Cycling UK has praised the Welsh government’s decision to halt or amend almost all major road building projects – which forms part of a new transport plan that aims to reduce carbon emissions, improve road safety, and prioritise cycling, walking, and public transport use – as “the most significant change in UK roads building policy over the last 20 years”.
The charity’s head of campaigns, Duncan Dollimore, says the move to delay, change, or even scrap over 50 schemes across Wales, as well as “raising the bar for where new roads are the right response to transport problems”, represents a “marked shift from other UK administrations’ simplistic and outdated views of building more roads as the answer to all transport woes from congestion to poor air quality”.
59 road-building projects have been on hold in Wales since June 2021, when the then-newly re-elected Labour government announced the creation of an independent expert review panel, which reassessed the schemes against a series of tests concerning their environmental impact.
The findings of the year-long review, headed by transport expert Dr Lynn Sloman and published yesterday alongside the Welsh government’s decision, recommended that only 15 of the 59 assessed projects will go ahead as planned, with others set to be revised, postponed, or shelved entirely.
The controversial ‘red route’ scheme in Flintshire, a planned major new road which threatened ancient woodland, is one of the projects that will not go ahead, with improvements instead set to be made to the A494 at Aston Hill. Meanwhile, plans for a third Menai crossing between Anglesey and the mainland have been halted in favour of a review exploring congestion, the resilience of current bridges, and alternative modes of transport.
Most notably, as recommended by the independent review, the Welsh government has introduced a strict criteria for all future road-building projects.
According to this criteria, investment will only be considered for road schemes if they:
- Reduce carbon emissions and support a shift to public transport, walking, and cycling
- improve safety through small-scale change
- help the Welsh Government adapt to the impacts of climate change
- provide connections to jobs and areas of economic activity in a way that maximises the use of public transport, walking, and cycling
“We will still invest in roads,” Wales’ deputy climate change minister Lee Waters told the Senedd yesterday.
“In fact, we are building new roads as I speak – but we are raising the bar for where new roads are the right response to transport problems. We are also investing in real alternatives, including investment in rail, bus, walking, and cycling projects.
“Our approach for the last 70 years is not working. As the review points out, the by-pass that was demanded to relieve congestion often ends up leading to extra traffic, which in time brings further demands for extra lanes, wider junctions, and more roads.
“Round and round we go, emitting more and more carbon as we do it, and we will not get to Net Zero unless we stop doing the same thing over and over.”
Responding to the Welsh government’s National Transport Plan, Cycling UK’s Duncan Dollimore praised the proposals as “bold in principle and forward looking as they realise the economic benefit of placing people and the environment at the heart of transport policy.
“This is a marked shift from other UK administrations’ simplistic and outdated views of building more roads as the answer to all transport woes from congestion to poor air quality.”
> Wales set to reduce default speed limit to 20mph in residential areas
However, the National Transport Plan has been criticised by one of Labour’s former transport ministers, Ken Skates, who accused his party and the independent review of “ignoring citizens”.
Pointing to the decision to scrap planned improvements to the A483 around Wrexham, Skates told BBC Wales that the project was “planned to remove the traffic from those local roads that were polluting the air, [and] that are damaging the environment because of sky-high carbon emissions.
“I’m concerned that the panel didn’t actually engage with any communities, as far as I’m aware. It didn’t engage with locally elected members. The engagement with council highways officers was very poor.
“What we had is a diktat which says basically a decision has been made 140 miles away, that vitally important infrastructure works will not go ahead, and by the way there are no alternatives that we can tell you about today.”
Waters, meanwhile, accepted that the new “ground-breaking” policy would attract some criticism, but insisted that “it’s always difficult to make decisions with short-term pain for long-term gain”.
“None of this is easy but neither is the alternative,” he said.
Add new comment
22 comments
I think it's very easy to be quite smug about this if you're already living in an area with great road networks like we have here in MK.
I'm originally from Swansea and have been travelling back there my whole life (a long time!). The M4 between Newport and Cardiff is absolutely terrible, most of the time. Heads of the Valley, also terrible. Going south to north, terrible. Generally terrible. Drippy is not endearing himself to his voters on this and many other topics currently. What has traditionally been a Labour stronghold is very much under threat I feel.
When you say "terrible" I think it's important to be specific. Terrible like this?
http://wcc.crankfoot.xyz/facility-of-the-month/
Or like this?
https://www.cycling-embassy.org.uk/insert-loved-one-here
Or like this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z7o3sRxA5g
I mean - answers to a "problem" depends on the question you're asking. I suspect "terrible" doesn't mean "it is impossible to drive there" - because this isn't really true in the UK? Does it means "we can't drive as quickly / conveniently as we want between any two given points"? The answer to that is likely to involve "more driving".
As Awavey points out some things will continue because politics. As rich_cb writes there are probably some compromises and nuance. Yes, change is definitely easier (less change) in some places (e.g. urban areas, well-funded places with plenty of jobs / amenities). In general I think the principle here is valid e.g. "If driving is part of the problem then making driving easier (which will lead to more driving) is not going to help solve the problem".
Getting away from simply building more roads in already busy locations is one thing but, Wales really does need some improvements in road links. Going east-west in the far north or south is fine but the north south links and mid wales links are missing.
Getting from Aberystwyth to Swansea, or anywhere to central Wales for example is really really slow. There are also a lot of tiny village high streets that currently take crazy amounts of traffic.
I agree, paradoxically those towns and villages will struggle to encourage active travel because of the sheer volume of through traffic.
I support the Welsh Government's position in principle but I think bypass schemes should be exempted where it can be shown that the traffic volumes are significantly impacting residents.
Sounds encouraging.
Maybe the Jevons paradox has been understood. It will be interesting to see how the implimentation goes.
This article should have an 'environment' tag.
the National Transport Plan has been criticised by one of Labour’s former transport ministers, Ken Skates, who accused his party and the independent review of “ignoring citizens” . . . . . apart from the citizens who walk, cycle or take the bus, obviously.
Looking forward to the Daily Fail melt down on this one
Whilst the overall sentiment is definitely positive the devil is, as always, in the detail.
A lot of road building schemes have simply been reclassified. In Cardiff, for instance, the proposed completion of the A4232 ring road has been designated a 'local authority project' meaning it can still go ahead despite the apparent ban.
Despite that, kudos to the Welsh Government for sticking their heads above the parapet on this issue.
but would I be right to be cynical that the cancelled schemes are more likely simply due to a lack of available funds,rather than the more zeitgeist friendly carbon zero idea instead ?
I think it's always a good idea to be cynical whenever politicians announce anything.
Net zero is certainly a good figleaf for 'sorry we wasted all our money on airports and overpriced farms'.
Edit: Update. Cynicism appears warranted. They're also massively cutting funding for buses which appears slightly at odds with a net zero ethos.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-64650058
Edit 2:
The Welsh Government seem to be backtracking.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-politics-64896796
“Our approach for the last 70 years is not working."
At last, a politician who not only acknowledges the futility of trying to build your way out of congestion, but is prepared to take action. Congratulations to the Welsh Labour party and may the other parties finally wake up to what the Greens have been telling them for decades.
I still can't believe that the Welsh Government have taken that bold step, but I'm very happy to see that they have.
It sets a great example to other authorities who continue to contribute towards climate change in the face of their declared 'climate emergencies'.
Fair play to 'em.
So they have (finally) accepted something that has been talked about for years. It will be interesting to see whether they have the nerve to stick with this plan, or whether they get utterly hammered at the next election because Welsh White Van Man (or Woman) will vote according to the needs of their wheels.
I'm sure that despite some Labour objectors the proposals will have the full support of the Welsh Conservative party as in many ways Lee Waters speech is following their own policies and in fact echoing the foreword to Gear Change One Year On written by their former leader.
Yep...
I'm not going to go the Gower (beautiful place for a holiday, by the way) this summer because Wales *checks notes* doesn't have enough roads.
It's madness - they'll be closing down the Snowdonia Mountain motorway next! It's already getting congested - they need a relief road or tourism will die.
There's a lovely bus service from Swansea all the way to Rhosilli Bay, I used it several times as a student 🙂
That's nice to know, thank you for sharing. I always used to avoid bus (and to a certain extent, train) travel because I got terribly travel sick. I've now discovered Kwells and take them for anything longer than 30 mins. Life changing. I will give that a go next time I'm that way, thanks.
Went to Snowdonia last year it was really slow around Oswestry so my own conclusion was that England needs more roads but Wales is fine.