Feels like it’s been a while since we’ve had Jeremy Vine on our live blog, but he’s back with a video showing not just one, not just two, but a total of sixty-eight — yes 68 vehicles parked on a cycle lane, basically blocking it the whole way.
The cycle lane in question is the Kensington cycle lane, or “cycle lane”, in inverted commas as the BBC and Channel 5 presenter puts it in his short clip shared on Twitter. And despite the blasphemous stuff we’ve seen at road.cc regarding bike lanes, including the “BMX track” masquerading as one yesterday, this one is definitely up there in terms of being one of the worst offenders.
“Now don’t laugh”, says Vine in the video. “This is the start of the Kensington ‘cycle lane’… Look how many cars are parked in it, because apparently cyclists don’t need protecting on bank holidays.”
“But the thing is, people are cycling on bank holidays. And drivers are behaving the same!” he continues, as a couple more cyclists on Lime bikes pass him by. But that’s not where the drama ends, as we see the few-seconds old phrase “drivers behaving the same” repeated once again, with a motorist — face buried in their cell phone — holding up a fire engine. But yeah, it’s because of all the cycle lanes that emergency services are delayed, got it.
> “Car brain strikes again”: Motorist parked blocking shared cycle and pedestrian path tells cyclist to “get on the road”
Vine says: “So I head to the front of this line of cars and vans, we see a fire engine… and the fire engine is being held up by this guy, the fire engine hoots, and what do we think this guy is doing? Of course he’s on his phone.
“I counted 68 cars parked in the cycle lane! Compare it with this, a segregated lane, King Street, Hammersmith,” he says while cutting to a different video, showing him riding in the bike lane separated by wands while a Waitrose HGV passes him on the road. “That’s a massive truck, but I’m safe. Those beautiful wands keep us apart.
“This is why you have cycle lanes, in a nutshell, that’s it. Not just painted lines, Kensington… Kensington will never change, we know that. You just have to be very careful in that borough because on two wheels in Kensington, you’re in mortal danger.”
> Why don't cyclists use the cycle lane? Because a farmer has dumped hundreds of tonnes of sugar beet in it
One person wrote sarcastically: “This is why cyclists should be forced to use cycle lanes when they're there. Unless of course we're parked in them. Then they don't have to use them,” while CyclingMikey commented: “Playing at being the Royal Borough of Killing Children due to their ridiculously pro-car and anti-people policies.”
Meanwhile, David Kirkwood said: “The brutal reality is that key decision makers are carcentric. If we remember public highway is land the public had a right to use in reasonable safety - then ask why it’s been delivered up for use by motor vehicles that is so obviously obstructive & dangerous to the public?”
Well, the next time someone asks you why don’t cyclists use the bike lane, maybe just point them to this video, or this live blog. Or maybe, this one from February, where drivers got mad at cyclists and claimed that they’re “playing with traffic”, because cyclists didn’t feel like using this “perfectly good footpath that has a bike symbol on it and a bollard in the middle of it”.
Or maybe this one, where pretty similar to the Kensington bike lane, motorists turned Bristol’s *checks notes* Park Row into a… car park. Ah, the irony is too on the nose sometimes, isn’t it?
Perhaps even more ironically, road.cc’s favourite politician, Nick Fletcher who’s built up quite a CV for himself spouting non-sense about everything, from 15-minute cities being a an “international socialist conspiracy” to the “rarely used” cycling infrastructure in Doncaster taking away from drivers and pedestrians, said in January this year that cyclists that are “unloved” by cyclists were finally being used in the town centre — but not by cyclists, but by motorists to park their cars… I told you, the irony writes itself!
Add new comment
17 comments
Jeremy Vine shows cycle lane with SIXTY-EIGHT vehicles parked on it
Damn! Just one out.
On the boundary of Edinburgh City, on the A92, is Cramond Brig, an ancient bridge (hence the name) over the River Almond. The bridge is closed to motor traffic. It also has a popular pub beside it, bearing the same name. A few years ago, in order to segregate pedestrians from cyclists and cars on the road leading to the bridge and the secondary car park immediately before it, a pedestrian lane was created at the side of the road, with a solid white line and pedestrian symbols painted on it.
Barely any time I cycle that way (which is very often) are there no cars parked in it, even when the pub's main car park is far from full. At weekends in particular, the lane can be entirely filled with vehicles.
I make a point of not only telling motorists that they are endangering peds but informing otherwise oblivious peds that the cars are parked in a lane which was supposed to make them safer, hoping that might actually instill some pro-cyclist/anti selfish driver feelings in them. Some of the peds are noticeably surprised and shocked so at least some positive outcome for what it's worth.
Give a motorist somewhere to dump their vehicle and that's what they'll do, regardless.
Passed a Range Rover (shocker!) on the way back from the shops this evening, driver double parked but with a space much bigger than his vehicle right beside him. So he was double parked (on the apex of a bend) beside an invisible car! He'd stopped to text on his handheld phone. Pretty sure the engine was running too (had my headphones on), making that illegal as well as selfish and irresponsible.
Cramond Brig used to be local to me - I remember the "but speeding cyclists" and then addition of gate-style barriers and then the lane you mention etc. (haven't been that way for a few years so don't know how it is now).
To be fair it is a place where lots of pedestrians wander / linger - especially on the Brig. And the sharp hill down from the (now Steakhouse) and turns (and lack of footway combined with people parking their cars, despite drives) on Braepark Road mean that complaints and conflicts are likely. And from people inclined to write strongly-worded letters to the press / have a word down the club with the powers that be...
This is both a very popular "recreational" access route AND a surprisingly popular commuter route (presumably folks cycling from Queensferry or beyond).
There isn't a "perfect" solution exactly (without e.g. more bridge) but it doesn't take a Dutch traffic engineer to spot at least one way things could be improved here - giving a flatter route also.
(The ideal way would be to acknowledge that Queensferry Road is now an "urban motorway" and address that e.g. proper separate cycle provision as the Dutch would, there is space at least part of the way in the (privately-owned?) woods or possibly a route could pieced together via Barnton park etc. although that would also be "wiggly").
No difference I'd reckon, other than the road joining the Brig to the A90 and cycle path becominv more broken up year on year.
The peds are rarely an issue, some wandering across your path (but that's pretty much expected), some who pause to let you ride through the zig zag barriers, others deciding not to concede priority. It's only the selfish parking I have an issue with.
The question is who painted the pedal lane, or rather who ordered it to be painted. I'm assuming the short stretch of road is publicly-owned and that the ped lane is therefore mandatory, making parking in it illegal. But despite the easy pickings for enforcement, I very much doubt either council or police would consider it worth the manpower to go and ticket the offenders. Instead, they just hope drivers will respect the law.
Did I just type that last sentence? 🤣
Singletrack were discussing the MTB worlds and some kind poster linked this, the downhill will be shown delayed, the xc will be live, I believe.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b095szlg/broadcasts/upcoming
Is that a Porsche 993 in the top pic? Beautiful car, though not the colour I'd have chosen.
Good spot... Arena red I think.
Those cars in the Kensington cycle lane are doing Vine a favour. Unsegregated white lines are, for good reason, known as 'The Murder Strip.' Never cycle in The Murder Strip.
It does look quite wide. I thought murder strips were narrow, with the line implying you can fit a bike and car safely side by side when you can't.
There are a few of those near us. Even without the car you couldn't fit a bike in safely, thanks go the potholes, drain covers, uneven tarmac, etc.
RE: London bus drivers have had no specific training about sharing the road with cyclists...
Heavy irony there *.
Ignoring "who's right" look at the road / street. Entirely lined with cars on both sides. Including ones apparently parked right up to a junction (appears to be a mini-roundabout) - see HC rule 243 although unfortunately that's an "advisory" AKA "so what?". That rather ensures the potential for "conflict".
* The "specific training" being of course that every motorist apparent needs: "all the standard rules you apply in all situations, the ones we haven't qualified because that's just normal driving? They ALSO apply when you encounter a cyclist - yes, really!
Interesting comments from Carapaz about respect. I'd argue that Carapaz, and the peloton in general's lack of respect for Decathlon taking the role of GC Leaders team, played a significant role in Decathlon struggling to shut the race down.
If it was Visma or UAE calling it the way Decathlon did, people wouldn't continue to try and get away. Carapaz's attempt to attack looked more like a refusal to let Decathlon control the pace than any serious attack.
So, I'm keeping my pitch forks in the shed for now.
Cycle lanes are just extra parking lets be honest. There is zero enforcement so why wouldn't people use them? Same as the people that park on pavements and completely block it for anyone who is in a wheelchair or pushing children. They don't give a shit about anyone but themselves and they don't suffer any consequences for their selfishness. Perhaps, when councils are crying out for money, they should enforce their parking rules and bring in a load of money from the assholes of society.
Detoured from my usual route home yesterday, on what is the designated safe cycling route rather than the more direct road route.
One part is safe, an offroad bike/pedestrian path, but the rest is on road with lines (OK), on pavement, then on road, then on pavement, then on road with wands (sh*te and dangerous) and an on pavement stretch with (always occupied) parking bays.
Full marks Kingston-upon-Thames for completely wasting the mini-holland money.
That would be the war on motorists enforced by the minority cycling cult.
Exactly this. The cycle lane heading into Kingston from Esher is without fail full of vehicles every weekend. And others near me are regularly used as personal parking spaces. As for the pavements, they're full of parked cars all around Surrey. Not a finger gets lifted to stop it.
Top tip, host a stage of the Tour of Britain, cars that spend all their time parked in cycle lanes magically disappear when there's a real threat of being towed away.
This road through Trimley to Felixstowe is constantly used as a cycle lane car park, yet next Sunday it will look lovely bit of infra & all traffic free.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/1B1jRCZMbntP5K6s5?g_st=ac