyclists given priority. Brilliant.
I moved to Copenhagen just over a year ago and, from my experience of cycling every day through and around the city, it could not be more different from cycling in the UK. There's still the occasional terrible driver who doesn't look for you when they're turning, but the average driver always gives way to cyclists.
The bigger problem is cyclists who are cycling in a genuinely unsafe way. A very high number of people wear headphones while cycling, as well as use their phone (either calling or texting). I'd say the average cycling speed is between 10 and 15 km/h here, so it can be very frustrating when people are in the way and not paying attention to a bell ringing behind them. I've been knocked off my bike once, and that was by another cyclist who decided to start drifting to side as I was overtaking them, without looking or giving any warning.
Despite the tinted window BMW drivers who have never heard of indicating or stopping, and the seemingly blind and deaf cyclists, I feel so incredibly safe to cycle in this city. The wide cycle lanes are one thing, but the main reason is that almost everyone cycles regularly, including the people who happen to be driving on any one day. I know everyone says it, but it really is part of the culture, and I just don't believe it ever will be in the UK. All these schemes and plans might help meet a target, but they won't make a real difference.
Exactly this, it'll be a gradual thing (or maybe not post brexit if people can't afford to drive as much) but the more people that cycle, even just once or twice a month, will likely make them more aware of cyclists when they're driving, this is half the problem in the uk, so few drivers have actually ridden a bike in decades, that they have no concept of what it's actually like being a vulnerable road user.
I expect your average Brexit voter would probably say this is another good reason for leaving the EU.
What have good British folk got to learn about cycling from a bunch of foreigners? We already know the solution is for cyclists to pay road tax, get insurance, compulsory helmets etc. Preferably just get them off the road but not spend any money on giving them better cycling facilities.
I would guess that a large proportion of cycle haters are also ardent brexiters.
Seems statistically highly likely to be the case, given all the correlating demographic factors.
Though the EU as such is not great on cycling or transport policy in general anyway. It's only certain member states that get it right.
Maybe different countries should be put in charge of different policy areas (the Dutch in charge of transport, the French or Italians or, well, anyone but Northern/Eastern Europeans, really, and especially not us, in charge of food...maybe we'd get the 'popular music' portfolio?)
e.g.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/28/eu-emissions-limits-...
Maybe my previous, oh so criticised comments about Brexit weren't so far off the mark. Whatever.
This is a win-win for everyone, but especially the ten cities hoping to become proper cycling cities. We have had the example of the Amsterdam's etc for the past thirty years, but have steadfastly refused to learn from them, prefering our little bits of painted tarmac, 100 yards of cycling heaven according to the authorities, to the proven techniques of continental cities, in most cases, wilfully ignoring them. I sincerely hope that CB makes such a success of Manchester that even the most petrol-brained moton minister won't be able to deny it.
Except the target should be removing motors from the roads completely so we are not having to build ineffective cycle specific infra. The new Manchester cycle 'infra' is okay but let's not kid ourtselves it's not good enough or wide/big enough for proper mass cycling, it's still circuitous and still stop start.
If we do things like the Dutch that will lead to far more deaths at junctions where infra crosses roads, the 'safe' dutch are currently over 60 deaths a year just at these locations alone.
Lucky it's the Danish in Copenhagen that is mentoring Manchester then!
Actually, I would say its mostly radial, not circuitous. Quality varies but newer schemes are generally improving, and their is a real sense of will behind the plans.
The A56 featuring in yesterday's NMOTD with the pedestrian schoolgirl is one of Boardman's big ticket items and one of the major roads "severing communities" that the Beeline policy is trying to address.
In The Netherlands many more people cycle, so it's much safer even if the raw number appear larger.
Junctions will always be where most injury occurs, because it is where modes interact most, we shouldn't disregard good cycle infrastructure just because it doesn't completely solve the most difficult part.
EU funded, you say?
Would be good to have someone from Copenhagen or Amsterdam respond to the usual muppetry about how there is no alternative to driving to the shops / work / school without the economy collapsing, children being abducted and anyone with the slightest mobility issue being effectively placed under house arrest.
I mean just look at the places where they depend on cycling... who'd want to live in such places... oh, hang on.