- News
- Reviews
- Bikes
- Accessories
- Accessories - misc
- Computer mounts
- Bags
- Bar ends
- Bike bags & cases
- Bottle cages
- Bottles
- Cameras
- Car racks
- Child seats
- Computers
- Glasses
- GPS units
- Helmets
- Lights - front
- Lights - rear
- Lights - sets
- Locks
- Mirrors
- Mudguards
- Racks
- Pumps & CO2 inflators
- Puncture kits
- Reflectives
- Smart watches
- Stands and racks
- Trailers
- Clothing
- Components
- Bar tape & grips
- Bottom brackets
- Brake & gear cables
- Brake & STI levers
- Brake pads & spares
- Brakes
- Cassettes & freewheels
- Chains
- Chainsets & chainrings
- Derailleurs - front
- Derailleurs - rear
- Forks
- Gear levers & shifters
- Groupsets
- Handlebars & extensions
- Headsets
- Hubs
- Inner tubes
- Pedals
- Quick releases & skewers
- Saddles
- Seatposts
- Stems
- Wheels
- Tyres
- Health, fitness and nutrition
- Tools and workshop
- Miscellaneous
- Buyers Guides
- Features
- Forum
- Recommends
- Podcast
news
Daniel Fownes (Derbyshire Police)Drink driver who ploughed into cyclist with friend riding on bonnet jailed for 14 months
A drink driver who could be heard laughing as he sped through a Derbyshire town while his friend rode on his bonnet before hitting and injuring a cyclist has been jailed for 14 months.
35-year-old Daniel Fownes, a father of two, was already serving a suspended sentence for stealing more than £2,000 from a restaurant he was working at in Nottingham at the time of the offence at 3.55pm on 3 April last year in Ripley town centre, reports the Derby Telegraph.
Derby Crown Court heard that Fownes had been in pubs drinking beer and sambuca in the hours leading up to the incident, and CCTV footage was played showing the moment the Vauxhall Fownes was driving crashed into the victim's bike, sending him "20m down the road before coming to a stop" according to Recorder Simon Ash KC.
The Recorder added: "Witnesses heard laughter coming from the car because you thought it was funny. You could not see through the windscreen because your friend was on the bonnet.
"You hit (the victim) and he was knocked from his bike and he was then picked up and taken 20m down the road before coming to a stop. He was taken to hospital for treatment and there were large dents in the bonnet and the windscreen was smashed and this was a busy area where there were pedestrians."
The prosecutor Catherin Picardom told the court: "CCTV shows them [Fownes and his friend] first struggling towards the vehicle before the defendant got in the driver's seat and his friend climbed on the bonnet. Witnesses said at first it was doing around 10mph to 15mph but then sped up to a speed estimated to be around 40mph.
"It went down High Street and into Oxford Street, which is a one-way, where the impact was very, very, quick. He [the victim] fell to the floor and people came out of the shops very quickly to help him. The friend tried to help but unfortunately he was the worst for drink and put him in the recovery position.
"An ambulance was called and the cyclist was slurring. He was taken to the Royal Derby Hospital where fortunately his injuries were relatively minor.
"The defendant carried out a breath test at the scene and blew 74 (micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath when the legal limit is 35) and a further reading on the intoxiliser of 70. In interview he said they had been going from pub to pub and that he'd had four pints of lager and a sambuca shot."
In mitigation, Denney Lau said: "It is quite clear that on the day the owner of the car was the friend, my client was driving, he was joking and he accepts he did something very stupid."
Fownes pleaded guilty to dangerous driving, drink driving and driving without insurance before being handed his 14-month prison sentence.
Jack has been writing about cycling and multisport for over a decade, arriving at road.cc via 220 Triathlon Magazine in 2017. He worked across all areas of the website including tech, news and video, and also contributed to eBikeTips before being named Editor of road.cc in 2021 (much to his surprise). Jack has been hooked on cycling since his student days, and currently has a Trek 1.2 for winter riding, a beloved Bickerton folding bike for getting around town and an extra beloved custom Ridley Helium SLX for fantasising about going fast in his stable. Jack has never won a bike race, but does have a master's degree in print journalism and two Guinness World Records for pogo sticking (it's a long story).
Latest Comments
- giff77 44 sec ago
I would have expected the organisers when doing their recon to have flagged issues to the road authorities and to have hazards that were concerning...
- OldRidgeback 10 min 53 sec ago
If he'd been able to get hold of one of the rarer five speeds, it would've had a better choice of ratios. You can see it's got proper brakes, a big...
- David9694 21 min ago
But whAT aboUT thE disable d? (Foreground left - pretty faded)
- belugabob 29 min 11 sec ago
If that's their bag...
- Rendel Harris 1 hour 28 min ago
On the other hand presumably those hoops are pretty sturdy so they could prove just the ticket for securing one's machine with a U-lock or chain...
- Rendel Harris 4 hours 40 min ago
Wasn't her quote something like "Any man who takes the bus after the age of twenty-five [maybe thirty?] is a failure?...
- andystow 7 hours 31 min ago
Based on my experience with the Hunt wheels, I might do a review on their durability in three or four years.
- Destroyer666 11 hours 58 min ago
"...the beeswax-based covering magically shuns off whatever might be lurking in the corners. Even after multiple rides, when the bars rattled about...
- David9694 13 hours 20 min ago
t-boned
Add new comment
17 comments
Perhaps hIs suspended sentence was because he would never have stolen from his employer had he not been a thief, and he wouldn't have been a thief at all if he hadn't stolen. So as a victim of circumstance, if it worked once, maybe try it again....
Not cycling related, but this is a weird one - especially as being drunk was used as a mitigation for a drink driving charge!
"Nicholas White, mitigating, said that Farrell was of previously good character and that if he had not been drunk he would not have driven the bus."
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11474591/Reveller-drove-safe-bu...
Incredible defence. What next? I was speeding but in mitigation, I wouldn't have done it if I hadn't been going so fast?
I couldn't see that I was driving without lights, because it was so dark...
Perhaps he thought it was too dangerous to drive his car home, and instead remembered that it's far safer to 'take the bus'.
There was a case many years back I recall of a guy who offered the extenuation in court that he had no intention of drink-driving but the landlord of the pub he went to had given him a double whisky on the house, which he had drunk "without thinking" which had the effect of making him reckless and drinking four pints instead of the two he had intended to have. I can't remember which paper it was but there was a headline "I only got drunk because I was drunk, claims driver", which I think summed it up.
"I drink without thinking, please let me keep my licence". Brilliant!
How does the existing suspended sentence work? I assume the 14 months is just for this offence and he will now have to serve the outstanding sentence as well?
I think (though IANAL) the suspended sentence now goes back to the court that originally imposed it and they decide how serious the new offence is, how much it relates to the original offence, how well the defendant has complied with the terms of their suspended sentence and so on. They can then leave the sentence suspended or reimpose part or all of it. They can also decide to reimpose but let it run concurrently with the new sentence or order it to run consecutively.
In theory they should also be under the supervision of a parol officer for the period of suspension but I suspect that doesn't happen in practice due to stuff.
"The friend tried to help but unfortunately he was the worst for drink and put him in the recovery position."
Lucky the cyclist did not have spine or neck injuries then, as this could have paralysed him.
Why no effort to get a suspended sentence on the grounds that e.g. "but it's not fair to his kids - who'll drive them now" or "but how will he repay his employer if he can't work"?
It seems that drunk driving is the one thing that (mostly...) people agree is beyond the pale when operating a vehicle. That's an improvement but it seems to make everything else a minor or non-issue.
So phone use or other distractions are dismissed. Not driving to conditions isn't regarded as particularly dangerous e.g. speeding, driving at the speed limit in low sun, the dark, fog. "I didn't see" AKA didn't bother to look is the go-to defense. All are "nothing like drink driving". Even though their effects have been shown to be equal to heavy intoxication.
This "anchoring effect" (one really bad thing so everything else must be less so) is so common that folks on this very forum have espoused it.
Beyond the pale, yet still only a fourteen month sentence. I can't help always comparing to Charlie Alliston's eighteen month sentence.
"Section 141 of the Licensing Act 2003 makes it an offence to knowingly sell or attempt to sell alcohol to a person who is drunk, or to knowingly allow alcohol to be sold to such a person on licensed premises"
I take it that as this "person" went from pub to pub getting more and more drunk, the pubs which served them when its against the law to do so, will be losing their licences? If not, why not?
Well...I'm totally on board with more rigorous enforcement of the law about serving alcohol to someone who's drunk, but it's a hard one to enforce as there's no legal definition of what constitutes "drunk". Plenty of people who drink regularly can drink four pints without showing much outward sign of intoxication, and as this specimen seems to have gone from pub to pub having a pint in each the publicans wouldn't have been able to monitor how much he'd had. He could also have been bought some or all of the drinks by his friend and so have had no direct contact with bar staff. So while I think you make a valid point I can't see too much blame lying with the pubs in this instance, it's not like some cases one hears of where a local is allowed to drink six pints then go and get in their car with the bar staff knowing full well what they're up to.
Is that so? That just seems really weird, given that the job of a publican is to - er - sell alcohol...
Not to drunk people.
S/he should lose their licence. Sorry, the law is clear.