In recent years, it’s become one of the big debates among cyclists – is it safe to listen to your personal music player while you ride? Now, a California-based company has launched a speaker system that provides surround sound via a bike helmet, leaving the user’s ears free to listen out for traffic.
Called the Tunebug Shake, the device uses patented SurfaceSound technology to turn three-dimensional surfaces into what is in effect a surround sound speaker, which the company that has developed the technology, Silicon Valley Global, claims is safer than using headphones which it says isolate the rider from their environment.
According to the manufacturer, the Shake can be fitted to pretty much any type of bike helmet, although you have to admit that the so-called Gecko mount used to fit it to the skate-style helmet shown in the picture wins the aesthetic battle over the Velcro fastening needed to attach it to the vented-style helmet that road.cc users are more likely to own, if indeed they have a lid at all.
As shown in the video below from PhoneDog.com, the Shake can be used wirelessly via a Bluetooth connection to your phone or music player, and there’s also a different version of the device, the Vibe, which is suitable for use on any surface.
The device retails in the US for $99.99, although it’s currently out of stock on the Tunebug website. However, there doesn’t appear to be a UK distributor as yet – clicking on the ‘Europe’ tab on the website takes you through to a page written in German.
While the TuneBug may go some way towards resolving arguments over whether or not cyclists are taking a risk using headphones, the fact that it needs to be mounted on a helmet of course brings it squarely into that other eternal debate that’s never likely to be resolved one way or the other.
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
I cycle to work with headphones on, and hearing the traffic is not a problem, in fact its the other way round.
On the quite section along the canal I can hear the music and DJ's waffle OK, but when I get amongst the traffic I can only just hear the music over the traffic, and on busy sections forget the radio as it is totally drowned out by the traffic.
Admittedly I don't turn up the volume to compensate as I don't want to damage my ears, but it has shown me how much noise pollution there is from traffic.
I would suggest that it's not the wearing of earphones that is the issue, it's the volume of the music played. I'm an iPod wearer but only at volumes that do not drown out the sounds around me - in fact the faster I go, the less music I hear through wind-rush.
Maybe I'm too old, but I just don't understand why some people have the music up so loud that someone within 6 feet can hear it. Turning your helmet into a surround speaker, in my opinion, has the potential to put you in the same league and the Corsa and Saxo Drum-n-Bass crew, inflicting your musical tastes on anyone whose ears aren't already bleeding.
Not as dumb as wearing earbuds whilst cycling through the city (it's dangerous, ok).
This one again? Drivers use stereos and Lord knows how many other distracting devices, so to suggest that cyclists should somehow have to be unremittingly aware of what's going on around them is madness. Not only isn't it possible, but it's no way for us to say "It's Ok to cycle - actually you probably won't get killed just because you're on a bike!"
Listening to your MP3 player while cycling is perfectly acceptable and reasonable behaviour. If it were that dangerous, we'd ban anyone who's deaf from even getting on a bike! (I presume, of course, that you've got no statistics linking cycle deaths / injuries and music use?)
So in the event of an impact it could punch a speaker-shaped hole into your helmet and then into your skull? It's surprising that the issue of fitting devices such as helmet cams or lights to a helmet has attracted so litle comment.
Add new comment
7 comments
I cycle to work with headphones on, and hearing the traffic is not a problem, in fact its the other way round.
On the quite section along the canal I can hear the music and DJ's waffle OK, but when I get amongst the traffic I can only just hear the music over the traffic, and on busy sections forget the radio as it is totally drowned out by the traffic.
Admittedly I don't turn up the volume to compensate as I don't want to damage my ears, but it has shown me how much noise pollution there is from traffic.
Looks a bit rubbish if you ask me. You can get a lavod bike speaker, they look pretty good..but don't attach to thicker handlebars
I would suggest that it's not the wearing of earphones that is the issue, it's the volume of the music played. I'm an iPod wearer but only at volumes that do not drown out the sounds around me - in fact the faster I go, the less music I hear through wind-rush.
Maybe I'm too old, but I just don't understand why some people have the music up so loud that someone within 6 feet can hear it. Turning your helmet into a surround speaker, in my opinion, has the potential to put you in the same league and the Corsa and Saxo Drum-n-Bass crew, inflicting your musical tastes on anyone whose ears aren't already bleeding.
Personal audio should be just that - personal.
"And for that reason, I'm out"
BTW - you can buy them on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tunebug-Shake-Mobile-Mini-Bluetooth-Speaker-Players/dp/B003C16HWE/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1286885206&sr=8-2
Yet another way of being unsafe on the road and a danger to those around you. Wonderful!
Kooksville!
Not as dumb as wearing earbuds whilst cycling through the city (it's dangerous, ok).
V
This one again? Drivers use stereos and Lord knows how many other distracting devices, so to suggest that cyclists should somehow have to be unremittingly aware of what's going on around them is madness. Not only isn't it possible, but it's no way for us to say "It's Ok to cycle - actually you probably won't get killed just because you're on a bike!"
Listening to your MP3 player while cycling is perfectly acceptable and reasonable behaviour. If it were that dangerous, we'd ban anyone who's deaf from even getting on a bike! (I presume, of course, that you've got no statistics linking cycle deaths / injuries and music use?)
So in the event of an impact it could punch a speaker-shaped hole into your helmet and then into your skull? It's surprising that the issue of fitting devices such as helmet cams or lights to a helmet has attracted so litle comment.