- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Tubeless valves
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Justice (Lonpicman, Wikimedia Commons)Killer driver sentenced to 10 years and 6 months for deaths of Bristol tandem couple
Disqualified driver Nicholas Lovell, 38, was today jailed at Bristol Crown Court for 10 years and six months and banned from driving for life for killing husband and wife Ross, 34, and Clare Simons, 30, when he crashed into them as they rode their tandem bike while he was trying to get away from a police car.
Lovell, who last month pleaded guilty to causing the death by dangerous driving of the young married couple initally fled the scene of the incident which took place in Hanham on the outskirts of Bristol, on the 27th of January this year.
He handed himself in to a Bristol police station on the night of the incident - police had already tracked down the vehicle he was driving, a Citroen Picasso belonging to 35 year old, Louise Cox who was a passenger in the car when Lovell hit Ross and Clare Simons. Cox, was subsequently found guilty of attempting to pervert the course of justice, after she gave the police a false name and description of the driver, she was sentenced to 12 months.
Prior to the incident, a police officer had signalled for the vehicle to stop, but Lovell failed to do so. The officer lost sight of the Citroen, which then struck another vehicle before hitting and killing Mr and Mrs Simons - the couple were killed instantly by the collision.
Initial reports were that the police were involved in a pursuit of the vehicle, but police subsequently confirmed that was not the case. The incident was referred to the Independent Police Complaints Commission, but was later referred back to Avon & Somerset Constabulary to investigate.
Speaking after Lovell's trial Detective Chief Inspector Rachel Williams said: "This collision was caused by Nicholas Lovell, a disqualified driver who got behind the wheel of the car and drove at speed, before losing control and striking the couple while they cycled.
"Nicholas Lovell then ran away from the scene in a bid to escape, leaving behind Louise Cox who then deliberately and callously set out to mislead police at the scene.
"The pleas entered today by both Nicholas Lovell and Louise Cox reflect that both have taken some responsibility for the deaths of Ross and Clare.
"While these pleas will never bring Ross and Clare back, I hope they go some way to providing comfort for their families."
road.cc's founder and first editor, nowadays to be found riding a spreadsheet. Tony's journey in cycling media started in 1997 as production editor and then deputy editor of Total Bike, acting editor of Total Mountain Bike and then seven years as editor of Cycling Plus. He launched his first cycling website - the Cycling Plus Forum at the turn of the century. In 2006 he left C+ to head up the launch team for Bike Radar which he edited until 2008, when he co-launched the multi-award winning road.cc - finally handing on the reins in 2021 to Jack Sexty. His favourite ride is his ‘commute’ - which he does most days inc weekends and he’s been cycle-commuting since 1994. His favourite bikes are titanium and have disc brakes, though he'd like to own a carbon bike one day.
Latest Comments
- HLaB 1 sec ago
I wanted a Lezyne micro drive 800+ and the KTV Drive was in the package. Its bright and seems to be eye catching on my commute but as with my...
- Rendel Harris 37 min 18 sec ago
That statement is not borne out by any comparison times between the two on significant Tour or training climbs or time trials, Pogacar is faster...
- Dunnoeither 1 hour 24 min ago
Thankfully no one here lives in a country with a history of colonialism, slavery or a corrupt financial industry (the list goes on)so we can point...
- Mr Blackbird 4 hours 7 min ago
I agree. The officials probably earn a pittance or just get paid expenses. They do what they do for love of the sport. Without them the sport would...
- ubercurmudgeon 3 hours 33 min ago
Those rainbow bands look more like plaid at that speed.
- Hirsute 5 hours 25 min ago
Oxford from Emily Kerr "Anyone know anything about the THIRD major smash up on Iffley Rd in my ward in a year? "
- Miller 6 hours 41 min ago
It may not be as bad as made out but it's not great. In fact it is frustrating because bits of it are actually quite good but it repeatedly does...
Add new comment
13 comments
I’ve got a very good idea that would stop him driving again its called ‘Life Imprisonment’.
Step in the right direction?? As ‘Georgee’ says six months for killing two cyclists and ten years for running from the police.
Good result on the sentence but a raspberry for our local MP Chris Skidmore. In the wake of the killing he promised to look at getting traffic calming measures installed on that stretch of road, which might not have saved this couple's life, but would make it a hell of a lot safer to cycle there. I emailed him and haven't even received a response.
A Step In The Right Direction??
Maybe??
10, years and 6, months is a wee bit lenient for killing two people. 20, years would have been more appropriate for such a terrible crime.
Good news.Would have preferred 10 years per life as he'll be out in 2018 but at least he won't be driving a car again. Maybe he can start riding a bike.
Restored my faith in the justice system. Partially.
I just wonder if, with modern technology a banned driver might be required to carry a Garmin style monitor/transmitter which recorded their movements. It would highlight when they were moving along a road, and if this was at a speed above the local limit. At any time the movement could be called in for audit, and if the banned person was found to be driving a period of greater curfew imposed. The audit might be relatively simple - any recorded journey not made by public transport, or on foot/cycle would be 'visible' from the record of locations/speeds, and verification of who the motor vehicle driver was required.
Any vehicle being used by a banned driver, whether they owned it or not could be impounded, and unless clear extenuating conditions exist, destroyed (so no 'friends' might be tempted to 'lend' a banned driver a car).
So they banned a previously disqualified driver for life?? That should stop him driving when he gets out in 5 years. Pathetic.
And what are they supposed to do to stop him driving again ? I would imagine that he will drive again when he is out, but this is the court, all they can do is hand down a sentence, they are not the police.
10 years is actually pretty long sentence for a non murder, I've read far too many reports of drivers getting no custodial sentences for killing riders, this is a step in the right direction, now we need to keep up the pressure to get harsher sentences and applied consistently across all courts.
In light of the passenger deception and guilty of perverting the course of justice, knowing full well the facts, she too should have received a heftier sentence.
Finally a case where a driver gets an appropriate sentence for killing ciclyst(s), but ...
One thing bothers me.
It seems that when an allege police pursuit of a vehicule has letal consequences, suddenly, facts get "corrected" after an inquiry. It no longer involves a pursuit. Particulary if the reason(s) motivating the pursuit do not support putting innocent lives at risk.
We have had a similar case in Canada.
A harsh sentence is also another element that is factored in to give an impression of justice and avoid rasing question about the behaviour and potential partial responsibility of the police.
I suspect the 6 months was for killing two cyclists and the 10 years for not stopping for the police and running away.
Better than most but 10 years for a double killing?
stick a zero on the end maybe!