February may have only just started, the winter bikes are still out in force, and the cyclocross obsession hasn’t worn off just yet – but we already have our first ‘extreme weather protocol’ scandal of the 2025 road season.
I swear they’re getting earlier every year…
After potholes at the AlUla Tour last week prompted a pre-finish detour, this season’s inaugural showdown between riders and race organisers over safety took place on Saturday, during the penultimate leg of the five-day ‘not a stage race’ Mallorca Challenge.
> “Tech always gets faster – it’s on riders to not do stupid things,” says Tadej Pogačar, after rival team boss called for “slower bikes to save lives” and pro claimed “modern bikes break every time you crash”
Just half an hour and 23km into the hilly Trofeo Andratx-Pollença, which was set to climb the Coll de Puig Major, a mainstay of cycling holidays on the Spanish island, the peloton pulled the pin and decided to neutralise the race due to the wet and treacherous conditions.
According to reports, 50 riders crashed in ten separate spills, with some – including Jordi López of Euskaltel-Euskadi, who injured his shoulder – being taken to hospital, while a number of team car drivers said they were also slipping off the slick Mallorcan roads.
Representatives of the riders’ union, the CPA, then informed the race officials that they would not continue, before heading back to their hotels – a decision that was heavily criticised by the organisers, who questioned why the riders chose to pack up before they could arrange a potentially safer alternative route.
“We respect their decision, but we do not agree with it, and we do not like it at all,” race director Manolo Hernández said on Saturday.
“If this were the Tour de France or Vuelta a España, they would not have stopped. Organising these events takes a lot of effort.
“I’m not saying a stage should never be suspended because the safety of the riders comes first, but many factors need to be considered before making such a decision. If race organisers cannot have a say, perhaps we should stop organising cycling races altogether and find another job.”
However, on Sunday morning – ahead of the final race of the traditional season-opening event in Palma – tensions between the organisers and teams continued to run high, as Movistar DS José Joaquín Rojas claimed that no one from the race organisation was present when the riders stopped racing to discuss any possible alternatives, a claim denied by the Mallorca Challenge team.
And before yesterday’s race, won with a stunning late attack by Portugal’s Olympic champion Iúri Leitão, the organisers got their own back by pulling their announcer from the morning sign-in festivities, leaving the riders alone to wave to the fans without the traditional pomp and circumstance. Very mature stuff.
> “Close your eyes and hope for the best”: Riders’ union president slams cobbled race organisers after pros complain “thick layers of mud” caused crashes
Meanwhile, the CPA’s president Adam Hansen, in his usual style, addressed the issue in a lengthy social media post, defending the rider and arguing that the decision to stop the race was the “right decision to protect their physical integrity and their lives”.
“The start of today’s race was chaotic,” Hansen said on Saturday night. “The road was completely slippery due to the rain, leading to numerous crashes. All medical services were occupied assisting multiple riders, with some even being evacuated to the hospital.
“As of 2025, with the changes to the implementation of the ‘Protocol for Discussions Regarding Extreme Weather Conditions and Rider Safety During Events’, specific actions are outlined for cases where no decision has been made before the start of the race, but safety conditions require action during the race.
“Under UCI regulations, the CPA appoints three riders to represent all riders in such situations. Today, after the start of the race, heavy rain created hazardous road conditions, resulting in more than ten crashes across multiple areas, involving over 50 riders.
“Given that the slippery roads continued to pose a significant risk, the riders realised that the situation would persist unless an alternative solution was implemented. The three designated riders, representing the entire peloton, approached the President of the Commissaires’ Panel to inform them that the race could not safely continue.
“They emphasised that if the race proceeded, crashes would continue, while medical services were already fully engaged with injured riders and hospital transfers.”
> "Profound safety problem" in elite cycling, finds report... but riders union president says it's "getting safer"
He continued: “According to the 2025 updates to the Extreme Weather Protocol (EWP), the President of the Commissaires’ Panel should have neutralised the race (in this case, stopped it to prevent further crashes) and consulted all stakeholders.
“Unfortunately, this did not happen. The riders received no feedback, nor was any alternative plan communicated by the organisers, the commissaires, or the riders’ team directors. At this point, the riders made the decision to protect their physical integrity.
“We also believe that a solution could have been found. Organisers always have a Plan B in case of bad weather affecting the race route. For example, the race could have been neutralised until a safer point and restarted from there.
“The riders made the right decision to protect their physical integrity and their lives. While we acknowledge that a decision could have been made earlier, the next step was not taken by the President of the Commissaires’ Panel (PCP). This should not have been a unilateral decision.
“There should have been discussions between all stakeholders, but unfortunately this did not happen. Riders are the last ones who would want to see a race stopped, as their job is to compete.”
Add new comment
7 comments
Land ownership in England is a complete farce. Riverside walks are out of bounds and for cycling, the craziest situation is the Lambley viaduct railway path .
Families arrive there in their bikes and then have the choice of risking their lives on the steep steps or doing a 100% about turn.
Eventually someone will die, it certainiy a tragedy in waiting. The advent of ebikes makes certain of that. (Fyi. I have sent this to the council. My previous contact, I think never got any reply)
I can't have been the only one momentarily confused as to why you thought Jacob Rees-Mogg was still an MP.
Snake Pass could possibly be closed to motor vehicles due to the costs of having to keep repairing it due to landslides.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c5yrnz5wxgko
Sounds promising. But if it closes to motor vehicles because of the landslips, might it close to all vehicles on safety grounds?
Which could be great news, but if the council are asking for money to repair it now, what happens if they hand it over to a walking/cycling route and the land slips continue like they have on the Old Mam Tor road. Great for mountain biking but not an alternative route to Winnats or Mam Nick on a less rugged bike.
While the weight of the vehicles will play a part on the ground giving way, the geology will also play a part. I am sure that the freeze and thaw that happens up there regularly will play havoc with the ground underneath.
Oldfield Lane, Altrincham, which links Oldfield Brow to Dunham Park was permanently closed to motor traffic during the pandemic.
Subsquently vegetation has encroached from both sides and mud/debris has washed off the surrounding fields.
My point is that although closing roads to motor vehicles may appear attractive the road becomes unusable unless it is regularly maintained.
There's the rub though - as Laura Laker noted recently in a Cycling UK article, we understand (mostly...) we need to maintain roads and there are processes and a budget for that. Cycle infra? Very often "nope". That's probably because lots of it was established or even built by charities!
(This effect isn't limited to cycle infra of course. Local authorities - or even national ones - can be quite happy to take credit for / proudly list stuff that was provided by charities. Because it's not "in house" though there is no "ownership" by the bigger authority so there will likely not be a budget to keep it going and it definitely won't be seen as their responsibility to fix if it breaks).