One of Great Britain's top up-and-coming prospects in cycling, Ethan Hayter, has signed for Team Ineos on a three-year contract.
The 21-year-old was previously a stagiaire at Team Sky at the end of the 2018 season and this year, riding for Great Britain, won stages of the Tour de l'Avenir and the Baby Giro.
His greatest successes to date have come on the track. He has won numerous titles at national level and above, and last year helped Great Britain win the team oursuit at the world championships, and also won the omnium at the European championships.
“It’s the best place for me to begin my career as a professional road rider and the best place for me to be with the Olympics coming up next year too," he said. "This team has lots of riders for me to take inspiration from and there’s so much young talent in the team as this season has shown."
He added: “The Baby Giro and Tour de l’Avenir are the biggest races at Under 23 level and I won stages in both of them so that was a massive confidence boost heading into the new season.
“At the Baby Giro I was sixth on one of the mountain stages so I was right up there on the climbs and the sprints, so I will have to discover which type of race suits me best. It means I can look at most race profiles and still have a go.”
Team principal Sir Dave Brailsford said: “Ethan is an exciting, young rider who has already had significant success at a more junior level. His signing is a further commitment to our long term-future as Team INEOS.
“We now have a really exciting group of young riders who all have the chance to compete and train with more senior and experienced teammates – and who can learn from them what it takes to win. Ethan is at a key stage of his professional development and we are all excited about what lies ahead for him as part of the Team.”
Add new comment
37 comments
Read my piece again. I was making a point about rhetoric being used to convince people into believing a danger that doesn't really exist. He does it because there's something about bicycles that riles up his fanboys. He likes causing conflict. Think Clarkson.
"Extremely dangerous". My arse. I'm not in favour of adults riding on narrow pavements or in busy pedestrianised areas, but this type of not-backed-up-by-reality, over-the-top rhetoric just helps drive a wedge between those who use bicycles and those who do not. How would I describe it? "A bit inconsiderate".
"A striking 80% of Dutch youth (age 12-17) cycle to places (school, park, shop, friend’s) at least three days per week."
Anyone know the figure for the UK? I imagine it's slightly less, like maybe 2%. A testament to our fantastic transport, health, climate change and community policies.
And probably a damned sight lower, if you exclude the kids cycling on the pavement. And that's NOT criticising the kids!
Not a day goes past when I DON'T see a kid cycling to/from school "treated" to terrifyingly aggressive driving ... FFS, no way should kids be expected to have the confidence and competence of a long-time, 50+ years, cyclist .
Firstly the Dutch figures are from at the least 5 years ago and as far back as 9 years as the survey data is from 2010-2014. I take the stats re cycling from DCE with a pinch of salt, the Dutch government released data that tells us that cycling has increased in km by circa 11% (but not journeys) over the last 9 years, at the same time motoring km have increased by a similar number (NL population increased by approx 5%). Modal share of cycling has not increased in over a decade despite the huge numbers of e-bikes in the last few years and many added thousands of km of cycle lanes. Strange how these numbers never seem to add up to more cycling yet the picture is portrayed completely differently!
Also according to that PDF and in the paragraph next to the cherry picked data is this.
"Data from TNO show that the percentage of children and youth meeting the Dutch Physical Activity Guideline (NNGB; to be at least moderately active for at least 60 minutes every day4) show a declining trend for the period between 2006 and 2014.5 For the 4-11 year olds the number of children who are meeting the NNGB has decreased by approximately 10 percent during this period. Furthermore, it seems that the Dutch adolescents are getting more inactive. For example, there was an increasing trend in the percentage of inactive (when a child is at most moderately physically active for 60 minutes in the span of only 2 days5) 12-17 year olds from 2010 (11%) to 2014 (15%).5 These numbers show the increment of the inactivity crisis among Dutch youth. This is a worrying development because of the negative health effects of being physically inactive.
And:
"Although Dutch children accumulate a lot of daily physical activity through cycling, it is not enough to meet the current national physical activity guidelines of 60 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity per day. Even though cycling is an important component to the amount of daily physical activity, Dutch youth are not cycling to health."
Less than a third of Dutch kids are meeting the daily physical threshold of 60 mins of moderate activity, children living in urban areas perform worse because the distance they travel by cycle is insufficient to get anywhere near the 60mins of physical activity.
To compare, the % of UK kids getting 60 mins moderate active exercise is 23%boys/20%girls so roughly 21.5% which is 6.5% less than the Dutch despite all these Dutch kids cycling loads, they much all be sitting playing playstations even more than out kids given how much cycling they do
Would we benefit more from allowing kids to cycle places without fear of getting smashed, yup, would the nation be healthier, absolutely, but let's not start cherry picking stats put up for the Dutch every time as a comparison when their underlying issues are the same as ours and aren't actually getting better despite their attempts to get more people cycling and the billions € which has failed massively.
“This understandably results in a large number of complaints to us. Cycling in pedestrian only areas is extremely dangerous...."
Great, so he'll be able to tell us how many complaints and how many people have been killed or seriously injured.
Edit:
Just read this fb post which sums the situation up brilliantly:
"Jeff Wagstaff Yeah, just think of all the lives that will be saved. Or is it the life. No, hang on, just think of all the minor annoyances that will be saved. I'm sure if it prevents one person from tutting, it'll be worth it."
If it's similar to the Velolife Cafe debacle, it will be one complaint, no record of numbers or a definition of what "extremely dangerous" is. Followed by a a group of NIMBY councillors who once got held up behind a club run taking vengence as only people with nothing else in their sorry lives can do.
Pages