The successful bidder at an auction last week of a Raleigh bicycle once owned by the late Diana, Princess of Wales that was dubbed her 'shame bike' by the tabloid press bought it so he can put it on display to highlight “the British Royal Family’s basic racist roots," he has told road.cc.
Barry Glazer, a prominent attorney in Baltimore, Maryland, bid £44,000 – more than twice the top end of the estimate – for the blue Raleigh bicycle when it was auctioned by Burstow & Hewett Auctioneers in Battle, East Sussex last week.
According to an invoice seen by road.cc raised to Mr Glazer by the auction house – which has not disclosed the identity of the winning bidder – the buyer’s premium plus surcharge and VAT takes the total amount to £57,200.
In a statement, his firm The Law Office of Barry R Glazer LLC told road.cc that he “will be setting up a memorial dedicated to the British Royal Family’s basic racist roots.
“The memorial will be set up in an enclave in his office located in a historic building, utilised by the underground ‘railroad’ to assist slaves to freedom in Baltimore.”
African slaves were first brought to St Mary’s City, the first English settlement in what is now Maryland, in 1642 to work on tobacco plantations.
In the following century, by which time the British throne was held by the House of Hanover, slavery continued to be supported by the Crown in what were then the Colonies until the Revolutionary War, which resulted in the independence of the United States.
The ‘underground railroad’ – a network of safe routes typically using Native American trails and inland waterways – was established in the early to mid-19th Century to enable enslaved African-Americans, often assisted by white abolitionists, to escape to free states as well as Canada.
One key route passed through Baltimore, which was also the city where the first blood was spilt in the American Civil War when troops from Massachusetts were fired on by civilians in the city on 19 April 1861.
Burstow & Hewett had expected Princess Diana’s former bike to fetch between £15,000 and £20,000 when it went under the hammer last Wednesday, saying it represented “a famous symbol of Diana’s oppression.”
As Lady Diana Spencer, she used the bike to commute from her home in Coleherne Court, west London, to the Pimlico nursery where she was working at the time her engagement to Prince Charles was announced.
But members of the royal household told her it was not a suitable form of transport for a future member of the Royal Family, and she reluctantly passed it on to a family friend, leading the press to dub it her “shame bike.”
The auctioneers cited increased interest in royal memorabilia following the success of the Netflix series The Crown, and also said that the treatment of the Duchess of Sussex – married to Princess Diana’s second son, Prince Harry – had also heightened interest in it.
Referring to the recent interview by Oprah Winfrey with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Mr Glazer’s firm said: “The memorial is particularly relevant now considering the present controversy with Harry and Meghan accusing their Royal Family of racism.”
According to the firm’s statement: “Mr Glazer is particularly disturbed by the fact that major US broadcasting stations televised the funeral of Prince Phillip for several hours, an honour usually reserved for US presidents.
“He explained that the Royal Family’s claim for superiority is rooted in the logic of white supremacy,” it continued.
“The logic is the same with racism – if wealth, honour, and respect can be earned by the mere accident of birth then surely the advantages of being white as a result of the same accident of birth can easily be justified,” the statement added.
A practising attorney since 1968, Mr Glazer’s TV advertisements, in which he holds himself out as a “Legal advocate for the injured, disabled, and urinated upon” have, according to this 2011 article, made him “something of a legend in the Baltimore area, and not without good reason.”
Help us to fund our site
We’ve noticed you’re using an ad blocker. If you like road.cc, but you don’t like ads, please consider subscribing to the site to support us directly. As a subscriber you can read road.cc ad-free, from as little as £1.99.
If you don’t want to subscribe, please turn your ad blocker off. The revenue from adverts helps to fund our site.
If you’ve enjoyed this article, then please consider subscribing to road.cc from as little as £1.99. Our mission is to bring you all the news that’s relevant to you as a cyclist, independent reviews, impartial buying advice and more. Your subscription will help us to do more.
Simon joined road.cc as news editor in 2009 and is now the site’s community editor, acting as a link between the team producing the content and our readers. A law and languages graduate, published translator and former retail analyst, he has reported on issues as diverse as cycling-related court cases, anti-doping investigations, the latest developments in the bike industry and the sport’s biggest races. Now back in London full-time after 15 years living in Oxford and Cambridge, he loves cycling along the Thames but misses having his former riding buddy, Elodie the miniature schnauzer, in the basket in front of him.
I think you pay VAT on the buyers premium, rather than the value of the item itself in an auction. WIth second hand goods sold by a VAT registered business VAT is typically charged on the profit.
I think you pay VAT on the buyers premium, rather than the value of the item itself in an auction. WIth second hand goods sold by a VAT registered business VAT is typically charged on the profit.
Quite correct. Registered traders recover VAT on their inputs and pay over VAT on their outputs or sales. VAT is an efficient, progressive tax.
I think you pay VAT on the buyers premium, rather than the value of the item itself in an auction. WIth second hand goods sold by a VAT registered business VAT is typically charged on the profit.
Quite correct. Registered traders recover VAT on their inputs and pay over VAT on their outputs or sales. VAT is an efficient, progressive tax.
Only if there is a VAT invoice for the input, which there won't be if it's a second hand bike traded in by Joe Public. Then I presume you use this: https://www.gov.uk/vat-margin-schemes
I trust that he'll also be buying a velocipede which once belonged to Robert E Lee's second cousin's cleaner for his exhibition, or some such other nonsense?
I'm sorry, but on this occasion a bike is just a bike.
All part of the American dream of relentless self-publicity. A ridiculous amount for an ordinary bicycle. Not about the opression of vulnerable road users, rather a tenuous attempt to address a US audience not connected to monarchy or cycling. He's free to waste his cash, hurrah....
Add new comment
16 comments
It was a bargain, a cheap way to get global advertising for his firm under the pretence of highlighting historic racism.
Err, wot?
I have read this article 4 times now and i still have absolutely no idea what its trying to tell me.
Good grief. You can even buy a Barry Glazer "Don't urinate on my leg and tell me its raining" T shirt or baseball cap. Form an orderly queue folks.
Didn't VAT already get paid on it when new?
It's got a bit more "value added" since new, hence bit more tax.
The thing is, you seem to pay vat on 2nd hand whatever the price (unless it's a private sale). I'm pro tax, but that's a scam.
I think you pay VAT on the buyers premium, rather than the value of the item itself in an auction. WIth second hand goods sold by a VAT registered business VAT is typically charged on the profit.
Quite correct. Registered traders recover VAT on their inputs and pay over VAT on their outputs or sales. VAT is an efficient, progressive tax.
Only if there is a VAT invoice for the input, which there won't be if it's a second hand bike traded in by Joe Public. Then I presume you use this:
https://www.gov.uk/vat-margin-schemes
I trust that he'll also be buying a velocipede which once belonged to Robert E Lee's second cousin's cleaner for his exhibition, or some such other nonsense?
I'm sorry, but on this occasion a bike is just a bike.
daddy I want to be the king when I grow up! Sorry son you were born to the wrong mother.
that sentence has no place in 2021, tear it down!
"Duchess of Suffolk"? I could've sworn it was Sussex.
Suffolkin'el... fixed!
The bike has been bought to highlight the Royal Families 'racist roots'. You couldn't make it up. It's just a bike for fucks sake.
All part of the American dream of relentless self-publicity. A ridiculous amount for an ordinary bicycle. Not about the opression of vulnerable road users, rather a tenuous attempt to address a US audience not connected to monarchy or cycling. He's free to waste his cash, hurrah....