- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Justice (Lonpicman, Wikimedia Commons)Suffolk magistrates fail to see funny side of cyclist who rode naked through speed check
A man who cycled naked through a community speed watch in Suffolk has been given an 18-month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £500 costs.
Alexander Purser, aged 23, who works at Suffolk Ski Centre, was driving through the village of Acton near Sudbury last June when he "spotted a community speed watch group in a lay-by on the side of the road," reports The Sudbury Mercury.
After reaching his home, he took his clothes off and got on his bike, wearing nothing more than his glasses and trainers and rode back to the speed trap, saying afterwards that he "wanted to see if he could reach 30 miles and hour on his bike naked while travelling through the speed trap".
Last month, he told Bury St Edmunds Magistrates' Court: "I thought it would be fun, both for me and the people manning the speed watch."
Some locals failed to see the funny side, however, with calls made to the police regarding the naked cyclist, who was riding close to the village school.
One, Brenda Bailey, told the court: "There are a lot of young children in that village and I am sure they wouldn't want to see somebody cycling naked."
Another witness, Wayne Bird, said: "I saw a male on a bike with absolutely nothing on, not even a pair of socks. It was like he was having a slow stroll on his bike. I found it very disgusting, knowing all the children were just about to come home from school."
Police visited Purser at his home, where he admitted being the naked cyclist and claimed he had checked his watch before setting out to make sure that pupils hadn’t left school yet, saying that it would have been "totally inappropriate" to have performed his ride with children on the streets.
Appearing for Purser, Paul Booty told the court that the defendant had not meant to cause alarm or distress, telling magistrates that the episode “was a jolly good wheeze - marvelllous fun.”
That view was shared by 61-year-old Vincent Humphries, co-ordinator of the speed watch group, who said: "It's not every day you see something like that. I was laughing. It didn't offend me at all."
Magistrates, however, disagreed, ruling that it was "likely Purser was aware his actions would have caused alarm or distress."
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
Latest Comments
- chrisonabike 2 sec ago
Don't mention them!!
- brooksby 7 min 7 sec ago
Uuurrrgh Uuurrath Aaah Mumble Mumble Mumble Cyclists mumble mumble, uuuurrrrgh mumble uuurrgh, lycra, mumble mumble <cough> uuaarr mumble...
- Rendel Harris 12 min 41 sec ago
Absolutely, so many of them quite clearly have chosen the job because they get to wear a uniform and a stab vest and carry a walkie-talkie so they...
- brooksby 14 min 4 sec ago
So the footpath has always been there too? Doesn't Cllr Lake think its a problem that motorists are apparently pulling out of the garage forecourt...
- Muddy Ford 17 min 55 sec ago
Would the cutting down of the hedge then enable another access road to the new estate, so do it under the guise of 'active travel'? I agree with...
- David9694 41 min 46 sec ago
Bus hits house as snow causes travel disruption and shuts schools across Yorkshire...
- Carmic0 2 hours 34 min ago
Nice to see the Passoni with external cabling.
- mark1a 7 hours 15 min ago
Yes, I agree, and thanks for replying, what I was trying to say (badly) was that Look wasn't really a bike company back then. ...
- George Hill 11 hours 18 min ago
Foxcote Hill in Ilmington - it's steep, it's not too long, and once you get to the top you can see the for miles across the Cotswolds....
- stonojnr 11 hours 26 min ago
well at least they didnt go for British Racing Green as well ,as then theyd have two trademark licensing cases up against them....
Add new comment
17 comments
My kids would've been laughing. A lot of the kids round our way would've started chucking stones at the bloke. Who needs protecting?
£500 costs, thats about 350 more than the going rate for killing a cyclist in a time trial, two similar cases last season refer.
I'd like to know what he was charged with as being naked in public is not a criminal offence. If you can be charged with offending someone then I should be complaining to the police every time I go out as there are plenty of people who offend me by just being generally stupid and inconsiderate - particularly old people who think the sight of a naked person is offensive.
The link to the original article from the Sudbury Mercury states that he was "convicted of using threatening words or behaviour, likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress". As other have stated, simple nudity is not an offence, but this tin pot magistrate seems to have found a tenuous connection to a common law offence.
They forgot to mention what he used to indicate
It was inappropriate whether or not there were children nearby.
Nevertheless, a £500 fine, 18 month discharge? Good Lord - you'd think he'd run someone down and killed them whilst on his phone ...
why inappropriate?
Riding around stark naked is likely to offend the sensibilities of old ladies and Daily Fail readers. Children are most likely to point and laugh, I would have thought.
But hundreds of the buggers doing it through Brighton is perfectly acceptable and given a police escort!
Certainly made the union conference I was at at the time a little more interesting.
What's wrong with offending the sensibilites of people who are that narrow minded and screwed up? Sensibilities like that need offending, it's almost a duty. Why should the rest of us have to suffer for barmy repressed fearful old gits like this?
There are on the whole more sane people on here than sitting on magistrates' benches or operating the speed checks. What's wrong with children seeing a bare bum? Or willy? As has been said, they'd think it was a right laugh, they're not yet as screwed up as these old gits. Get a life, ff's sake.
Nah, motorists who run down and kill people only get about a £50 fine, a few hours unpaid work and a smack on the wrist. Inappropriate, Hmm i don't know. A bit odd maybe but no harm done. A £500 fine, jesus c'mon! Drivers don't get that for the most heinous driving offenses
in fact.. .That view was shared by 61-year-old Vincent Humphries, co-ordinator of the speed watch group, who said: "It's not every day you see something like that. I was laughing. It didn't offend me at all."
It's the spin put on the article which worries me. It mentions him close to a school, i mean what has that got to do with it unless they are trying to insinuate some kind of inappropriate act with kids. That's slanderous if nothing else. Well, he won't do that again will he
It's not.
"...not even a pair of socks" lol - tool
can I retract on the grounds of grammatical errors, the shame, the shame!
so was he charged with speeding or being naked.
it is a real worry that anyone can have children, there should be some kind IQ test before they are allowed to procreate. Yes they are so right the human body is disgusting and shameful, and anyone naked must of course be raging pervert, theses people and their mindset are the real worry in society. If someone wants to run round in the nod good luck to them, I would be more concerned by road rash.
naked. Speed limits apply only to motor vehicles and community speed watch can't penalise speeders anyway.