A West London Conservative candidate at Thursday’s general election has been accused of hypocrisy over her opposition to Cycleway 9, which will run through the Brentford & Isleworth constituency she is standing in – with local cycling campaigners pointing out that the project was initiated by Prime Minister Boris Johnson when he was Mayor of London.
Seena Shah is standing for election in Brentford & Isleworth constituency won for Labour in 2010 by Ruth Cadbury with a majority of just 465 votes.
Cadbury, since 2010 co-chair of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group and who represented Labour at last week’s Active Travel Hustings at the Brompton Bicycle factory in nearby Greenford, was re-elected in 2017 with a majority of more than 12,000.
In a column last week for the Chiswick Herald, Shah accused Cadbury of being responsible for getting Cycleway 9, which will run from Olympia to Brentford, approved – even though the plans were drawn up by Transport for London (TfL) and the relevant local authorities, with the Labour-controlled Hounslow Council approving the section of the route running through the Brentford & Isleworth constituency.
The stretch running through Chiswick High Road has proved particularly contentious, led by Conservative councillors representing wards in the area, the most affluent in the borough, leading opposition to the scheme which was finally approved after revisions were put to a second consultation.
Shah wrote: “I believe that Brentford and Isleworth has regressed under a Labour MP, a Labour Mayor and Labour council.
“Under Ruth Cadbury, Chiswick has seen the Cycleway 9 cycle path approved along our busiest road, putting pedestrians at risk and jeopardising our already struggling retail economy by removing pavement space, as well as parking and loading bays.”
Initial construction will start at the north end of Kew Bridge this Thursday, polling day, and Shah also expressed concerns that works will go ahead at a time when Hammersmith Bridge remains closed, claiming that there would be a “consequential increase in traffic at residential and main roads throughout Chiswick.”
She added: “If elected, I pledge to call for an immediate delay and review of Cycleway 9 and ensure a temporary bridge is put up to replace Hammersmith Bridge, a project that would cost £5 million and only take three months to complete.”
Shah also pledged her continued support for the UK to leave the European Union, saying that “52 per cent of the United Kingdom voted to Leave. Whether you personally like it or not, that is a democratic majority and we are a democratic country. It is the job of any democratic government to deliver on the will of the people.”
The initial consultation to Cycleway 9 in the individual wards within the Borough of Hounslow, by comparison, had between 59 and 63 per cent of responses in favour and between 20 and 38 per cent opposed, by comparison.
Michael Robinson, co-ordinator at Hounslow Cycling Campaign, told road.cc: “It doesn’t look like Seena Shah gets the irony of complaining about Labour politicians for Cycleway 9 given the scheme was funded and planned when the current Prime Minister Boris Johnson was Mayor of London.
“Cycleway 9 is a good example of cross party consensus at the mayoral level as it was initiated by the previous Conservative Mayor and progressed by the current Labour Mayor,” he continued.
“The government’s Committee on Climate Change is clear that safe cycling infrastructure is an important part of the transition to a low carbon economy.
“It is very disappointing that Seena Shah is attempting to politicise a non-polluting mode of transport,” he added.
“We hope this is because she is being misinformed by local councillors rather than it reflecting her own views,” he added.
Add new comment
68 comments
Fact- Check: Actually Corbyn fibbed about sitting down to watch the Queens Speech on a Christmas morning in his interview with Julia Etchingham.
On the other hand, BoJo told a whopper to Her Maj when he prorogued parliament.
I'm no fan of Corbyn, but I will take him over Johnson (who should be lying dead in a ditch anyway if he kept his promises) any day.
I didn't understand that one at all - in this Modern Age, would it have been so awful (would anyone have cared) if JC had simply admitted he didn't watch it? I know I don't.
(That said, who advised Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson that it was best to sidestep and steal a phone - "What picture? On what phone?" - rather than simply admitting it was awful and he'd promise to look into it...?).
He probably thought it up himself, like the idea of denying a hospital visit was a press opportunity by saying "there's no press here" while standing in front of the press camera crew he had invited.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/boris-johnson-hospital-nh...
The Tories also have the worst active transport policies of the major parties.
Fact checking Fact Check; He didn't say christmas morning, he said morning, so it is entirely possible that he watched it the next day in the morning. It's always good when fact checking that you use the actual facts, not the alternative facts made up by the tories.
No lie - I corrected that for you.
Not really a big lie though was it? Not like lying to the queen, lying to both of his ex wives or being sacked twice for lying. Read what Max Hastings says about Boris Johnson. And bear in mind, Max Hastings was a friend of Boris Jonson and remains a true blue Tory.
How many kids does he have, again, and by whom?
And mobile phone thieves
Pages