Support road.cc

Like this site? Help us to make it better.

Boris Johnson says he'd back ban on cyclists wearing earphones

Mayor of London also suggests HGV rush hour ban urged by Chris Boardman wouldn't work...

Mayor of London Boris Johnson has said that he would support a ban on bike riders in London wearing earphones – leading one commentator to suggest that his credibility with cyclists “is evaporating.” In an interview with BBC Radio London’s Vanessa Feltz, Mr Johnson also appeared to downplay calls led by British Cycling’s Chris Boardman for London to ban lorries at peak hours.

The Mayor told Ms Feltz that Transport for London (TfL), which he chairs, regularly discusses the issue of cyclists and pedestrians using handheld electronic devices.

He described earphones used by people to listen to music while riding bikes as “and absolute scourge,” and said he would be in favour of banning them.

Boris Johnson paying close attention to the traffic
Boris Johnson paying close attention to the traffic

Mr Johnson continued: “Call me illiberal, but it makes me absolutely terrified to see them bowling along unable to hear the traffic.

"You've got to be able to hear that car behind you or about to come out of the road in front of you," he added.

It’s an issue Mr Johnson has addressed before.

In a 2011 reply at Mayor’s Question Time when the Green Party’s Jenny Jones quizzed him about pedestrian casualties in London, including children, he said: “I am afraid I see too many cyclists with iPods, earphones in both ears, which I think is wrong. I do not agree with that. I am worried.

“Speaking as one who cycles all over London, I see a lot of people using handhelds, using BlackBerry devices and not paying proper attention to the road.”

However, one photo circulated widely on Twitter and Facebook on Tuesday showed Mr Johnson himself using a handheld mobile phone while cycling.

In an article for the Guardian, Peter Walker, who regularly writes its Bike Blog, said: “What credibility Boris Johnson had with London's cyclists… is evaporating. Six cyclists have died on London's roads in just under two weeks. All but one were killed by lorries, coaches or buses. The mayor's reaction? To talk about headphones.”

What isn’t clear is whether Mr Johnson might be in possession of information suggesting that one or more of the six cyclists killed in London within the past fortnight may have been using headphones, and if so, whether police believe it may have been a contributory factor.

Meanwhile, British Cycling policy advisor Chris Boardman addressed an open letter to Mr Johnson on Tuesday in which he urged the Mayor to ban lorries from London’s roads at peak times.

In his letter, the former world and Olympic champion and wearer of the Tour de France yellow jersey says:

When I rode alongside you to help you launch your vision for cycling in March this year, you made a verbal promise to look at the successful experiences of Paris and many other cities in restricting the movements of heavy vehicles during peak hours.

Also, in the document, the Mayor’s Vision for Cycling in London (2013), you state: ‘In consultation with business, we will study the experience from cities such as Paris and Dublin, where lorries over a certain size are restricted from certain parts of the city or at certain times of the day.’

There have now been six cycling fatalities on the capital’s roads in two weeks and a total of 14 so far in 2013. HGVs were involved in nine of the fatal crashes – that’s 64% of the fatalities – despite making up less than 5% of traffic. In Paris last year [sic] there were zero cyclist fatalities.

British Cycling is disappointed that, eight months later, nothing has been announced on progressing this. Now is the time to make the tough and critical decisions necessary to achieve your vision – without that, more lives will be put at risk.

Paris is a safer place to ride a bike and we believe that this is, at least in part, due to the restrictions on dangerous vehicles entering the city during peak hours. London has an opportunity to emulate and surpass Paris and to lead the way for the other ambitious cycling cities across Britain. Let’s not waste this opportunity to do something now. The longer we delay, the more lives will be lost.

Improving HGV safety is a key aspect of our road safety manifesto. My colleagues at British Cycling are willing to help on this matter in whatever way they can. Do let us know if we can be of any assistance.

I would welcome an update on how this matter is progressing at City Hall.

During his interview with Ms Feltz, however, while acknowledging that there needed to be a "much bigger conversation about HGVs" and the risks they present to cyclists, Mr Johnson seemed to distance himself from a complete ban at certain times of the day.

He said that introducing such restrictions could lead to a "serious influx as soon as the ban is over," and thereby increase the danger for cyclists and other vulnerable road users travelling outside rush hour.

As for that statistic quoted by Boardman that no cyclists were killed in Paris “last year” – in fact, it relates to 2011 – it is an attention-grabbing one, regularly invoked to support calls for a restriction on movements on lorries similar to those in the French capital; however, it does need to be put into context.

For a start, the French statistics relate to the area covered by the Prefecture of Police of Paris, which covers 762 square kilometres; Greater London, for comparison, covers 1,572 square kilometres.

Secondly, even the Prefecture of Police of Paris points out that 2011 was unusual, with a spokesman quoted by the website 20minutes.fr earlier this year as saying “it was truly an exceptional year because since 2007 we generally see between two and six deaths [of cyclists] a year on the roads.”

In 2012, five cyclists lost their lives while riding their bikes in the area covered by the Prefecture, including Philippe Le Men, a cycling journalist with L’Equipe, killed by a lorry as he rode to work at the sports daily’s offices.

You can find more thoughts on that zero casualties in 2011 statistic in this blog post published in September last year by Buffalo Bill, who founded the Moving Target ezine.

One other startling statistic from Paris is that in 2012, there were 39 people killed in road traffic incidents in the city, 18 of them pedestrians; the same year, in that area of Greater London that is a little over twice the size, there were 134 road traffic fatalities, of whom 69 were pedestrians.

Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.

Add new comment

74 comments

Avatar
northstar replied to mattsccm | 11 years ago
0 likes
mattsccm wrote:

Some sense, some balls.
Headphones have no place and no need. They do hinder awareness. To my mind they should be considered like lights. if you are wearing them and have an accident they have to be considered. As lights are compulsory during darkness. Its a law. I think that as with cars , cycle lights should be mandatory during poor conditions.
There is no reason not to. If cyclists want to be considered equal to cars then they should lay by the rules.
Talking about others, eg pedestrians, is just diverting attention from an issue that you personally don't like. Its a different issue. I agree that it may be valid but its a different issue.
Good point about a rush once the HGV ban is over but maybe you city dwellers have to live with that.
Everyone just has to accept that lorries, cars and bikes are just not good bed fellows.

All hail the motorist! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.

Avatar
CarlosFerreiro | 11 years ago
0 likes

Surely the mechanism for appropriate HGV use already exists?
As they are all on commercial journeys there should already be a risk assessment of their trip, considering the time, route, equipment used and other mitigation that may be required to make that a safe journey.
Any serious incident and the HSE should be having a look at whether the RA was appropriate, if it was followed, and the various responsibilities within the companies - operator and client.

Avatar
kitkat | 11 years ago
0 likes

Good input from Mr Boardman, shame about Paris stat being out but good reporting by road.cc, thanks for highlighting it

Avatar
pz1800 | 11 years ago
0 likes

Boris has evidently got what he wants from cyclists, so now we can piss off and die. Is anyone surprised? He is a Tory politician = a lying, opportunistic bastard who, in the end, will side with industry.
I am not a London cyclist, even a UK cyclist, but I was before the days of cycling super highways and insane London construction.

Avatar
Initialised | 11 years ago
0 likes

So are we going to ban car radios, voiced sat nav devices from cars and personal stereos from pedestrians on shared use bike paths. The same logic applies.

Avatar
jasecd replied to Initialised | 11 years ago
0 likes
Initialised wrote:

So are we going to ban car radios, voiced sat nav devices from cars and personal stereos from pedestrians on shared use bike paths. The same logic applies.

You should add near silent electric/hybrid cars to that list. Going by this logic Boris should also discriminate against deaf drivers, pedestrians and cyclists as well.

Avatar
maldin replied to Initialised | 11 years ago
0 likes

double post

Avatar
maldin replied to Initialised | 11 years ago
0 likes
Initialised wrote:

So are we going to ban car radios, voiced sat nav devices from cars and personal stereos from pedestrians on shared use bike paths. The same logic applies.

Exactly what I was wondering. To that you can add the fact that car drivers should have their radios off and all windows wound down, ban on hands free phones, all so that drivers can better hear what is around them? What a load of rubbish. The simply fact is that if you want to increase your survival odds as a cyclist, take as many precautions as possible including making yourself visible, not blocking out surrouding noises etc, but those can only go so far in an environment where the actual threat itself (motorised vehicles) is not being better managed, often is indifferent to cyclist safety and in some cases is blatantly agressive towards them (I am still staggered that the police would act if I walked down a road taking swipes at pedestrians with my baseball bat, yet seem not to be bothered by motorists doing the same with their cars to cyclists). I was fully aware of the presence of the car that hit me from behind whilst illegally over taking (though technically, as they didn't cross the centre line, they didn't overtake, they merely squeezed past me at 50mph), but that didn't stop him hitting me and continuing to drive, perhaps not even realising he had swiped me numous times with his caravan (and no, I didn't go to the police because I had nothing except the colour of the car to go on, so what's the point? I was too busy trying not to go under his caravan or the following cars' wheels to notice the reg no.). If Borris thinks this is the way to create safer streets, then he appears to have his priorities wrong, unless his priorities are based on ease of enforcement rather than life saving changes, in which case he is bang on the money.

Avatar
jasecd | 11 years ago
0 likes

Well done Boris - deciding policy based on anecdotal evidence and in the case of HGV's, putting private profits before individual safety.

This is nothing to do with cyclist safety but obsequious pandering to the type of non-cyclists who desperately want to see cycling controlled in whatever fashion possible as they seek some sort of deluded moral equivalency. The same people who equate RLJ's with dangerous driving.

Boris never had any credibility to me - his flagship cycling projects were more about column inches and corporate sponsorship than a genuine promotion of cycling. It's clear that the cycling super highways aren't fit for purpose and are often poorly thought out and implemented. He would rather be seen to be doing the right thing than actually do the right thing.

All of us who ride regularly can tell you what the problem is - unsafe driving. If you want these deaths to end then you need to tackle it head on. Instead Boris and the Met give us this victim blaming bullshit.

Avatar
Ush replied to jasecd | 11 years ago
0 likes
jasecd wrote:

All of us who ride regularly can tell you what the problem is - unsafe driving. If you want these deaths to end then you need to tackle it head on. Instead Boris and the Met give us this victim blaming bullshit.

No more needs to be said really.

We don't need:

* headphone bans
* flourescent clown clothes
* polystyrene faith-based headgear
* HGVs banned from the roads

We just need the police present stopping and arresting the habitual law-breakers that are killing themselves and the rest of us.

Avatar
Jimbonic replied to Ush | 11 years ago
0 likes
Ush wrote:
jasecd wrote:

All of us who ride regularly can tell you what the problem is - unsafe driving. If you want these deaths to end then you need to tackle it head on. Instead Boris and the Met give us this victim blaming bullshit.

No more needs to be said really.

We don't need:

* headphone bans
* flourescent clown clothes
* polystyrene faith-based headgear
* HGVs banned from the roads

We just need the police present stopping and arresting the habitual law-breakers that are killing themselves and the rest of us.

Yes.

And in the intervening twelfty hundred years, I shall continue to not wear ear/headphones, make myself visible, wear a helmet (agree this will not help me in the event of having to resist the weight of a large motorised vehicle, but it hurts less if I hit the road) and avoid putting myself in the way of other vehicles.

Avatar
Ush replied to Jimbonic | 11 years ago
0 likes
Jimbonic wrote:

I shall continue to not wear ear/headphones, make myself visible, wear a helmet (agree this will not help me in the event of having to resist the weight of a large motorised vehicle, but it hurts less if I hit the road) and avoid putting myself in the way of other vehicles.

Good for you. Anything else about your private life that you'd like to share?

Avatar
Jimbonic replied to Ush | 11 years ago
0 likes
Ush wrote:
Jimbonic wrote:

I shall continue to not wear ear/headphones, make myself visible, wear a helmet (agree this will not help me in the event of having to resist the weight of a large motorised vehicle, but it hurts less if I hit the road) and avoid putting myself in the way of other vehicles.

Good for you. Anything else about your private life that you'd like to share?

Thank you.

What sort of details were you after?

Avatar
racyrich | 11 years ago
0 likes

Headphones? Utter piffle.

The HGV ban is a non-starter. Working where I do off Fenchurch St I'd say most of the lorries are construction lorries. Their journeys can't be made in the evenings unless building work is to become a nocturnal activity. That'll go down well. Even limiting them from rush hours would put a massive dent in the building operations.
Paris doesn't have the same problem as it has a 7 storey limit on building height, so there's no point in demolishing office blocks every 25 years and replacing them with a sparklier new model.

Pages

Latest Comments