Cyclists in Peterborough riding without lights, or with red lights attached to the front rather than the rear of their bicycles, are “causing a danger for motorists,” according to the Evening Telegraph’s website, Peterborough Today.
The claim is made in an article highlighting a police campaign running over the next fortnight to make bike riders aware of the need to be visible after dark. From next month, cyclists failing to display lights will receive a £30 on the spot fine.
While ensuring that all cyclists display lights is an objective we fully support, a study published two years ago based on an analysis of Department for Transport road casualty statistics and the police reports that provide the raw data found that cyclists riding without lights was a factor in just 2 per cent of incidents resulting in serious injury to bike riders; it also found that cyclists were not to blame in 93 per cent of the incidents analysed.
Nevertheless, the newspaper’s message that it’s the occupants of cars that need protecting is a theme sadly picked up in some of the comments, with predictable calls for cyclists to be licensed and pay ‘road tax.’
Police, too, seem to be highlighting the danger posed to car drivers by unlit cyclists, rather than expressing any concern for the safety of bike riders themselves.
PC Steve Godfrey, described in the article as a keen cyclist, said: “It is definitely getting worse. The biggest problem is people not riding with any lights, but the issue of putting them on the wrong way round is one of our biggest concerns.
“If you are driving a car and see a white light in front of you, you think it is a cyclist coming towards you. That is particularly dangerous at junctions.
“The driver could misjudge the space and it could end up being very dangerous,” he continued.
“Up until the end of the month we are giving advice to cyclists about what they should do, because a lot of it is that they just don’t know the law.
“A lot of people say ‘it’s all right, I’m just on the pavement’, but that is still illegal.
“After that we will be giving them £30 on-the-spot fines. Of course, if their lack of appropriate lighting causes an accident the punishment could be a lot worse.” PC Godfrey added.
The newspaper adds that cyclists in Peterborough who purchase bike lights at certain local bike shops during November will receive a 10 per cent discount upon mentioning the words, ‘Cambridgeshire Police.”
Those shops are Bristows (Orton Longueville), Marstons (Whittlesey), Greenwheel Cycles (Fengate), Woodston Cycles (Oundle Road), On Yer Bike (Lincoln Rd) and Richardsons (Queensgate).
PC Godfrey added: “All the shops tell people how to properly fit the lights, and some even do it for them at no extra cost.”
Clair George, road safety officer for the SaferPeterborough partnership, commented: “All road users are at risk of not being seen as the dark nights draw in. People are often hurt in crashes simply because they are not easily visible.
“The problem is worse in winter, as heavy rain and fog and shorter daylight hours cause poor visibility.”
Add new comment
34 comments
I read the article on the newspaper site and didn't think it sounded like you...
However I do think the 2% is as close to accurate as you can get for any data being broken down. Its also only a small part in what is always an on-going data collection by both your Force and other agencies/parties.
If it does say one thing its this: somehow the antisocials manage to avoid getting hit by cars, certainly in that section studied.
I'm happy for any Ninja Cyclist to get fined, bike taken off them, etc (can they not do a sect. 58? Is it?), its the anti crap we need to have stopped though. There's no recognition in these places of the many good cyclists, they get the flak for the plums who ride Ninja.
Is it really illegal to ride without lights on the pavement? I didn't know that. In fact sometimes when I haven't got a light I ride on shared use pavement/cyclepath and assumed it was OK. After all it's not on the road. What about the alternative of down the canal towpath (also a cyclepath) and through the woods on the common? Surely that's not illegal.
What is the actual law / highway code statement on this?
Will the polis be dishing lights out to peds as well. Afterall, they go around wearing dark clothes and move around randomly Also, the photo does show the architypical offender - a budget full suspension mountainbike on the pavement. the middle one also appears to be using a pelican crossing. Will they receive a court summons (max fine of £1000) as well as the FPN
Yeah, cyclists do pose a major threat to motorists. Colliding with a cyclist could leave a nasty scratch on the paintwork, imagine that?
I noted three cars on my commute to work that had broken headlights or tail-lights. I don't see an papers calling for a crackdown on these. One also had a severely flat reay tyre and was being driven by a woman texting while at the wheel. So just who is the more dangerous?
Pages