The city of Cambridge, Massachusetts, this week passed a “first-of-its-kind” law obliging the city to add permanent segregated bike lanes whenever it carries out scheduled repairs on certain roads.
The Boston Globe reports that the rule does not apply to all roads – only those which have previously been identified to feature in the proposed 20-mile network of segregated lanes known as the Cambridge Bicycle Plan.
“With the Cycling Safety Ordinance, the Council codifies a lasting commitment to the users of our roadways that Cambridge intends to have a modern, safe, and accessible network of separated bicycle lanes for all residents regardless of their age or ability,” said the city’s mayor, Marc McGovern.
“This ordinance gives the bike plan teeth,” said Sam Feigenbaum, a volunteer with Cambridge Bicycle Safety, a local campaign group.
“The intent of the ordinance is that when the bike plan says a street needs a protected bike lane, that street will get a protected bike lane. That’s a huge step forward for the city.”
Feigenbaum said that previously when a street that was slated for improved cycling infrastructure came up for reconstruction, “a noisy minority of folks would complain, and the city would slide back on its commitment to putting in that lane.”
Now, when NIMBYs try to hold back new lanes, officials can override them by pointing to the law.
“It’s more of a long-term solution,” said Feigenbaum. “You’re not going to all of a sudden see a flood of protected bike lanes.”
Cambridge is a seven square mile city and he estimates only about a mile and a half of segregated cycle lanes will be built in the coming year. Nevertheless, the hope is that the whole of the Cambridge Bicycle Plan will be completed within five years.
Add new comment
7 comments
Well, if we've gone up to "rare" and allow financial restraints...
At least it puts the onus on them to demonstrate why they're not building them rather than having to make a case for building them.
We could do with something similar in the UK, but I'd be concerned that financial constraints would be the norm rather than the exception.
We do have something similar in the UK, the Welsh Active Travel Act, which mandates walking and cycling provision, but my friends in Wales assure me that nothing has changed and walking and cycling are consistently opposed and obstructed by vested interests.
I read about this somewhere yesterday. A point made in that article mentioned that there will be no need to add cycling provision in "exceptional circumstances". Hmmmm....
That might have been the link I posted in the forum: https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2019/04/protected-bike-lanes-traffic-safety-cambridge-bicycle-plan/586876/
Great idea. Can't see my local authority going for it, even if they do have policies which say exactly that already, they rarely, if ever, manage to carry them out. They'll put in a token section of cycle lane, but as far as decent provision goes, they just can't be bothered, and the policies are purely decorative.
I wonder if a local authority in this country would be brave enough to actually pass a law, and would it make any difference.
I wonder if any local authorities in this country would be brave enough to identify a coherent 20-mile long network of bike paths.