I’m not really one to take joy in saying ‘Told you so,’ but hey, told you so…
Last week, we reported on our blog about the new smart, AI-powered sensors being tested in a set of traffic lights in Solihull meant to prioritise cyclists over drivers, with Ryan specifically asking y’all “don’t tell the Telegraph”. But as fate would have it, someone did tell the Telegraph, and here we are, with another comment/infernal diatribe about the “small, angry minority”, otherwise known as cyclists.
> Psst… Don’t tell the Telegraph: New AI-powered sensor technology being tested on key cycle route in Solihull to give cyclists “smoother, uninterrupted journey” through traffic lights and “greater priority” over motorists
Let’s not beat around the bush, as the writer gets straight into his angst and desperations about the ‘war on motorists’ straight away, lamenting that his brand new car “slams on the brakes when it spots a 30mph sign” on roads — I mean, as one would expect the driver to do so, anyway? “It’s obvious that drivers are given a hard time, even by their own cars,” Clive Aslet, author of the piece, writes.
“Solihull’s innovation is bound to cause upset among the many motorists who already think that Lycra-wearing speed merchants rule the roost,” he adds. “They’re not gracious about their favoured status, either. Expect a torrent of foul-mouthed abuse if you innocently chance to get in their way.
“Don’t think I’m anti-bicycle. I used to ride one myself and loved it. The hobby only abruptly ceased when the last of my vehicles was stolen from outside my house, despite the fact that it had only cost me £10.
“I only occasionally return to the joy of the activity, so rich in memories of childhood, when cautiously pedalling a TfL hireling to St Bartholomew’s the Great – God, I hope, will protect me from the manifest dangers of crossing London by this means, most of which come from two-wheeled, fast-moving urban warriors in helmets who have little patience with a Womble like me.”
I see, getting a few boxes ticked there right out the gate.
> Press regulator rules Telegraph breached Editors' Code with inaccurate claim cyclists hit 52mph chasing London Strava segments
But then Aslet harkens back to his chief bother, the final straw in the “war on motorists”, the implementation of the AI-traffic lights. The sensors, developed by VivaCity, have been installed by Transport for West Midlands (TfWM) and Solihull Council at a toucan crossing near Blythe Valley, and they are able to detect cyclists 20 to 30 metres away, with the early detection enabling the traffic signals to go green quicker, “giving cyclists a smoother, uninterrupted journey on their bikes”.
Aslet, a writer on British architecture and life and a Visiting Professor at the University of Cambridge, says that he’s fine with “civic acts” such as reducing traffic and carbon emissions as long as they benefit a wider community. But by his own admission, “cycling is by necessity a niche mode of transportation.”
“The vast majority of people intending to travel outside of highly urbanised areas rely on their cars. Privileging a small minority of hobbyists at the expense of everyone else seems to be a prime example of the finger-wagging war on motorists waged across Britain by council and transport officials,” he adds.
But it seems that the memo from TfWM about the traffic lights being a part of a trial to accurately detect the sort of user approaching the crossing at varying speeds, and a part of a broader effort to promote active travel by offering them priority over motorists, seems to have been lost by the writer, who instead paints a picture as the AI will make the traffic lights transform into evil, death machines, stomping and crushing every car that comes by and banishing their users to a dystopian wasteland.
> Greater Manchester to roll out ‘smart’ junctions prioritising cyclists and pedestrians
He ends the column with a subtle call to arms: “The unfairness of preferring one group over another is riling. More transparency, please, or feelings will over-boil.”
So if I get it right, he’s agitated about the “unfairness of preferring one group over another” and asking for “more transparency”… Seems like we’re in agreement then!
Add new comment
45 comments
Not sure it's anything to do with it being about women, I just don't think they wanted to start the day off on a feel good story...doesn't generate the clicks does it...they'd rather get their audience riled up in that tabloid fashion that they're so good at.
That Torygraph piece made me laugh out loud - see they do have a use, they brightened up my morning. Anyway, in amongst the bingo card of anti-cycling tropes, I note a new fashion critique to sit alongside the old favourite "lycra": "urban warriors in helmets". I must admit to being totally confused now. Don't the "war on motorists" lot usually advocate for mandatory use of plastic hats? But now wearing a helmet is the mark of an angry anti-drivist?
I also loved this bit: "The vast majority of people intending to travel outside of highly urbanised areas rely on their cars."
Yes, that's kind of the point isn't it. Cars are woefully inefficient in urban areas so other solutions are needed so that the emergency services & disabled drivers that correspondents like this are usually so concerned about, can get about. You don't tend to get traffic lights for cyclists (AI or otherwise) on motorways, dual carriageways, winding country lanes etc do you?
Exactly. I don't know precisely where they've been installed, but apparently it's at a (singular) toucan crossing on the A34 Stratford Road near Blythe Valley, which looks something like this: https://maps.app.goo.gl/Mo7k5vwWhQ7rKoPq6 . Doesn't look much like a war on motorists to me. Affording the occasional cyclist a nicely timed crossing doesn't seem much of an impingement on the motoring facilities on display.
So the Council's trialling a camera based system, rather than a beg button or loop in the path?
A war on motorists might be motorists needing to use a beg button at each junction, that waits for a gap in pedestrians/cyclists before turning green?
The only one I can think it will be is the one on the path out of Blythe valley towards Tesco. It's on a section of 40mph road straight off a 50mph motorway exit roundabout and on a slight curve. All the sensor will be doing is picking up someone on a bike before they have to stop at the crossing and press the button.
The benefits are that the cyclists may maintain momentum so wins and as they clear the crossing more quickly, the time at red on the carriageway could be less. Win, Win!
But hey, let's not spoil the story with the facts!
I was thinking the same as I read it. Just back from a 45mile country ride and I think I went through 2 sets of lights. The first a narrow railway arch on the London to Birmingham line so probably pre 1850 and pre car. The second a crossing in my home town presumably put in because drivers can't be expected to not run over people crossing a road. However, I'm not expecting any AI help although an ASL would be nice.
Also: referring to cycling as a "hobby" rather than just a normal means of getting from A to B.
Motornormativity at its best. We all know the only way you get from A to B is in a car. All other journeys are far less valuable.
A small minority of angry Telegraph journalists fomenting discontent.
there, i fixed it for you.
Exactly this. A small minority. Why everyone feeds these minorities on both sides that fuel all the anger, I'll never know. I'd say I have incidents with less than 5% of the cars I interact with. The other 95% are just fine. Its not about bikers or drivers, its about c**ts. C**ts are everywhere; on bikes, in cars, driving busses, walking in the street. Don't be a c**t.
Ah - another "if only there weren't c**ts, we'd have no problems". With transport in the UK I don't think that's true in most senses *. And how do you propose reducing the numbers of c**ts in the world?
Given that driving is the norm (dominant transport mode most places in the UK) and only around 1-2% of journeys are cycled across the UK on average, that's tens of c**ts equipped with insulating, extremely powerful exoskeletons which take up tons of space and cause a lot of pollution, for each c**t with much lower- threat, extremely space-efficient, barely polluting quiet cycle...
Plus the authorities which aren't actually *against* the cycles (because of those problematic c**ts) certainly aren't in favour of adversely affecting motorists' comfort, just because a few are driven by c**ts.
* There are lots of problems intrinsic to mass motoring, even with perfect drivers. But we have humans and even "careful, competent" humans occasionally make terrible errors. Magnify that with a large fraction of the population, no "continuing training" or health checks, 20mph+ speeds and a ton of so of metal...
'And how do you propose reducing the numbers of c**ts in the world?'
I think I've seen Mitsky comment a number of times on ways not to reduce but stop them reproducing.
I assume AI also featured fairly heavily in Chris Aslet von piffle Biscuit-barrel's journalism. "Alexa, do me 500 words on cyclists and traffic lights, torygraph-style, whilst I polish off this port what-what"..
Extremely unlikely: AI would have made a lot more sense.
Pages