He may have been one of the stars of the first two series of Netflix’s fly-on-the-wall Tour de France documentary – after all, who doesn’t love a tense and moody post-stage, mid-massage debrief scene? – but Tom Pidcock won’t be heading to cycling’s biggest race in 2025, the British star confirmed in an interview with BBC Sport at the weekend.
Following his long, drawn-out transfer from the Ineos Grenadiers to second-tier Q36.5 Pro Cycling over the winter, Pidcock and his team are now reliant on wildcard invitations to WorldTour races, including the grand tours and most important classics.
And with the Tour’s final two invites set to be handed out to either breakaway-hungry Uno-X, Julian Alaphilippe’s Tudor squad, or French outfit TotalEnergies, Q36.5’s chances of making it to the start line in Lille on 5 July are somewhat slim, double Olympic champion on the books are otherwise.
Not that Pidcock, who’s had a love-hate relationship with the Tour and the pressures of riding for GC over the past few years, seems to mind that much.
(Georg Lindacher)
“We’ll have a year out from the Tour and try to get to the Tour in 2026,” the 25-year-old, who won a stage of the 2022 race atop Alpe d’Huez, told the BBC.
“I’m happy I’ve got a year out from it, a break. When I come back, it’ll be with a refreshed energy.”
While the former Amstel Gold and Strade Bianche winner is happy to sit out the Tour – where he appeared to be visibly bristling against the GC-focused demands placed upon him by Ineos at the race last year – for one year at least, he remains confident Q36.5 will secure invites to the events he’s most focused on: the one-day classics.
In fact, Pidcock is almost certain to race this year’s traditional Belgian Opening Weekend of Omloop Het Nieuwsblad and Kuurne-Brussel-Kuurne, with the aim of taking in a full spring campaign with the Swiss squad.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“We don’t have full control over the calendar, we have to get invited,” he added. “But in theory we should have all the races that I want to do.”
Meanwhile, at Q36.5’s media day in Calpe yesterday, Pidcock told reporters, including Daniel Benson, that his decision to break his contract with Ineos early, amid an apparent breakdown in his relationship with the British team, was “business, not personal”.
“Things were just not going how it was originally envisioned at Ineos and how I had imagined it. The solution, the mutual solution, was to end the contract, which was the best,” Pidcock said during a press conference.
The 25-year-old was sensationally dropped at the last minute from the Ineos squad for Il Lombardia in October following months of tension within the struggling squad, kicking off a protracted transfer saga that ultimately led to Pidcock leaving the team he turned pro with in 2021, and signing a three-year deal with Q36.5 in December.
But, the Yorkshire all-rounder says, there was no specific moment that hastened his departure from Ineos.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“Things were just not going how it was originally envisioned at Ineos and how I had imagined it. The solution, the mutual solution, was to end the contract, which was the best,” he said when asked why he moved teams.
“It wasn’t a specific moment. It had been going on for a while. There’s no secret that last year was difficult for me, and Ineos I guess. It was more of a gradual thing.”
Pidcock then pointed to the changes that have taken place within Ineos since he signed four years ago, including the departure of team principal Dave Brailsford.
Meanwhile, it’s also clear that he will be afforded more freedom at Q36.5, where his off-road and classics ambitions won’t be stifled by an apparent desire for further success at grand tours, which seemed to be the main, and somewhat overbearing desire, at Ineos, a team formerly dominant at cycling’s three-week races.
(Zac Williams/SWpix.com)
“To be perfectly honest with you, I’m struggling to give an answer to that question because I’ve actually moved on,” Pidcock insisted when asked again why his spell at Ineos had ended in such acrimonious fashion.
“That team was my second family and I had great memories there but it was time to change. I accepted that a long time ago and I’m fully focused here and that’s not a scripted answer, I’m just very good at putting things behind me and moving on.
“Ineos was a fantastic team. They have their motivations and goals, and how they want to achieve them but at the end of the day what happened with me was business, it wasn’t personal.
“I signed my contract with different people who run the team now and that did create some difficulties, just from what I imagined it would be like to what happened but they still gave me every support in things they wanted to achieve.
“I had a lot of people were questioning why I had come to this team and saying these are my prime years, and that I should be winning as much as possible. But it’s not all about winning. It’s about the story you write, who you write it with, and what you achieve.
“It’s not only about winning, it’s about what you build, and here I can gain more satisfaction than anywhere else.”
Add new comment
8 comments
It was an opportunity missed, even the coverage from France that was pencilled in by Eurosport/Discovery+ was mysteriously removed.
What was the point in that Shell sponsorship again? At the time they said "We’re looking forward to working alongside Shell UK over the rest of this decade to widen access to the sport".
One wonders what British Cycling are spending their money on. Track racing most likely......
If the National champs can't be filmed/streamed live, then what hope has the sport? It shouldn't be down to the local organiser to put this together. The national governing body should ensure all national champs are availible to watch. From memory, it wasn't long ago even the Road Nationals ( in the Isle of Man) weren't covered live.
As a MTB racing fan, I've got used to no live coverage of Nationals......
Saying that, the country (Netherlands) who've dominated recent World champs, didn't have live coverage either - as their national broadcaster prefers to cover Speed skating....
I think that tells you how big (or not) the sport of CX actually is......
This , unfortunately, is exactly the issue. BC cares about one thing above all, securing medals in Olympic events. And most of our success has always been track cycling. The good ol' lets play it safe and not venture into other areas. It's a shame when you see the talent we have. You can rest assured they will want to take credit for MTB success on the back of Tom Pidcock but won't do a damn thing to broaden their horizons into backing his other discipline. Why? There are no medals in the Olympics for cyclocross. It's that simple.
Got to agree with that and it's difficult to criticise them about that when the measure of the sports success (in terms of securing future funding) is how many medals did they bring home, particularly when track cycling has both a lot of medals up for grabs AND the same athletes can compete in several disciplines. Whilst we would all love to see the money spread wider, when the measure is ‘Pounds per Medal’ and track cycling provides a good return.
Remember how money was poured into swimming, tons of it and then when the success didn’t come how the funding was taken away. Possibly I missed it because I’m not interesting in swimming, but when was the last time you saw swimming on the BBC? We are at least getting some TV coverage.
When was the last time we saw cycling on the BBC ? Olympics, Worlds & Ride London last year, that was pretty much it wasn't it ?
No ones demanding national broadcaster coverage, as nice as that would be, but online coverage via YouTube should be the minimum expected for nationals.
And it's a really simple equation, the more interest & more people watching it you get, the more sponsors get interested and the more potential Olympic medal winning talent you will unearth.
If they're anything like other federations, then they're spending it on trying to win Olympic medals, because that's where the lottery funding comes from. No medals, no money. I'm fairly sure I remember an interview with some badminton (?) players who had just won a bronze which was more or less the difference between solvency and insolvency for their federation.
Which makes you wonder why they don't do more around MTB because that's been a happy hunting ground (as long as MVDP crashes in warm-up or DNS).
Maybe things will change in the lead-up to the winter 2030 Olympics. How do Zoe Bäckstedt, Cat Ferguson and Imogen Wolff perform on snow?